Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend ascending
Tennessee 2 N/A 17.1 (16.7, 17.5) N/A 1,428 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 73,915 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Henderson County 2 Rural 24.5 (17.7, 33.1) 6 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.9, 8.2)
Wayne County 2 Rural 28.6 (19.5, 41.1) 1 (1, 66) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 5.9)
Dyer County 2 Rural 15.6 (10.7, 21.9) 61 (7, 77) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 6.2)
Weakley County 2 Rural 18.0 (12.7, 25.0) 37 (2, 77) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.5, 6.2)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 20.1 (15.3, 26.2) 21 (2, 72) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 4.8)
Hickman County 2 Urban 26.3 (18.8, 36.0) 2 (1, 63) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 5.0)
Warren County 2 Rural 26.1 (20.1, 33.4) 3 (1, 53) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 4.9)
Franklin County 2 Rural 18.0 (13.2, 24.0) 38 (4, 76) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.8)
Smith County 2 Urban 24.5 (16.4, 35.4) 5 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.1)
Marion County 2 Urban 25.6 (18.6, 34.5) 4 (1, 61) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 4.7)
McMinn County 2 Rural 18.4 (13.9, 23.8) 34 (5, 75) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.4)
Henry County 2 Rural 17.8 (13.1, 24.1) 40 (5, 76) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 4.1)
Morgan County 2 Urban 19.5 (12.7, 29.0) 26 (1, 77) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.0, 4.6)
Williamson County 2 Urban 20.5 (18.1, 23.2) 18 (7, 50) 54 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 3.3)
Campbell County 2 Urban 20.2 (15.0, 26.9) 20 (1, 74) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 5.4)
Gibson County 2 Urban 15.9 (11.6, 21.2) 57 (9, 77) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.8)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 18.2 (14.3, 23.0) 35 (5, 73) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.8)
McNairy County 2 Rural 23.8 (16.7, 33.0) 8 (1, 71) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.2, 6.1)
Washington County 2 Urban 19.5 (16.7, 22.8) 25 (7, 59) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.4)
Cheatham County 2 Urban 22.3 (16.5, 29.6) 13 (1, 70) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.5)
Carroll County 2 Rural 19.8 (13.6, 28.1) 23 (1, 76) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.2)
Sevier County 2 Rural 18.9 (15.7, 22.7) 30 (7, 65) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.6)
Cocke County 2 Rural 16.1 (11.5, 22.1) 56 (8, 77) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 4.0)
Bedford County 2 Rural 16.2 (11.8, 21.6) 54 (8, 77) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.7)
Benton County 2 Rural 19.0 (11.3, 30.5) 29 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.7, 4.0)
Union County 2 Urban 14.8 (8.9, 23.7) 66 (4, 77) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.4, 4.4)
Giles County 2 Rural 16.6 (11.7, 23.3) 50 (6, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.5, 4.3)
White County 2 Rural 21.4 (15.3, 29.5) 16 (1, 74) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.2, 5.0)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 19.7 (17.1, 22.6) 24 (8, 58) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Bradley County 2 Urban 18.9 (15.7, 22.7) 31 (7, 67) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 18.4 (16.7, 20.4) 32 (15, 55) 85 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Marshall County 2 Rural 21.5 (15.4, 29.3) 15 (1, 73) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 3.3)
Monroe County 2 Rural 17.8 (13.1, 23.8) 39 (5, 76) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.4)
Tipton County 2 Urban 17.3 (13.1, 22.4) 44 (7, 76) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.2)
Davidson County 2 Urban 16.4 (15.0, 17.8) 53 (30, 66) 114 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Rhea County 2 Rural 23.3 (17.0, 31.2) 10 (1, 68) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.5)
Rutherford County 2 Urban 17.6 (15.5, 19.9) 41 (17, 64) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Greene County 2 Rural 15.3 (12.1, 19.2) 63 (17, 77) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.5)
