Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for New York by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York 7 N/A 20.3 (20.0, 20.6) N/A 5,021 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 73,915 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Essex County 7 Rural 15.2 (11.1, 20.6) 61 (15, 61) 10 falling falling trend -21.2 (-33.8, -3.9)
Washington County 7 Urban 15.8 (12.1, 20.3) 59 (18, 61) 14 falling falling trend -20.7 (-36.3, -1.1)
Warren County 7 Urban 17.4 (13.7, 22.0) 52 (7, 61) 17 falling falling trend -19.3 (-34.1, -1.2)
Westchester County 7 Urban 20.8 (19.7, 22.0) 32 (13, 45) 267 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.4, -0.8)
Schoharie County 7 Urban 17.2 (11.8, 24.3) 55 (2, 61) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-8.2, -1.2)
Yates County 7 Rural 20.2 (13.8, 28.7) 38 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend -2.8 (-13.5, 0.5)
Genesee County 7 Rural 18.8 (14.7, 23.9) 46 (3, 61) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-5.3, -0.7)
Seneca County 7 Rural 21.6 (15.9, 28.9) 26 (1, 61) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-8.4, 0.3)
Suffolk County 7 Urban 22.0 (21.0, 23.0) 18 (9, 36) 427 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.9, -0.2)
Onondaga County 7 Urban 19.3 (17.7, 21.0) 43 (19, 56) 119 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -1.0)
Albany County 7 Urban 20.7 (18.6, 22.9) 33 (7, 51) 81 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.7, -0.2)
Chemung County 7 Urban 19.6 (16.0, 23.8) 39 (3, 61) 23 stable stable trend -1.4 (-8.5, 0.0)
Tioga County 7 Urban 15.4 (11.4, 20.6) 60 (15, 61) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.5)
Queens County 7 Urban 17.2 (16.6, 18.0) 54 (43, 59) 498 falling falling trend -1.3 (-4.0, -0.1)
Columbia County 7 Rural 19.6 (15.7, 24.4) 40 (2, 61) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Chenango County 7 Rural 17.9 (13.4, 23.4) 51 (3, 61) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.2)
St. Lawrence County 7 Rural 16.5 (13.5, 19.9) 57 (23, 61) 23 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Wayne County 7 Urban 22.0 (18.2, 26.3) 17 (1, 56) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Oswego County 7 Urban 21.8 (18.5, 25.6) 22 (1, 54) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Cayuga County 7 Rural 17.0 (13.7, 21.0) 56 (16, 61) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Kings County 7 Urban 17.4 (16.7, 18.1) 53 (42, 58) 509 falling falling trend -0.9 (-3.7, -0.2)
Ontario County 7 Urban 19.6 (16.6, 23.1) 41 (6, 59) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 1.2)
Putnam County 7 Urban 22.8 (19.2, 26.9) 12 (1, 52) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 1.1)
Sullivan County 7 Rural 18.5 (14.9, 22.7) 49 (5, 61) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Delaware County 7 Rural 21.9 (17.1, 27.8) 19 (1, 59) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Nassau County 7 Urban 23.4 (22.4, 24.5) 6 (3, 23) 423 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 0.1)
Bronx County 7 Urban 18.1 (17.1, 19.0) 50 (37, 57) 275 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Livingston County 7 Urban 18.5 (14.3, 23.7) 48 (3, 61) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
New York County 7 Urban 20.9 (20.0, 21.8) 30 (15, 42) 428 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.3, -0.3)
Tompkins County 7 Urban 19.3 (15.8, 23.4) 42 (4, 60) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Dutchess County 7 Urban 19.1 (17.1, 21.1) 45 (17, 58) 77 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Fulton County 7 Rural 21.2 (16.6, 26.9) 29 (1, 60) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Steuben County 7 Rural 15.9 (12.9, 19.5) 58 (28, 61) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Chautauqua County 7 Rural 19.3 (16.3, 22.6) 44 (7, 60) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 21.9 (17.2, 27.5) 21 (1, 60) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Orange County 7 Urban 20.9 (19.0, 22.9) 31 (7, 49) 92 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.0)
Rockland County 7 Urban 23.8 (21.6, 26.2) 3 (1, 35) 89 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Lewis County 7 Rural 21.8 (14.9, 30.8) 25 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 3.0)
Otsego County 7 Rural 21.6 (17.2, 27.0) 27 (1, 60) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Saratoga County 7 Urban 23.4 (21.1, 26.0) 5 (1, 39) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Schuyler County 7 Rural 25.1 (17.4, 35.8) 2 (1, 61) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.5)
Monroe County 7 Urban 21.8 (20.5, 23.2) 23 (6, 40) 211 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Schenectady County 7 Urban 23.1 (20.1, 26.4) 9 (1, 46) 46 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Clinton County 7 Rural 20.5 (16.6, 25.2) 35 (2, 60) 21 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.3)
Richmond County 7 Urban 23.0 (21.2, 24.8) 10 (2, 36) 139 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1)
Niagara County 7 Urban 22.1 (19.6, 24.8) 16 (2, 47) 65 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Oneida County 7 Urban 22.8 (20.3, 25.4) 13 (2, 42) 69 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Cattaraugus County 7 Rural 21.8 (17.9, 26.4) 24 (1, 58) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.2)
Franklin County 7 Rural 20.3 (15.4, 26.5) 36 (1, 61) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.8)
Rensselaer County 7 Urban 22.2 (19.3, 25.4) 15 (2, 49) 45 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.2)
Ulster County 7 Urban 21.5 (18.9, 24.3) 28 (2, 50) 54 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.8)
Allegany County 7 Rural 18.6 (14.1, 24.4) 47 (2, 61) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.3)
Broome County 7 Urban 20.2 (17.8, 22.9) 37 (7, 56) 55 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Greene County 7 Rural 23.3 (18.4, 29.2) 8 (1, 57) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.8)
Herkimer County 7 Urban 20.6 (16.4, 25.7) 34 (1, 60) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.7)
Erie County 7 Urban 21.9 (20.7, 23.1) 20 (7, 38) 273 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Orleans County 7 Urban 28.0 (21.8, 35.5) 1 (1, 47) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.7)
Cortland County 7 Rural 22.5 (17.2, 29.0) 14 (1, 61) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 4.1)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 23.5 (19.7, 27.8) 4 (1, 50) 29 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.4)
Wyoming County 7 Rural 22.9 (17.5, 29.8) 11 (1, 59) 13 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.8)
Madison County 7 Urban 23.3 (18.9, 28.5) 7 (1, 57) 21 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.9)
Hamilton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 9:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top