Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

Leukemia (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Baldwin County 7 Rural 16.5 (11.9, 22.5) 25 (2, 92) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.5)
Barrow County 7 Urban 15.3 (11.6, 19.7) 42 (6, 89) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 4.1)
Bartow County 7 Urban 12.3 (9.6, 15.6) 80 (24, 93) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.5)
Ben Hill County 7 Rural 22.1 (13.8, 33.7) 3 (1, 90) 5
*
*
Bibb County 7 Urban 11.9 (9.7, 14.5) 83 (32, 93) 22 falling falling trend -8.9 (-23.5, -1.5)
Bryan County 7 Urban 10.1 (6.2, 15.6) 92 (19, 94) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.7, 5.7)
Bulloch County 7 Rural 14.1 (10.4, 18.8) 59 (8, 93) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 4.1)
Butts County 7 Urban 15.3 (9.5, 23.5) 41 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.0, 10.6)
Camden County 7 Rural 19.8 (14.8, 26.0) 8 (1, 79) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 6.4)
Carroll County 7 Urban 18.1 (14.8, 21.9) 19 (3, 72) 22 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.1, 4.9)
Catoosa County 7 Urban 8.3 (5.8, 11.7) 94 (66, 94) 7 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.2, 0.5)
Chatham County 7 Urban 11.9 (10.2, 13.7) 85 (46, 92) 40 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.6)
Cherokee County 7 Urban 18.3 (16.1, 20.7) 16 (5, 48) 54 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.6)
Clarke County 7 Urban 10.0 (7.6, 13.1) 93 (49, 94) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.6)
Clayton County 7 Urban 13.7 (11.5, 16.1) 68 (24, 89) 34 stable stable trend -9.5 (-20.8, 2.1)
Cobb County 7 Urban 13.5 (12.4, 14.8) 70 (35, 81) 104 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 2.1)
Coffee County 7 Rural 19.7 (14.2, 26.7) 9 (1, 85) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 6.3)
Colquitt County 7 Rural 21.7 (16.4, 28.3) 4 (1, 63) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.6)
Columbia County 7 Urban 15.4 (12.8, 18.5) 38 (10, 81) 25 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 3.3)
Cook County 7 Rural 18.0 (10.8, 28.7) 18 (1, 94) 4
*
*
Coweta County 7 Urban 18.5 (15.6, 21.9) 15 (3, 58) 30 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 4.3)
Dade County 7 Urban 16.5 (9.2, 27.5) 26 (1, 94) 3
*
*
Dawson County 7 Urban 20.5 (14.2, 29.0) 6 (1, 84) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 3.5)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 13.2 (12.0, 14.4) 71 (40, 84) 100 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.5, 2.1)
Dodge County 7 Rural 13.5 (8.1, 21.6) 69 (3, 94) 4
*
*
Dougherty County 7 Urban 12.6 (9.5, 16.3) 78 (17, 94) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.7)
Douglas County 7 Urban 14.0 (11.2, 17.2) 62 (14, 91) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.7)
Effingham County 7 Urban 17.0 (12.7, 22.1) 23 (3, 87) 12 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.8, 7.8)
Elbert County 7 Rural 17.0 (10.2, 26.8) 21 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.4, 3.5)
Emanuel County 7 Rural 16.3 (9.8, 25.5) 27 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 4.9)
Fannin County 7 Rural 15.6 (10.6, 22.8) 35 (2, 93) 8
*
*
Fayette County 7 Urban 14.2 (11.6, 17.2) 57 (16, 88) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 2.2)
Floyd County 7 Urban 14.7 (11.7, 18.4) 47 (9, 89) 17 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.5, 5.2)
Forsyth County 7 Urban 15.5 (13.4, 17.9) 36 (12, 79) 39 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.6)
Franklin County 7 Rural 19.0 (11.9, 28.7) 12 (1, 94) 5
*
*
Fulton County 7 Urban 15.1 (14.1, 16.3) 45 (25, 65) 155 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 2.1)
Gilmer County 7 Rural 18.1 (12.6, 25.4) 17 (1, 89) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 5.8)
Glynn County 7 Urban 12.1 (9.5, 15.3) 81 (28, 94) 16 stable stable trend -6.4 (-18.7, 8.5)
Gordon County 7 Rural 15.9 (11.8, 21.0) 31 (4, 90) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 2.4)
