Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 16.0 (15.4, 16.7) N/A 567 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.4, -1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 73,915 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Jasper County 2 Rural 13.5 (7.4, 23.1) 52 (3, 59) 3 stable stable trend -18.3 (-38.1, 2.3)
Marshall County 2 Urban 10.0 (6.3, 15.2) 59 (26, 59) 5 falling falling trend -13.0 (-35.0, -2.1)
Copiah County 2 Urban 13.0 (8.1, 20.1) 54 (7, 59) 5 stable stable trend -7.7 (-35.1, 0.0)
DeSoto County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.3, 15.0) 56 (30, 59) 24 falling falling trend -6.6 (-16.6, -2.2)
Leflore County 2 Rural 13.9 (8.4, 21.7) 48 (4, 59) 4 stable stable trend -6.3 (-31.9, 1.2)
Forrest County 2 Urban 16.3 (12.5, 20.9) 30 (6, 56) 13 falling falling trend -5.8 (-15.7, -3.3)
Madison County 2 Urban 17.8 (14.5, 21.6) 19 (5, 49) 22 falling falling trend -4.2 (-12.1, -0.7)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 12.6 (9.4, 16.5) 55 (19, 59) 12 stable stable trend -3.5 (-22.6, 1.2)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 14.3 (9.4, 21.1) 46 (6, 59) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.6)
Panola County 2 Rural 13.3 (8.6, 19.6) 53 (8, 59) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.5, 0.6)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 16.1 (12.2, 21.0) 31 (6, 58) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.6)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 15.0 (10.4, 21.2) 39 (6, 59) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-15.7, 2.8)
Hinds County 2 Urban 14.9 (12.8, 17.3) 40 (18, 54) 38 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Scott County 2 Urban 11.9 (7.1, 18.8) 57 (9, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.9, 3.2)
Jones County 2 Rural 16.6 (12.7, 21.3) 27 (6, 56) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 0.9)
Warren County 2 Rural 13.6 (9.3, 19.2) 51 (9, 59) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.0)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 15.2 (10.8, 20.9) 37 (6, 59) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.4)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 16.9 (11.6, 23.6) 23 (2, 59) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.7, 3.9)
Winston County 2 Rural 13.9 (7.9, 23.0) 49 (3, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.6, 2.2)
Marion County 2 Rural 17.6 (11.2, 26.4) 21 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.7, 3.0)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 14.2 (9.2, 21.1) 47 (5, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.3, 3.4)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 18.2 (13.8, 23.6) 18 (3, 54) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.7, 2.3)
Walthall County 2 Rural 19.3 (10.9, 31.9) 15 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.7, 5.1)
Grenada County 2 Rural 13.7 (7.9, 22.4) 50 (4, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-7.3, 5.3)
Jackson County 2 Urban 15.9 (13.3, 18.9) 32 (11, 53) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 16.8 (10.3, 26.2) 24 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.1, 3.1)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 19.1 (12.8, 27.5) 16 (1, 57) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.2, 3.8)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 18.6 (13.1, 25.8) 17 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.9, 3.4)
Newton County 2 Rural 14.6 (8.5, 23.4) 43 (3, 59) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.6, 4.2)
Lamar County 2 Urban 16.3 (12.3, 21.2) 29 (6, 57) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.8)
Rankin County 2 Urban 17.3 (14.7, 20.2) 22 (7, 47) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.2)
Adams County 2 Rural 19.5 (13.2, 27.8) 11 (1, 57) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 3.7)
Tippah County 2 Rural 23.2 (15.4, 33.8) 4 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 3.0)
Pike County 2 Rural 19.4 (14.1, 26.2) 12 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.0, 4.0)
Perry County 2 Urban 23.1 (13.5, 37.6) 5 (1, 58) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.0, 6.9)
Hancock County 2 Urban 15.6 (11.4, 21.1) 34 (5, 58) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.1)
Harrison County 2 Urban 19.4 (16.9, 22.1) 13 (4, 36) 47 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.8)
Union County 2 Rural 21.9 (15.1, 30.7) 8 (1, 53) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.5, 4.5)
Lee County 2 Rural 23.7 (19.5, 28.6) 2 (1, 25) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.2)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 24.5 (17.1, 34.2) 1 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.2, 5.2)
Monroe County 2 Rural 16.4 (11.5, 22.8) 28 (3, 58) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.7)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 11.2 (6.6, 17.7) 58 (13, 59) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-5.4, 9.2)
Simpson County 2 Urban 22.7 (15.5, 32.2) 6 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.9, 8.4)
Washington County 2 Rural 16.6 (11.8, 22.7) 25 (3, 58) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.8, 8.8)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 17.6 (10.6, 27.8) 20 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.2, 6.5)
Sunflower County 2 Rural 14.4 (8.8, 22.4) 44 (3, 59) 4 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 7.0)
Clarke County 2 Rural 15.1 (8.7, 25.0) 38 (2, 59) 4
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural 15.5 (9.0, 25.2) 35 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Coahoma County 2 Rural 21.7 (13.8, 32.5) 9 (1, 57) 5
*
*
Covington County 2 Rural 16.6 (9.8, 26.4) 26 (1, 59) 4
*
*
George County 2 Rural 14.4 (8.7, 22.6) 45 (3, 59) 4
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural 19.4 (11.0, 32.1) 14 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Leake County 2 Rural 14.9 (8.8, 23.7) 41 (2, 59) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural 23.6 (13.9, 38.8) 3 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Smith County 2 Rural 20.4 (11.8, 33.1) 10 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Stone County 2 Urban 15.8 (8.9, 26.1) 33 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 22.1 (12.4, 36.6) 7 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural 15.4 (8.9, 24.8) 36 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Yazoo County 2 Urban 14.7 (9.0, 22.6) 42 (3, 59) 4
*
*
Amite County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Attala County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tate County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 11:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top