Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 2 N/A 22.5 (22.0, 23.0) N/A 1,555 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 73,915 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Pipestone County 2 Rural 32.7 (20.0, 51.3) 1 (1, 68) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.4, 5.4)
Brown County 2 Rural 31.6 (23.6, 41.6) 2 (1, 56) 12 rising rising trend 6.8 (2.3, 22.0)
McLeod County 2 Rural 28.8 (22.5, 36.6) 3 (1, 57) 15 stable stable trend 17.2 (-0.2, 42.4)
Watonwan County 2 Rural 28.7 (16.8, 46.0) 4 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend -3.6 (-35.0, 3.2)
Pope County 2 Rural 28.3 (17.4, 44.2) 5 (1, 69) 5
*
*
Nobles County 2 Rural 28.0 (19.1, 39.5) 6 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.6)
Lake County 2 Rural 27.8 (17.8, 42.9) 7 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 6.3)
Clearwater County 2 Rural 27.1 (15.3, 45.5) 8 (1, 69) 3
*
*
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 26.9 (22.3, 32.2) 9 (1, 54) 28 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.4, 4.3)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 26.5 (18.6, 36.9) 10 (1, 67) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.1)
Todd County 2 Rural 26.4 (19.1, 35.9) 11 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.2, 4.5)
Polk County 2 Urban 26.2 (19.4, 34.9) 12 (1, 65) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.8, 4.3)
Renville County 2 Rural 26.2 (17.4, 38.5) 13 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.7)
Wright County 2 Urban 26.1 (22.5, 30.2) 14 (3, 50) 39 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.5)
Redwood County 2 Rural 25.9 (16.8, 38.7) 15 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.4, 8.1)
Wadena County 2 Rural 25.8 (17.0, 38.4) 16 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.2)
Lyon County 2 Rural 25.7 (18.4, 35.2) 17 (1, 68) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 2.6)
Steele County 2 Rural 25.6 (19.6, 33.0) 18 (1, 65) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 3.0)
Martin County 2 Rural 25.3 (17.4, 35.8) 19 (1, 68) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.1, 6.5)
Stearns County 2 Urban 25.3 (22.0, 28.9) 20 (4, 50) 45 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.3)
Washington County 2 Urban 25.1 (22.6, 27.7) 21 (7, 46) 80 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.7)
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 24.9 (18.1, 33.6) 22 (1, 67) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.2, 4.7)
Sibley County 2 Rural 24.7 (15.9, 37.1) 23 (1, 69) 5
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural 24.4 (13.7, 41.0) 24 (1, 69) 3
*
*
Goodhue County 2 Rural 24.2 (19.0, 30.4) 25 (2, 65) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.2)
Scott County 2 Urban 24.2 (20.6, 28.2) 26 (5, 59) 35 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.3)
Benton County 2 Urban 24.1 (18.0, 31.6) 27 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.3)
Winona County 2 Rural 24.0 (18.5, 30.6) 28 (2, 66) 15 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 4.9)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 23.8 (18.0, 30.9) 29 (2, 67) 12 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.7, 6.5)
Wabasha County 2 Urban 23.8 (16.9, 33.2) 30 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.4, 5.0)
Carlton County 2 Urban 23.7 (17.8, 31.0) 31 (2, 67) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 5.2)
Jackson County 2 Rural 23.7 (12.9, 40.5) 32 (1, 69) 3
*
*
Sherburne County 2 Urban 23.3 (19.0, 28.3) 33 (5, 64) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.7)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 23.1 (20.1, 26.5) 34 (9, 59) 44 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Dakota County 2 Urban 23.0 (21.1, 25.1) 35 (13, 53) 114 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 23.0 (18.6, 28.2) 36 (5, 64) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.2)
Itasca County 2 Rural 22.9 (18.2, 28.7) 37 (4, 66) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.3)
Roseau County 2 Rural 22.7 (14.7, 34.2) 38 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.4, 6.4)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 22.5 (20.0, 25.2) 39 (13, 58) 64 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Morrison County 2 Rural 22.4 (16.8, 29.6) 40 (3, 68) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.3, 5.9)
Mower County 2 Rural 22.4 (16.8, 29.3) 41 (3, 69) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 22.4 (20.7, 24.2) 42 (18, 56) 137 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 22.2 (17.1, 28.4) 43 (5, 68) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.5)
Waseca County 2 Rural 21.9 (14.0, 33.0) 44 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 3.1)
Anoka County 2 Urban 21.7 (19.7, 23.9) 45 (19, 59) 89 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.7, 1.9)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 21.5 (20.4, 22.7) 46 (29, 55) 307 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Pennington County 2 Rural 21.4 (12.4, 34.5) 47 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.8, 6.2)
Rice County 2 Rural 21.3 (16.8, 26.5) 48 (8, 68) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Isanti County 2 Urban 21.1 (15.7, 27.8) 49 (4, 69) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.7, 3.5)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 20.6 (16.0, 26.0) 50 (10, 69) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.1, 4.8)
Douglas County 2 Rural 20.5 (15.3, 27.2) 51 (6, 69) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.7)
Meeker County 2 Rural 20.2 (13.4, 29.5) 52 (3, 69) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.3, 6.3)
Pine County 2 Rural 20.2 (14.0, 28.3) 53 (5, 69) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.6, 4.1)
Dodge County 2 Urban 20.1 (12.5, 30.6) 54 (2, 69) 4
*
*
Cottonwood County 2 Rural 19.8 (11.3, 33.1) 55 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Chippewa County 2 Rural 19.8 (12.0, 31.6) 56 (2, 69) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.6, 2.5)
Carver County 2 Urban 19.7 (16.1, 23.9) 57 (15, 68) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Cass County 2 Rural 19.6 (14.2, 26.8) 58 (8, 69) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.6, 4.1)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 19.5 (13.4, 27.7) 59 (5, 69) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.2, 4.3)
Clay County 2 Urban 19.3 (14.8, 24.7) 60 (12, 69) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 4.2)
Koochiching County 2 Rural 19.0 (11.5, 31.2) 61 (2, 69) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.4, 4.4)
Chisago County 2 Urban 19.0 (14.7, 24.3) 62 (16, 69) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.5)
Houston County 2 Urban 18.6 (12.2, 27.7) 63 (5, 69) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.4)
Faribault County 2 Rural 17.8 (10.0, 29.8) 64 (3, 69) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.1, 7.2)
Becker County 2 Rural 17.7 (12.5, 24.4) 65 (13, 69) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.4, 2.6)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 17.6 (12.1, 24.8) 66 (11, 69) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.1, 2.7)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 17.0 (11.7, 24.2) 67 (13, 69) 8 falling falling trend -21.4 (-37.1, -3.5)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 16.6 (11.0, 24.8) 68 (12, 69) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 0.3)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 16.5 (11.0, 25.6) 69 (13, 69) 6 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.3, 0.7)
Big Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 10:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top