Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 16.0 (15.4, 16.7) N/A 567 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.4, -1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 73,915 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Marshall County 2 Urban 10.0 (6.3, 15.2) 59 (26, 59) 5 falling falling trend -13.0 (-35.0, -2.1)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 11.2 (6.6, 17.7) 58 (13, 59) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-5.4, 9.2)
Scott County 2 Urban 11.9 (7.1, 18.8) 57 (9, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.9, 3.2)
DeSoto County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.3, 15.0) 56 (30, 59) 24 falling falling trend -6.6 (-16.6, -2.2)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 12.6 (9.4, 16.5) 55 (19, 59) 12 stable stable trend -3.5 (-22.6, 1.2)
Copiah County 2 Urban 13.0 (8.1, 20.1) 54 (7, 59) 5 stable stable trend -7.7 (-35.1, 0.0)
Panola County 2 Rural 13.3 (8.6, 19.6) 53 (8, 59) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.5, 0.6)
Jasper County 2 Rural 13.5 (7.4, 23.1) 52 (3, 59) 3 stable stable trend -18.3 (-38.1, 2.3)
Warren County 2 Rural 13.6 (9.3, 19.2) 51 (9, 59) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.0)
Grenada County 2 Rural 13.7 (7.9, 22.4) 50 (4, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-7.3, 5.3)
Winston County 2 Rural 13.9 (7.9, 23.0) 49 (3, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.6, 2.2)
Leflore County 2 Rural 13.9 (8.4, 21.7) 48 (4, 59) 4 stable stable trend -6.3 (-31.9, 1.2)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 14.2 (9.2, 21.1) 47 (5, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.3, 3.4)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 14.3 (9.4, 21.1) 46 (6, 59) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.6)
George County 2 Rural 14.4 (8.7, 22.6) 45 (3, 59) 4
*
*
Sunflower County 2 Rural 14.4 (8.8, 22.4) 44 (3, 59) 4 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 7.0)
Newton County 2 Rural 14.6 (8.5, 23.4) 43 (3, 59) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.6, 4.2)
Yazoo County 2 Urban 14.7 (9.0, 22.6) 42 (3, 59) 4
*
*
Leake County 2 Rural 14.9 (8.8, 23.7) 41 (2, 59) 4
*
*
Hinds County 2 Urban 14.9 (12.8, 17.3) 40 (18, 54) 38 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 15.0 (10.4, 21.2) 39 (6, 59) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-15.7, 2.8)
Clarke County 2 Rural 15.1 (8.7, 25.0) 38 (2, 59) 4
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural 15.2 (10.8, 20.9) 37 (6, 59) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.4)
Wayne County 2 Rural 15.4 (8.9, 24.8) 36 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural 15.5 (9.0, 25.2) 35 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Hancock County 2 Urban 15.6 (11.4, 21.1) 34 (5, 58) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.1)
Stone County 2 Urban 15.8 (8.9, 26.1) 33 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Jackson County 2 Urban 15.9 (13.3, 18.9) 32 (11, 53) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 16.1 (12.2, 21.0) 31 (6, 58) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.6)
Forrest County 2 Urban 16.3 (12.5, 20.9) 30 (6, 56) 13 falling falling trend -5.8 (-15.7, -3.3)
Lamar County 2 Urban 16.3 (12.3, 21.2) 29 (6, 57) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.8)
Monroe County 2 Rural 16.4 (11.5, 22.8) 28 (3, 58) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.7)
Jones County 2 Rural 16.6 (12.7, 21.3) 27 (6, 56) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 0.9)
Covington County 2 Rural 16.6 (9.8, 26.4) 26 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural 16.6 (11.8, 22.7) 25 (3, 58) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.8, 8.8)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 16.8 (10.3, 26.2) 24 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.1, 3.1)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 16.9 (11.6, 23.6) 23 (2, 59) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.7, 3.9)
Rankin County 2 Urban 17.3 (14.7, 20.2) 22 (7, 47) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.2)
Marion County 2 Rural 17.6 (11.2, 26.4) 21 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.7, 3.0)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 17.6 (10.6, 27.8) 20 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.2, 6.5)
Madison County 2 Urban 17.8 (14.5, 21.6) 19 (5, 49) 22 falling falling trend -4.2 (-12.1, -0.7)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 18.2 (13.8, 23.6) 18 (3, 54) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.7, 2.3)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 18.6 (13.1, 25.8) 17 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.9, 3.4)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 19.1 (12.8, 27.5) 16 (1, 57) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.2, 3.8)
Walthall County 2 Rural 19.3 (10.9, 31.9) 15 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.7, 5.1)
Greene County 2 Rural 19.4 (11.0, 32.1) 14 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Harrison County 2 Urban 19.4 (16.9, 22.1) 13 (4, 36) 47 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.8)
Pike County 2 Rural 19.4 (14.1, 26.2) 12 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.0, 4.0)
Adams County 2 Rural 19.5 (13.2, 27.8) 11 (1, 57) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 3.7)
Smith County 2 Rural 20.4 (11.8, 33.1) 10 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Coahoma County 2 Rural 21.7 (13.8, 32.5) 9 (1, 57) 5
*
*
Union County 2 Rural 21.9 (15.1, 30.7) 8 (1, 53) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.5, 4.5)
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 22.1 (12.4, 36.6) 7 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Simpson County 2 Urban 22.7 (15.5, 32.2) 6 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.9, 8.4)
Perry County 2 Urban 23.1 (13.5, 37.6) 5 (1, 58) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.0, 6.9)
Tippah County 2 Rural 23.2 (15.4, 33.8) 4 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 3.0)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 23.6 (13.9, 38.8) 3 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Lee County 2 Rural 23.7 (19.5, 28.6) 2 (1, 25) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.2)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 24.5 (17.1, 34.2) 1 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.2, 5.2)
Amite County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Attala County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tate County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 3:15 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top