Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 2 N/A 18.6 (18.2, 18.9) N/A 2,373 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.3, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 73,915 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Alcona County 2 Rural 18.2 (11.0, 31.9) 42 (1, 73) 5
*
*
Allegan County 2 Rural 15.8 (13.0, 19.0) 63 (20, 72) 25 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.0)
Alpena County 2 Rural 20.2 (14.3, 27.9) 20 (1, 72) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.4, 4.7)
Antrim County 2 Rural 16.5 (10.7, 24.8) 59 (3, 73) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.1)
Arenac County 2 Rural 23.2 (14.7, 35.6) 5 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-8.0, 2.2)
Barry County 2 Urban 15.5 (11.9, 20.0) 65 (12, 73) 13 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.5, 0.2)
Bay County 2 Urban 17.2 (14.3, 20.6) 51 (11, 70) 27 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Benzie County 2 Urban 20.5 (12.6, 31.9) 17 (1, 73) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 4.1)
Berrien County 2 Urban 18.0 (15.4, 20.9) 46 (10, 67) 39 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.2)
Branch County 2 Rural 17.8 (13.3, 23.6) 47 (4, 72) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.6)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 16.2 (13.6, 19.2) 61 (20, 71) 29 falling falling trend -17.1 (-26.1, -7.2)
Cass County 2 Urban 20.6 (15.9, 26.3) 14 (2, 69) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.1)
Charlevoix County 2 Rural 28.7 (21.3, 38.3) 2 (1, 45) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.0, 4.7)
Cheboygan County 2 Rural 20.1 (14.1, 28.3) 22 (2, 72) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.2)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 17.1 (12.2, 23.5) 53 (5, 73) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 3.4)
Clare County 2 Rural 17.4 (11.8, 24.9) 49 (3, 73) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 3.3)
Clinton County 2 Urban 19.9 (16.2, 24.3) 23 (3, 66) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.3)
Crawford County 2 Rural 15.3 (8.8, 26.2) 67 (3, 73) 4 falling falling trend -4.7 (-8.9, -0.9)
Delta County 2 Rural 17.2 (12.2, 23.8) 50 (3, 73) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 3.3)
Eaton County 2 Urban 18.2 (15.1, 21.7) 43 (8, 68) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.8)
Emmet County 2 Rural 22.3 (16.7, 29.5) 7 (1, 67) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 5.1)
Genesee County 2 Urban 16.4 (14.8, 18.1) 60 (30, 68) 85 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Gladwin County 2 Rural 20.1 (13.5, 29.1) 21 (1, 73) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.0, 5.2)
Gogebic County 2 Rural 12.5 (6.8, 22.3) 72 (5, 73) 3 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.7, -0.4)
Grand Traverse County 2 Urban 21.8 (18.3, 25.9) 9 (2, 55) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Gratiot County 2 Rural 19.8 (14.6, 26.4) 24 (2, 72) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.3)
Hillsdale County 2 Rural 24.3 (19.2, 30.6) 4 (1, 58) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.4, 4.1)
Houghton County 2 Rural 12.4 (7.8, 18.8) 73 (14, 73) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.8, 2.3)
Huron County 2 Rural 20.6 (15.0, 27.9) 15 (2, 71) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.1)
Ingham County 2 Urban 18.4 (16.2, 20.8) 38 (12, 63) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Ionia County 2 Urban 18.6 (14.4, 23.6) 37 (4, 70) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.4)
Iosco County 2 Rural 17.6 (12.3, 25.1) 48 (3, 73) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.6)
Iron County 2 Rural 19.8 (10.9, 34.3) 26 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Isabella County 2 Rural 19.5 (14.9, 25.2) 28 (3, 70) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 1.9)
Jackson County 2 Urban 19.4 (16.8, 22.3) 30 (7, 62) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Kalamazoo County 2 Urban 18.7 (16.5, 21.1) 36 (10, 61) 55 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.0)
Kalkaska County 2 Urban 26.6 (17.7, 38.8) 3 (1, 68) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.9, 5.5)
