Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 N/A 17.6 (17.4, 17.9) N/A 5,225 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 73,915 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
DeWitt County 7 Rural 15.8 (9.9, 24.4) 107 (3, 144) 5 stable stable trend -22.8 (-52.9, 1.1)
Colorado County 7 Rural 12.3 (7.5, 19.6) 141 (16, 144) 4 falling falling trend -21.3 (-50.8, -3.2)
Hale County 7 Rural 11.4 (6.9, 17.7) 143 (28, 144) 4 falling falling trend -5.7 (-9.2, -3.6)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 16.1 (9.6, 25.5) 101 (2, 144) 4 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.9, -2.7)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 14.2 (9.9, 20.1) 133 (12, 144) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.8, -0.1)
Navarro County 7 Rural 16.3 (12.1, 21.7) 95 (7, 143) 10 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -0.5)
Collin County 7 Urban 18.1 (16.9, 19.3) 62 (29, 103) 185 falling falling trend -3.0 (-7.9, -1.0)
Young County 7 Rural 13.7 (7.7, 22.8) 137 (3, 144) 3 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.1, 1.0)
Coryell County 7 Urban 12.1 (8.7, 16.3) 142 (49, 144) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -0.8)
Erath County 7 Rural 14.1 (9.5, 20.1) 134 (12, 144) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.2, -0.1)
Bandera County 7 Urban 13.4 (8.5, 20.9) 138 (12, 144) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.6, 1.1)
Caldwell County 7 Urban 13.3 (9.2, 18.7) 139 (20, 144) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 1.5)
San Patricio County 7 Urban 17.7 (13.6, 22.6) 71 (6, 141) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.2)
Hardin County 7 Urban 20.3 (15.8, 25.9) 22 (2, 130) 14 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.3)
Nacogdoches County 7 Rural 16.2 (12.2, 21.0) 100 (9, 143) 12 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.3)
Lamar County 7 Rural 17.5 (13.2, 22.9) 77 (5, 141) 12 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
Leon County 7 Rural 15.0 (9.1, 24.2) 122 (4, 144) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.7, 1.9)
Milam County 7 Rural 16.5 (10.6, 24.6) 91 (3, 144) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.4, 1.5)
Burnet County 7 Rural 15.1 (11.1, 20.1) 120 (12, 144) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.6)
Gregg County 7 Urban 16.0 (13.2, 19.3) 103 (21, 140) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Hunt County 7 Urban 14.8 (11.8, 18.3) 123 (27, 142) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Nueces County 7 Urban 15.7 (14.0, 17.5) 113 (48, 133) 64 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Hays County 7 Urban 14.7 (12.4, 17.2) 125 (45, 140) 33 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 1.3)
Llano County 7 Rural 14.2 (8.7, 22.6) 131 (3, 144) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 1.6)
Montgomery County 7 Urban 18.1 (16.6, 19.7) 60 (24, 105) 116 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.6, 0.1)
Randall County 7 Urban 17.1 (14.3, 20.3) 82 (15, 132) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Denton County 7 Urban 17.4 (16.1, 18.7) 80 (36, 110) 151 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.1)
Gray County 7 Rural 19.3 (12.4, 28.8) 38 (1, 144) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.8, 2.0)
Hockley County 7 Urban 15.1 (9.1, 23.8) 121 (3, 144) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.9)
Jackson County 7 Rural 17.4 (10.2, 28.2) 79 (1, 144) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.1, 2.8)
Lubbock County 7 Urban 15.9 (13.9, 18.1) 108 (41, 134) 47 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Midland County 7 Urban 16.2 (13.4, 19.4) 99 (23, 138) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.4)
Potter County 7 Urban 15.5 (12.5, 19.0) 117 (27, 142) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.4)
Travis County 7 Urban 18.1 (17.0, 19.3) 59 (30, 98) 204 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.5, 0.4)
Upshur County 7 Urban 16.5 (11.8, 22.5) 89 (4, 144) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.3, 1.8)
Angelina County 7 Rural 17.0 (13.5, 21.1) 83 (10, 140) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Brown County 7 Rural 17.6 (12.5, 24.2) 73 (3, 143) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.6)
Fort Bend County 7 Urban 16.8 (15.5, 18.2) 84 (40, 116) 136 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Harris County 7 Urban 17.6 (17.0, 18.1) 75 (49, 94) 764 falling falling trend -1.2 (-3.6, -0.7)
Kaufman County 7 Urban 19.0 (15.7, 22.7) 44 (5, 129) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.4)
Robertson County 7 Urban 18.1 (11.4, 27.9) 61 (1, 144) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 2.0)
Wichita County 7 Urban 16.2 (13.4, 19.5) 97 (20, 140) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Williamson County 7 Urban 17.5 (16.0, 19.1) 78 (30, 114) 108 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.1, 0.1)
Brazoria County 7 Urban 18.5 (16.5, 20.6) 51 (17, 110) 70 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.2)
