Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 18.0 (17.7, 18.4) N/A 2,265 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 73,915 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Washington County 2 Rural 19.3 (10.4, 33.6) 21 (1, 92) 3
*
*
Warren County 2 Rural 11.8 (6.5, 20.3) 91 (7, 92) 4
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural 13.6 (8.1, 21.9) 87 (4, 92) 4
*
*
Perquimans County 2 Rural 14.8 (9.0, 24.8) 82 (3, 92) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.5, -0.8)
Anson County 2 Urban 14.9 (8.9, 23.6) 80 (1, 92) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.4)
Chowan County 2 Rural 17.8 (10.8, 28.6) 41 (1, 92) 4 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.5, 8.5)
Bertie County 2 Rural 14.9 (9.1, 23.7) 81 (2, 92) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.2)
Hertford County 2 Rural 15.1 (9.2, 23.7) 79 (2, 92) 4
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural 24.4 (15.4, 37.4) 1 (1, 91) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-7.0, 3.9)
Clay County 2 Rural 18.4 (11.7, 30.3) 33 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.6, 5.7)
Pamlico County 2 Rural 20.8 (13.2, 33.1) 15 (1, 92) 5
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural 12.5 (7.8, 20.1) 89 (13, 92) 5 falling falling trend -11.6 (-36.7, -0.6)
Martin County 2 Rural 17.4 (11.0, 26.4) 52 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 3.8)
Avery County 2 Rural 21.8 (14.3, 32.4) 12 (1, 91) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-26.2, 31.3)
Mitchell County 2 Rural 23.5 (15.0, 35.7) 5 (1, 91) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.4, 7.7)
Northampton County 2 Rural 17.3 (11.2, 26.5) 55 (1, 92) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.1, 1.8)
Caswell County 2 Rural 17.5 (11.4, 26.0) 48 (1, 92) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.9, 4.1)
Madison County 2 Urban 19.7 (12.9, 29.1) 20 (1, 92) 6
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural 15.8 (10.4, 23.3) 72 (1, 92) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 2.1)
Dare County 2 Rural 11.1 (7.5, 16.2) 92 (36, 92) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.6)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 12.8 (8.7, 18.2) 88 (17, 92) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.0, 3.8)
Yancey County 2 Rural 22.1 (15.1, 31.9) 10 (1, 90) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.4)
Bladen County 2 Rural 18.5 (12.8, 25.9) 32 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend -28.8 (-52.1, 1.8)
Hoke County 2 Urban 15.7 (10.9, 21.7) 75 (4, 92) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 3.2)
Ashe County 2 Rural 17.6 (12.3, 24.8) 45 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.8, 2.8)
Scotland County 2 Rural 18.0 (12.8, 24.6) 39 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.6)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 16.1 (11.1, 23.1) 69 (3, 92) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.4)
Yadkin County 2 Urban 16.6 (12.1, 22.5) 62 (3, 92) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.1)
Alexander County 2 Urban 18.0 (13.2, 24.2) 38 (2, 91) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.2, 4.7)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 14.5 (10.5, 19.7) 85 (11, 92) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.4)
Vance County 2 Rural 18.1 (13.2, 24.3) 36 (1, 91) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.7, 2.4)
Watauga County 2 Rural 15.5 (11.3, 20.9) 76 (6, 92) 10 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.9, -0.2)
Halifax County 2 Rural 14.8 (10.8, 20.0) 83 (9, 92) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.6)
Richmond County 2 Rural 18.5 (13.5, 24.7) 31 (1, 90) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 1.8)
Davie County 2 Urban 17.4 (12.7, 23.4) 51 (2, 91) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.6, 3.4)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 15.8 (11.5, 21.7) 71 (7, 92) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.6)
Jackson County 2 Rural 20.3 (14.9, 27.0) 16 (1, 89) 11 rising rising trend 25.5 (2.2, 45.2)
Person County 2 Urban 19.2 (14.3, 25.5) 24 (1, 89) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.1)
Duplin County 2 Rural 17.4 (13.1, 22.9) 49 (3, 91) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.3)
Columbus County 2 Rural 16.6 (12.6, 21.6) 61 (5, 91) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.1)
Lee County 2 Rural 16.3 (12.4, 21.1) 68 (7, 91) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.9)
Sampson County 2 Rural 17.6 (13.4, 22.7) 44 (4, 90) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 3.9)
McDowell County 2 Rural 21.1 (16.2, 27.2) 13 (1, 85) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.6)
Stokes County 2 Urban 19.2 (14.7, 24.9) 22 (1, 88) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 3.9)
Macon County 2 Rural 19.1 (14.6, 25.1) 26 (1, 89) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.6)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 19.1 (14.8, 24.4) 28 (1, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.1)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 22.7 (17.4, 29.2) 7 (1, 78) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.3)