Kent County 2 Urban 17.1 (15.7, 18.6) 54 (27, 64) 121 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Lapeer County 2 Urban 18.9 (15.5, 22.8) 35 (6, 67) 24 stable stable trend -1.9 (-13.5, 2.7)
Leelanau County 2 Urban 18.3 (12.5, 26.7) 40 (2, 73) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.5, 6.0)
Lenawee County 2 Rural 16.2 (13.3, 19.6) 62 (17, 72) 23 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.5)
Livingston County 2 Urban 19.5 (17.1, 22.3) 27 (7, 58) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.2)
Macomb County 2 Urban 20.5 (19.3, 21.8) 16 (8, 38) 230 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Manistee County 2 Rural 19.0 (12.9, 27.5) 34 (2, 73) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.6, 2.9)
Marquette County 2 Rural 12.9 (9.7, 17.0) 70 (37, 73) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.7)
Mason County 2 Rural 17.1 (12.0, 24.1) 52 (4, 73) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.5)
Mecosta County 2 Rural 21.3 (15.7, 28.3) 11 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.1)
Menominee County 2 Rural 19.2 (12.4, 28.8) 31 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-4.2, 9.2)
Midland County 2 Urban 22.1 (18.3, 26.6) 8 (2, 54) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.3)
Missaukee County 2 Rural 19.2 (11.7, 30.3) 32 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-6.8, 7.0)
Monroe County 2 Urban 16.9 (14.4, 19.8) 56 (16, 70) 34 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.8)
Montcalm County 2 Urban 19.1 (15.2, 23.9) 33 (4, 70) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.9)
Montmorency County 2 Rural 22.4 (11.2, 41.4) 6 (1, 73) 3 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.6, 6.3)
Muskegon County 2 Urban 12.7 (10.6, 15.1) 71 (52, 73) 27 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.2)
Newaygo County 2 Rural 16.7 (12.3, 22.1) 58 (6, 73) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.0)
Oakland County 2 Urban 20.6 (19.6, 21.6) 13 (9, 35) 336 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Oceana County 2 Rural 15.7 (10.2, 23.3) 64 (4, 73) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 4.8)
Ogemaw County 2 Rural 13.3 (8.2, 21.1) 68 (8, 73) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.6, 2.3)
Osceola County 2 Rural 21.4 (14.9, 30.2) 10 (1, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.8, 7.3)
Otsego County 2 Rural 17.1 (11.2, 25.2) 55 (3, 73) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.1, 1.6)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 16.9 (14.9, 19.0) 57 (23, 67) 57 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Presque Isle County 2 Rural 35.9 (23.6, 53.2) 1 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.1, 7.0)
Roscommon County 2 Rural 18.0 (12.9, 25.6) 45 (3, 73) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.8)
Saginaw County 2 Urban 20.3 (17.9, 23.1) 19 (5, 55) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Sanilac County 2 Rural 19.4 (14.3, 25.9) 29 (2, 71) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 4.8)
Shiawassee County 2 Rural 19.8 (15.7, 24.8) 25 (3, 69) 17 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 3.8)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 18.4 (15.8, 21.2) 39 (9, 65) 40 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
St. Joseph County 2 Rural 15.3 (11.5, 20.0) 66 (12, 73) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.2, 1.7)
Tuscola County 2 Rural 18.3 (14.3, 23.1) 41 (4, 71) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.8)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 13.1 (10.0, 17.0) 69 (33, 73) 13 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.0)
Washtenaw County 2 Urban 21.0 (19.0, 23.2) 12 (5, 45) 82 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Wayne County 2 Urban 18.2 (17.3, 19.0) 44 (25, 53) 376 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Wexford County 2 Rural 20.5 (14.8, 27.8) 18 (2, 71) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.4, 6.6)
Alger County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 9:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top