Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 2 N/A 14.0 (13.7, 14.4) N/A 1,779 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 45,453 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
Brown County 2 Urban 10.8 (6.7, 16.5) 72 (11, 80) 5 falling falling trend -35.2 (-59.2, -3.7)
Muskingum County 2 Rural 12.1 (9.0, 16.0) 62 (13, 79) 11 stable stable trend -27.0 (-50.9, 3.1)
Perry County 2 Urban 7.4 (4.2, 12.4) 80 (34, 80) 3 falling falling trend -22.6 (-55.2, -5.7)
Athens County 2 Rural 12.8 (8.8, 17.9) 52 (6, 79) 7 stable stable trend -21.6 (-43.3, 3.9)
Washington County 2 Rural 11.0 (7.6, 15.4) 71 (14, 80) 8 stable stable trend -15.0 (-42.2, 0.6)
Trumbull County 2 Urban 12.2 (10.1, 14.6) 61 (21, 76) 28 stable stable trend -14.1 (-33.1, 6.1)
Erie County 2 Urban 17.6 (13.6, 22.4) 13 (2, 63) 16 stable stable trend -13.7 (-39.3, 0.7)
Knox County 2 Rural 16.2 (11.9, 21.5) 19 (2, 74) 11 stable stable trend -11.2 (-36.8, 7.2)
Greene County 2 Urban 15.3 (12.8, 18.3) 23 (7, 65) 27 stable stable trend -9.1 (-25.6, 0.3)
Meigs County 2 Rural 12.9 (7.1, 21.6) 49 (2, 80) 3 stable stable trend -8.6 (-29.7, 5.0)
Fairfield County 2 Urban 11.8 (9.6, 14.5) 66 (23, 78) 20 falling falling trend -6.8 (-16.4, -2.2)
Coshocton County 2 Rural 12.5 (7.7, 19.2) 55 (5, 80) 4 falling falling trend -6.5 (-55.4, -0.9)
Ashland County 2 Rural 13.1 (9.1, 18.4) 46 (6, 80) 7 falling falling trend -5.7 (-20.8, -0.8)
Pickaway County 2 Urban 11.6 (8.1, 16.2) 67 (11, 80) 7 falling falling trend -5.3 (-15.6, -0.7)
Portage County 2 Urban 12.2 (9.9, 14.9) 60 (20, 78) 21 stable stable trend -5.3 (-26.3, 3.8)
Geauga County 2 Urban 17.1 (13.5, 21.4) 14 (3, 64) 18 stable stable trend -5.0 (-24.1, 3.0)
Scioto County 2 Rural 14.3 (10.8, 18.6) 34 (5, 75) 12 stable stable trend -4.9 (-20.5, 0.5)
Ashtabula County 2 Urban 14.2 (11.0, 17.9) 36 (7, 75) 15 stable stable trend -4.6 (-17.7, 1.2)
Miami County 2 Urban 13.5 (10.7, 17.0) 43 (11, 76) 17 stable stable trend -4.5 (-25.6, 6.3)
Franklin County 2 Urban 12.0 (11.2, 12.9) 64 (42, 70) 160 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.1, -2.3)
Lake County 2 Urban 16.3 (14.0, 18.7) 18 (7, 53) 43 stable stable trend -3.7 (-25.5, 5.8)
Cuyahoga County 2 Urban 15.4 (14.4, 16.4) 22 (15, 44) 214 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.2, -1.1)
Union County 2 Urban 15.9 (11.9, 20.9) 20 (3, 74) 11 stable stable trend -3.1 (-15.6, 1.3)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 19.4 (14.5, 25.3) 7 (1, 62) 11 stable stable trend -2.6 (-16.3, 1.5)
Allen County 2 Urban 15.2 (12.1, 19.0) 24 (5, 71) 17 stable stable trend -2.5 (-14.6, 2.1)
Clinton County 2 Rural 12.6 (8.1, 18.7) 53 (6, 80) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-17.8, 0.9)
Delaware County 2 Urban 14.5 (12.3, 17.0) 32 (11, 66) 33 stable stable trend -2.5 (-15.3, 1.3)
Hancock County 2 Rural 18.9 (14.8, 23.9) 9 (1, 56) 15 stable stable trend -2.5 (-19.7, 4.8)
Putnam County 2 Rural 18.0 (12.0, 26.0) 11 (1, 76) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-18.4, 3.7)
Butler County 2 Urban 11.0 (9.6, 12.6) 70 (42, 77) 44 stable stable trend -2.3 (-15.1, 1.7)
Wayne County 2 Rural 14.6 (11.5, 18.2) 31 (7, 74) 17 stable stable trend -2.0 (-18.7, 1.2)
Lucas County 2 Urban 11.5 (10.1, 13.1) 69 (36, 76) 51 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.7, 0.5)
Madison County 2 Urban 9.6 (6.1, 14.5) 75 (18, 80) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.6, 2.0)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 9.9 (8.9, 10.9) 74 (59, 79) 85 stable stable trend -0.9 (-8.3, 1.0)
Fayette County 2 Rural 12.4 (7.2, 19.7) 57 (4, 80) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-14.3, 4.5)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 14.1 (12.6, 15.6) 38 (18, 60) 77 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.0, 2.3)
Warren County 2 Urban 13.5 (11.5, 15.7) 45 (17, 71) 34 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 3.0)
Clermont County 2 Urban 11.6 (9.6, 13.8) 68 (29, 78) 26 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.2)
Darke County 2 Rural 9.0 (5.9, 13.3) 77 (31, 80) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-14.8, 5.5)