Franklin County 2 Urban 17.3 (13.5, 21.9) 54 (6, 90) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Robeson County 2 Rural 11.9 (9.3, 14.9) 90 (59, 92) 16 falling falling trend -21.3 (-31.6, -16.2)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 16.6 (13.0, 21.1) 60 (8, 90) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.5)
Wilkes County 2 Rural 17.3 (13.5, 21.9) 56 (5, 89) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.6)
Wilson County 2 Rural 16.3 (12.8, 20.5) 67 (9, 91) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.4)
Stanly County 2 Rural 19.8 (15.6, 24.8) 19 (1, 85) 17 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.0, 12.0)
Granville County 2 Rural 23.6 (18.8, 29.3) 4 (1, 68) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 3.0)
Pender County 2 Urban 22.0 (17.5, 27.4) 11 (1, 76) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.4)
Surry County 2 Rural 16.5 (13.2, 20.5) 64 (10, 90) 18 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.5)
Carteret County 2 Rural 15.7 (12.4, 19.7) 74 (13, 91) 19 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.6, 1.4)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 14.6 (11.7, 18.1) 84 (25, 92) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Burke County 2 Urban 15.4 (12.5, 19.0) 77 (19, 91) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 17.6 (14.2, 21.5) 46 (7, 88) 21 falling falling trend -15.2 (-25.0, -1.9)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 15.9 (12.9, 19.4) 70 (14, 91) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Nash County 2 Urban 16.5 (13.4, 20.3) 63 (10, 90) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.5)
Wayne County 2 Urban 15.3 (12.4, 18.6) 78 (20, 91) 21 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 3.0)
Harnett County 2 Rural 15.7 (12.8, 19.0) 73 (19, 90) 21 falling falling trend -6.7 (-16.1, -1.2)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 21.0 (17.2, 25.5) 14 (1, 78) 23 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.4)
Haywood County 2 Rural 23.2 (19.0, 28.2) 6 (1, 60) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Craven County 2 Rural 18.6 (15.3, 22.4) 30 (5, 83) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Chatham County 2 Urban 22.5 (18.5, 27.2) 9 (1, 65) 26 stable stable trend -8.5 (-18.7, 2.4)
Moore County 2 Urban 19.1 (15.9, 22.8) 27 (4, 80) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Catawba County 2 Urban 14.5 (12.2, 17.1) 86 (33, 91) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Randolph County 2 Urban 16.4 (13.8, 19.3) 66 (17, 88) 30 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Rowan County 2 Urban 16.4 (13.8, 19.3) 65 (16, 88) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Onslow County 2 Urban 20.0 (16.9, 23.4) 18 (3, 72) 32 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 4.0)
Pitt County 2 Urban 19.2 (16.3, 22.5) 23 (5, 76) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.2)
Orange County 2 Urban 23.9 (20.6, 27.7) 2 (1, 35) 38 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.9)
Johnston County 2 Urban 17.2 (14.8, 19.9) 57 (13, 84) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.5)
Davidson County 2 Urban 17.9 (15.5, 20.7) 40 (9, 81) 40 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Iredell County 2 Urban 18.1 (15.6, 20.8) 35 (10, 81) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 17.3 (15.0, 19.9) 53 (14, 83) 41 falling falling trend -2.7 (-7.8, -1.0)
Henderson County 2 Urban 23.6 (20.4, 27.3) 3 (1, 39) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Union County 2 Urban 17.8 (15.5, 20.3) 42 (13, 81) 46 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.8)
Gaston County 2 Urban 17.5 (15.3, 20.0) 47 (14, 82) 48 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Alamance County 2 Urban 22.7 (19.8, 25.8) 8 (1, 43) 48 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.9)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 18.0 (15.6, 20.8) 37 (10, 79) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.3)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 17.1 (15.1, 19.3) 58 (18, 81) 56 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Durham County 2 Urban 16.7 (14.7, 18.8) 59 (20, 83) 56 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.7)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 20.0 (17.7, 22.6) 17 (5, 64) 57 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.5)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 18.2 (16.3, 20.3) 34 (13, 74) 68 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 17.7 (16.0, 19.6) 43 (17, 75) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Guilford County 2 Urban 18.6 (17.1, 20.2) 29 (14, 65) 114 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 17.4 (16.3, 18.6) 50 (26, 71) 184 falling falling trend -1.1 (-4.3, -0.2)
Wake County 2 Urban 19.2 (18.0, 20.4) 25 (13, 53) 214 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.3, -0.7)
Alleghany County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 4:41 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top