Smith County 7 Urban 17.5 (15.4, 19.9) 74 (19, 122) 50 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.3)
Tarrant County 7 Urban 18.8 (18.0, 19.7) 47 (27, 79) 383 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.8, -0.6)
Falls County 7 Urban 14.4 (8.3, 23.7) 129 (3, 144) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.6, 3.7)
Freestone County 7 Rural 15.8 (9.5, 24.9) 110 (2, 144) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 3.0)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 16.4 (14.3, 18.7) 93 (29, 131) 47 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Titus County 7 Rural 13.1 (8.3, 19.9) 140 (10, 144) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.2, 2.4)
Webb County 7 Urban 14.7 (12.5, 17.2) 124 (44, 140) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.4)
Anderson County 7 Rural 15.5 (11.5, 20.6) 116 (11, 144) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.2)
Aransas County 7 Urban 14.3 (9.0, 22.1) 128 (5, 144) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 2.8)
Bosque County 7 Urban 19.5 (12.8, 29.0) 36 (1, 144) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.9, 3.4)
Rockwall County 7 Urban 16.4 (13.1, 20.3) 92 (12, 139) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.6)
Victoria County 7 Urban 20.4 (16.6, 24.7) 21 (3, 123) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.8)
Walker County 7 Rural 23.9 (19.3, 29.3) 4 (1, 90) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 2.1)
Bell County 7 Urban 17.8 (15.8, 20.0) 69 (20, 119) 60 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.3)
Brazos County 7 Urban 16.6 (13.9, 19.6) 86 (19, 135) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.3)
Cooke County 7 Rural 20.8 (15.6, 27.2) 17 (1, 139) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 2.9)
Dallas County 7 Urban 18.3 (17.6, 19.1) 55 (34, 85) 445 falling falling trend -0.8 (-2.4, -0.4)
Galveston County 7 Urban 17.5 (15.7, 19.6) 76 (22, 118) 69 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.2)
Wise County 7 Urban 14.7 (11.0, 19.2) 127 (24, 144) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.8)
Austin County 7 Urban 16.2 (11.3, 22.7) 98 (5, 144) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.6, 5.0)
Ellis County 7 Urban 19.6 (16.9, 22.7) 32 (7, 113) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 1.0)
Hidalgo County 7 Urban 15.3 (14.1, 16.6) 119 (72, 131) 120 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.5)
Wharton County 7 Rural 16.0 (11.4, 21.9) 102 (7, 144) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.8)
Bee County 7 Rural 13.7 (8.4, 21.0) 136 (7, 144) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.0, 4.1)
Comal County 7 Urban 18.8 (16.2, 21.7) 48 (9, 117) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 1.0)
Palo Pinto County 7 Rural 18.4 (12.3, 26.5) 52 (2, 144) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Panola County 7 Rural 15.7 (9.9, 24.0) 114 (3, 144) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.4)
Washington County 7 Rural 18.6 (13.5, 25.1) 50 (3, 141) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.9)
Bexar County 7 Urban 18.4 (17.6, 19.3) 53 (31, 86) 363 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Cameron County 7 Urban 15.7 (14.1, 17.5) 111 (52, 131) 69 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.8)
Ector County 7 Urban 18.9 (15.8, 22.6) 46 (7, 124) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.7)
Jasper County 7 Rural 13.8 (9.3, 19.9) 135 (13, 144) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.3)
Johnson County 7 Urban 19.2 (16.5, 22.2) 40 (8, 113) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.9)
Lavaca County 7 Rural 18.1 (12.4, 26.2) 64 (2, 143) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 3.1)
McLennan County 7 Urban 18.6 (16.3, 21.0) 49 (13, 118) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Moore County 7 Rural 15.6 (8.8, 25.5) 115 (1, 144) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.6, 4.4)
Cass County 7 Rural 22.3 (16.1, 30.4) 6 (1, 136) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 2.9)
El Paso County 7 Urban 15.4 (14.2, 16.6) 118 (72, 130) 131 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Lampasas County 7 Urban 18.0 (12.0, 26.4) 65 (2, 144) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.9)
Orange County 7 Urban 17.6 (14.1, 21.8) 72 (9, 137) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.7)
Taylor County 7 Urban 18.0 (15.0, 21.4) 66 (11, 131) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Wood County 7 Rural 21.8 (16.9, 27.8) 7 (1, 123) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.2)
Gillespie County 7 Rural 20.5 (14.6, 28.5) 20 (1, 140) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.8)
Guadalupe County 7 Urban 19.1 (16.4, 22.1) 43 (8, 118) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Jim Wells County 7 Rural 14.3 (9.6, 20.5) 130 (10, 144) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 3.3)
San Jacinto County 7 Urban 20.1 (14.0, 28.4) 24 (1, 141) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 3.3)