Loudon County 2 Urban 17.2 (13.6, 21.6) 46 (9, 75) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Anderson County 2 Urban 19.1 (15.5, 23.3) 28 (6, 67) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.2)
Dickson County 2 Urban 14.2 (10.4, 19.2) 69 (16, 77) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.5)
Coffee County 2 Rural 17.3 (13.3, 22.3) 43 (7, 76) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.7)
Hardin County 2 Rural 16.9 (11.4, 24.4) 48 (3, 77) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.9)
Sumner County 2 Urban 20.2 (17.7, 23.1) 19 (6, 51) 47 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.9, 0.6)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 17.2 (10.9, 26.3) 45 (2, 77) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.0, 2.8)
Madison County 2 Urban 14.2 (11.3, 17.6) 70 (28, 77) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.7)
Maury County 2 Urban 18.1 (14.8, 22.0) 36 (9, 71) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.6)
Fayette County 2 Urban 13.8 (10.1, 18.8) 71 (19, 77) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.9)
Grainger County 2 Urban 22.5 (15.5, 31.9) 12 (1, 73) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.2, 2.3)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 11.5 (6.9, 18.2) 76 (19, 77) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.6, 2.5)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 19.4 (15.2, 24.4) 27 (4, 72) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-19.0, 2.7)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 13.1 (8.8, 19.2) 73 (15, 77) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.9, 2.5)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 15.3 (11.6, 20.0) 62 (13, 77) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.9)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 14.4 (11.9, 17.2) 67 (32, 76) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.8)
Putnam County 2 Rural 17.1 (13.4, 21.4) 47 (9, 74) 16 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.2)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 13.4 (9.2, 19.0) 72 (18, 77) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.9, 1.5)
Polk County 2 Urban 21.8 (14.1, 32.6) 14 (1, 76) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.7, 1.2)
Knox County 2 Urban 15.6 (14.1, 17.1) 60 (35, 71) 88 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.8, -1.3)
Roane County 2 Urban 15.7 (12.1, 20.2) 58 (14, 77) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.8, -0.2)
Robertson County 2 Urban 13.0 (9.7, 17.1) 74 (28, 77) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.5)
Shelby County 2 Urban 14.3 (13.2, 15.4) 68 (48, 74) 139 falling falling trend -2.6 (-7.0, -0.6)
Obion County 2 Rural 10.8 (6.5, 17.1) 77 (23, 77) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.2, 0.2)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 14.9 (11.5, 19.2) 65 (16, 77) 17 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.7)
Unicoi County 2 Urban 16.5 (10.3, 25.8) 51 (2, 77) 5 stable stable trend -3.6 (-28.7, 5.0)
Blount County 2 Urban 17.5 (14.9, 20.4) 42 (14, 70) 35 falling falling trend -3.8 (-9.0, -2.0)
Carter County 2 Urban 12.3 (8.9, 16.6) 75 (28, 77) 10 stable stable trend -4.2 (-26.9, 0.5)
Wilson County 2 Urban 15.0 (12.6, 17.9) 64 (26, 76) 27 falling falling trend -5.9 (-21.2, -2.6)
Decatur County 2 Rural 18.4 (10.1, 31.7) 33 (1, 77) 3 falling falling trend -13.4 (-39.2, -4.4)
Crockett County 2 Urban 23.3 (14.4, 36.3) 9 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Fentress County 2 Rural 15.6 (9.7, 24.5) 59 (3, 77) 5
*
*
Grundy County 2 Rural 16.8 (9.9, 27.7) 49 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Humphreys County 2 Rural 23.2 (15.3, 34.1) 11 (1, 75) 6
*
*
Johnson County 2 Rural 16.5 (10.1, 26.0) 52 (2, 77) 4
*
*
Macon County 2 Urban 20.1 (13.6, 28.9) 22 (1, 76) 6
*
*
Overton County 2 Rural 16.1 (9.9, 25.0) 55 (3, 77) 5
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural 21.1 (14.2, 30.5) 17 (1, 76) 6
*
*
Sequatchie County 2 Urban 24.0 (15.4, 36.2) 7 (1, 76) 5
*
*
Bledsoe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lauderdale County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 12:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top