Highland County 2 Rural 9.0 (5.5, 13.9) 78 (23, 80) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.4, 7.3)
Defiance County 2 Rural 8.4 (4.7, 13.7) 79 (24, 80) 3 stable stable trend 1.9 (-4.2, 8.8)
Wood County 2 Urban 13.8 (11.0, 17.1) 42 (10, 74) 18 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.1, 4.4)
Clark County 2 Urban 14.7 (11.8, 17.9) 30 (7, 71) 21 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.5, 4.1)
Columbiana County 2 Rural 13.1 (10.1, 16.7) 47 (11, 78) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 5.3)
Medina County 2 Urban 19.5 (16.7, 22.6) 6 (2, 30) 39 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 4.8)
Stark County 2 Urban 15.2 (13.4, 17.1) 25 (12, 53) 61 stable stable trend 2.3 (-6.8, 4.9)
Huron County 2 Rural 14.1 (10.1, 19.0) 37 (5, 78) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.1, 7.8)
Gallia County 2 Rural 13.9 (8.6, 21.3) 40 (2, 80) 5 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.4, 8.6)
Van Wert County 2 Rural 13.1 (7.8, 20.4) 48 (3, 80) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.1, 11.1)
Seneca County 2 Rural 15.0 (10.8, 20.4) 28 (4, 77) 9 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.4, 7.9)
Richland County 2 Urban 11.9 (9.4, 14.9) 65 (21, 78) 17 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.4, 6.2)
Tuscarawas County 2 Rural 14.0 (10.8, 17.9) 39 (7, 76) 14 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.7, 6.3)
Sandusky County 2 Rural 15.8 (11.5, 21.1) 21 (2, 74) 10 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.4, 6.6)
Licking County 2 Urban 17.9 (15.2, 20.9) 12 (4, 43) 35 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.8, 6.7)
Belmont County 2 Urban 19.0 (14.5, 24.5) 8 (1, 61) 14 stable stable trend 3.5 (-5.0, 21.0)
Crawford County 2 Rural 12.8 (8.3, 18.9) 50 (4, 80) 6 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.6, 7.7)
Ross County 2 Rural 13.8 (10.4, 18.1) 41 (7, 77) 12 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.4, 8.1)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 24.0 (18.7, 30.4) 2 (1, 26) 16 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.7, 7.9)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 21.6 (15.3, 29.5) 5 (1, 55) 10 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.6, 10.3)
Hocking County 2 Urban 12.0 (6.8, 19.5) 63 (4, 80) 4 stable stable trend 4.7 (-0.6, 11.6)
Preble County 2 Rural 16.5 (11.2, 23.4) 16 (1, 78) 7 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.6, 8.6)
Lorain County 2 Urban 23.9 (21.5, 26.4) 4 (1, 9) 83 stable stable trend 4.9 (-4.6, 8.8)
Mahoning County 2 Urban 13.5 (11.4, 15.8) 44 (16, 71) 35 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.4, 7.9)
Fulton County 2 Urban 15.1 (10.3, 21.4) 27 (2, 78) 7 rising rising trend 5.3 (0.7, 11.7)
Summit County 2 Urban 18.8 (17.2, 20.5) 10 (4, 24) 112 rising rising trend 6.2 (4.6, 8.3)
Auglaize County 2 Rural 16.3 (11.3, 22.6) 17 (2, 77) 8
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban 14.3 (8.6, 22.5) 33 (1, 80) 5
*
*
Champaign County 2 Rural 14.2 (9.5, 20.6) 35 (3, 80) 6
*
*
Guernsey County 2 Rural 9.4 (5.4, 15.2) 76 (15, 80) 4
*
*
Hardin County 2 Rural 15.0 (9.4, 22.7) 29 (1, 80) 5
*
*
Harrison County 2 Rural 24.1 (14.0, 38.7) 1 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Holmes County 2 Rural 9.9 (6.0, 15.3) 73 (15, 80) 4
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 12.5 (7.6, 19.3) 56 (5, 80) 4
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural 12.6 (8.4, 18.2) 54 (5, 80) 6
*
*
Marion County 2 Rural 12.8 (9.2, 17.3) 51 (8, 79) 9
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural 16.7 (11.5, 23.2) 15 (1, 77) 8
*
*
Morrow County 2 Urban 12.3 (7.8, 18.5) 59 (5, 80) 5
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural 15.1 (9.1, 23.6) 26 (1, 80) 4
*
*
Shelby County 2 Rural 23.9 (18.0, 31.1) 3 (1, 34) 12
*
*
Williams County 2 Rural 12.4 (7.8, 18.7) 58 (4, 80) 5
*
*
Adams County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 2:12 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top