Bastrop County 7 Urban 18.9 (15.4, 23.1) 45 (6, 129) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Chambers County 7 Urban 19.2 (13.6, 26.3) 41 (2, 142) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 3.5)
Shelby County 7 Rural 16.5 (10.8, 24.4) 90 (3, 144) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.5)
Wilson County 7 Urban 19.7 (14.9, 25.5) 30 (2, 137) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.6)
Parker County 7 Urban 20.8 (17.8, 24.2) 15 (4, 102) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 2.2)
Van Zandt County 7 Rural 19.1 (15.2, 23.9) 42 (4, 131) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.4)
Howard County 7 Rural 14.6 (9.4, 21.5) 126 (7, 144) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.7, 5.1)
Kendall County 7 Urban 20.1 (15.3, 26.1) 27 (2, 135) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 3.4)
Tyler County 7 Rural 18.1 (11.0, 28.1) 63 (1, 144) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.1)
Waller County 7 Urban 16.5 (11.7, 22.5) 87 (4, 144) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.9)
Bowie County 7 Urban 18.1 (14.7, 22.1) 58 (8, 133) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.4)
Liberty County 7 Urban 19.5 (15.6, 24.2) 34 (3, 128) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.5)
Henderson County 7 Rural 21.5 (17.7, 26.0) 8 (2, 106) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.2)
Grayson County 7 Urban 21.1 (18.1, 24.6) 12 (3, 98) 36 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.1)
Hill County 7 Rural 20.8 (15.5, 27.5) 16 (1, 135) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 4.0)
Hood County 7 Rural 19.5 (15.5, 24.4) 35 (3, 130) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 3.2)
Fayette County 7 Rural 15.8 (10.8, 22.8) 109 (5, 144) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.3)
Polk County 7 Rural 29.3 (22.9, 37.1) 2 (1, 45) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.8)
Grimes County 7 Rural 20.1 (14.1, 28.0) 25 (1, 141) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 3.1)
Matagorda County 7 Rural 20.2 (14.5, 27.5) 23 (2, 139) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.9)
Medina County 7 Urban 17.8 (13.4, 23.2) 70 (5, 142) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 3.3)
Tom Green County 7 Urban 20.6 (17.2, 24.4) 19 (3, 111) 28 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.1)
Val Verde County 7 Rural 17.3 (12.3, 23.5) 81 (3, 143) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.9)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 19.7 (15.0, 25.4) 31 (3, 137) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.4)
Harrison County 7 Urban 18.4 (14.4, 23.3) 54 (4, 136) 15 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.5)
Red River County 7 Rural 16.0 (9.2, 27.3) 105 (2, 144) 3 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.4, 6.6)
Starr County 7 Rural 16.0 (11.6, 21.3) 104 (9, 143) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 6.0)
Fannin County 7 Rural 20.7 (15.2, 27.6) 18 (1, 135) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 5.2)
Montague County 7 Rural 18.1 (11.6, 27.3) 67 (2, 144) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 5.6)
Rusk County 7 Urban 19.8 (15.1, 25.5) 29 (2, 135) 13 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 4.0)
Maverick County 7 Urban 18.2 (13.4, 24.2) 56 (3, 141) 10 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.9)
Callahan County 7 Urban 19.9 (11.6, 32.3) 28 (1, 144) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 6.0)
Trinity County 7 Rural 17.9 (9.3, 31.3) 68 (1, 144) 3 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.1, 6.6)
Kerr County 7 Rural 21.5 (17.0, 26.9) 10 (1, 120) 20 stable stable trend 9.1 (-1.2, 31.8)
Archer County 7 Urban 33.4 (19.3, 54.3) 1 (1, 139) 4
*
*
Atascosa County 7 Urban 16.5 (12.1, 22.2) 88 (7, 143) 9
*
*
Blanco County 7 Rural 16.3 (8.8, 29.0) 96 (1, 144) 3
*
*
Burleson County 7 Urban 23.5 (15.1, 35.2) 5 (1, 140) 6
*
*
Eastland County 7 Rural 21.0 (13.2, 31.9) 14 (1, 144) 5
*
*
Frio County 7 Rural 18.2 (10.4, 29.8) 57 (1, 144) 3
*
*
Gonzales County 7 Rural 16.6 (10.1, 26.0) 85 (2, 144) 4
*
*
Houston County 7 Rural 19.7 (13.1, 28.7) 33 (1, 143) 6
*
*
Hutchinson County 7 Rural 25.3 (17.0, 36.4) 3 (1, 134) 6
*
*
Karnes County 7 Rural 20.1 (11.3, 32.9) 26 (1, 144) 3
*
*
Kleberg County 7 Rural 15.7 (10.0, 23.6) 112 (3, 144) 5
*
*
Lee County 7 Rural 16.4 (9.3, 27.0) 94 (1, 144) 3
*
*
Limestone County 7 Rural 11.3 (6.5, 18.4) 144 (27, 144) 4
*
*
Morris County 7 Rural 19.3 (11.0, 32.2) 39 (1, 144) 4
*
*
Newton County 7 Rural 21.1 (12.2, 34.7) 13 (1, 144) 4
*
*
Nolan County 7 Rural 21.3 (12.8, 33.6) 9 (1, 144) 4
*
*
Rains County 7 Rural 14.3 (7.8, 25.3) 132 (2, 144) 3
*
*
Scurry County 7 Rural 19.5 (11.3, 31.5) 37 (1, 144) 3
*
*
Uvalde County 7 Rural 15.9 (9.9, 24.3) 106 (2, 144) 5
*
*
Willacy County 7 Rural 21.2 (13.5, 31.8) 11 (1, 144) 5
*
*
Andrews County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 7:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top