Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Colorado 2 N/A 16.3 (15.8, 16.8) N/A 1,041 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 73,915 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Pueblo County 2 Urban 14.8 (12.6, 17.4) 23 (7, 30) 33 falling falling trend -16.5 (-22.1, -12.1)
Larimer County 2 Urban 18.0 (16.2, 19.9) 9 (2, 21) 77 falling falling trend -10.6 (-18.6, -1.6)
Teller County 2 Urban 15.2 (9.6, 23.3) 21 (1, 32) 6 stable stable trend -3.7 (-13.5, 0.4)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 16.4 (15.1, 17.8) 13 (6, 25) 119 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.9, -1.5)
Montezuma County 2 Rural 11.7 (7.3, 18.3) 31 (6, 32) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.7, 2.7)
Fremont County 2 Rural 14.1 (10.4, 18.8) 27 (4, 32) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.1)
Mesa County 2 Urban 15.6 (13.2, 18.3) 20 (4, 30) 33 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.0)
Montrose County 2 Rural 14.0 (10.2, 19.0) 28 (3, 32) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.6, 1.7)
Arapahoe County 2 Urban 16.2 (14.8, 17.6) 15 (6, 26) 112 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
El Paso County 2 Urban 15.6 (14.3, 16.9) 19 (8, 27) 118 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.1)
Pitkin County 2 Rural 13.7 (7.8, 23.2) 29 (1, 32) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.9, 3.4)
Boulder County 2 Urban 16.1 (14.2, 18.1) 17 (5, 27) 58 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.2)
Logan County 2 Rural 11.6 (6.6, 19.3) 32 (3, 32) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.4, 2.8)
Denver County 2 Urban 17.3 (15.9, 18.9) 10 (3, 22) 115 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Adams County 2 Urban 16.1 (14.4, 17.9) 16 (6, 27) 75 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Douglas County 2 Urban 16.7 (14.9, 18.7) 12 (4, 26) 63 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 1.3)
Elbert County 2 Urban 15.7 (9.7, 24.1) 18 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.4, 4.8)
La Plata County 2 Rural 14.8 (10.8, 19.8) 24 (2, 32) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.5)
Delta County 2 Rural 14.9 (10.5, 21.0) 22 (2, 32) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.4, 4.0)
Eagle County 2 Rural 13.4 (9.1, 19.0) 30 (3, 32) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.0, 5.1)
Garfield County 2 Rural 18.3 (13.6, 24.0) 6 (1, 30) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 3.4)
Morgan County 2 Rural 14.4 (9.2, 21.7) 25 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.1, 4.8)
Weld County 2 Urban 20.0 (17.8, 22.4) 1 (1, 13) 64 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.3)
Chaffee County 2 Rural 18.1 (11.1, 28.3) 7 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.9, 5.6)
Otero County 2 Rural 19.0 (11.5, 29.7) 5 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.9, 5.4)
Broomfield County 2 Urban 19.1 (15.1, 23.9) 4 (1, 27) 16 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.8, 18.7)
Park County 2 Urban 19.9 (11.5, 32.5) 2 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend 3.9 (-3.5, 14.9)
Alamosa County 2 Rural 17.3 (9.7, 28.6) 11 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Gunnison County 2 Rural 18.0 (10.1, 29.9) 8 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Las Animas County 2 Rural 16.2 (9.2, 27.3) 14 (1, 32) 4
*
*
Routt County 2 Rural 19.4 (12.6, 28.7) 3 (1, 32) 6
*
*
Summit County 2 Rural 14.3 (8.4, 22.6) 26 (1, 32) 4
*
*
Archuleta County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baca County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huerfano County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moffat County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prowers County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Grande County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 8:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top