Grady County 7 Rural 12.8 (7.8, 20.0) 75 (4, 94) 4
*
*
Greene County 7 Rural 11.3 (7.1, 18.4) 90 (11, 94) 5
*
*
Gwinnett County 7 Urban 14.3 (13.1, 15.6) 54 (29, 74) 123 stable stable trend -1.6 (-9.1, 1.2)
Habersham County 7 Rural 14.7 (10.5, 20.1) 49 (5, 93) 9 stable stable trend -20.8 (-39.2, 1.6)
Hall County 7 Urban 15.4 (13.2, 17.9) 37 (13, 77) 35 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.3, 1.1)
Haralson County 7 Urban 15.8 (10.5, 23.1) 32 (2, 94) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.6, 5.5)
Harris County 7 Urban 16.2 (11.0, 23.0) 29 (2, 93) 7
*
*
Hart County 7 Rural 14.4 (9.1, 22.0) 55 (3, 94) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.9)
Henry County 7 Urban 14.3 (12.1, 16.8) 53 (17, 86) 33 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 3.2)
Houston County 7 Urban 14.4 (11.9, 17.3) 52 (14, 88) 24 falling falling trend -15.5 (-27.6, -0.5)
Jackson County 7 Rural 12.9 (9.7, 17.0) 73 (14, 94) 11 falling falling trend -5.2 (-16.9, -0.8)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 19.9 (11.4, 32.2) 10 (1, 94) 4
*
*
Jones County 7 Urban 10.7 (6.4, 17.0) 91 (14, 94) 4
*
*
Laurens County 7 Rural 14.1 (10.0, 19.4) 60 (7, 94) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2)
Lee County 7 Urban 13.1 (8.1, 20.1) 72 (4, 94) 5
*
*
Liberty County 7 Urban 13.8 (9.4, 19.5) 64 (4, 94) 7 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.6, 9.3)
Lowndes County 7 Urban 15.7 (12.6, 19.5) 33 (6, 86) 18 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 4.2)
Lumpkin County 7 Urban 13.9 (9.0, 20.6) 63 (4, 94) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 2.1)
Madison County 7 Urban 14.5 (9.5, 21.5) 51 (2, 94) 5 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.4, 8.5)
McDuffie County 7 Urban 14.6 (8.5, 23.5) 50 (1, 94) 4
*
*
Meriwether County 7 Urban 17.0 (10.3, 26.5) 22 (1, 94) 5 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.7, 7.1)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 20.1 (12.9, 30.0) 7 (1, 92) 5
*
*
Monroe County 7 Urban 15.4 (10.3, 22.5) 39 (2, 94) 6
*
*
Morgan County 7 Urban 13.7 (7.7, 22.8) 66 (1, 94) 3
*
*
Murray County 7 Urban 18.8 (13.6, 25.4) 13 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 5.2)
Muscogee County 7 Urban 18.7 (16.2, 21.5) 14 (3, 48) 41 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.7, 4.5)
Newton County 7 Urban 15.1 (12.1, 18.7) 44 (8, 87) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 5.6)
Oconee County 7 Urban 11.4 (7.6, 16.6) 88 (15, 94) 6
*
*
Paulding County 7 Urban 11.6 (9.3, 14.2) 87 (36, 93) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 1.1)
Peach County 7 Urban 13.8 (8.5, 21.3) 65 (3, 94) 4
*
*
Pickens County 7 Urban 26.6 (19.8, 35.2) 1 (1, 37) 12 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.0, 6.5)
Pierce County 7 Rural 14.2 (8.3, 22.9) 56 (2, 94) 4
*
*
Pike County 7 Urban 21.3 (13.5, 32.1) 5 (1, 91) 5
*
*
Polk County 7 Rural 12.8 (8.6, 18.3) 76 (8, 94) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.3, 6.3)
Putnam County 7 Rural 14.1 (8.9, 21.8) 58 (3, 94) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 3.6)
Richmond County 7 Urban 13.7 (11.5, 16.2) 67 (21, 88) 30 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.8)
Rockdale County 7 Urban 12.9 (9.9, 16.5) 74 (18, 93) 13 stable stable trend -10.2 (-28.3, 0.3)
Spalding County 7 Urban 19.5 (15.3, 24.5) 11 (1, 69) 16 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 3.9)
Stephens County 7 Rural 12.3 (7.7, 19.0) 79 (7, 94) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.6)
Sumter County 7 Rural 12.0 (7.3, 18.7) 82 (7, 94) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 4.2)
Thomas County 7 Rural 11.8 (8.1, 16.9) 84 (13, 94) 7 falling falling trend -11.2 (-27.1, -0.9)
Tift County 7 Rural 15.1 (10.5, 21.1) 46 (4, 93) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-9.0, 1.5)
Toombs County 7 Rural 14.7 (9.1, 22.5) 48 (2, 94) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 5.1)
Towns County 7 Rural 16.1 (8.6, 29.1) 30 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.0, 9.0)
Troup County 7 Rural 14.0 (10.4, 18.3) 61 (8, 93) 11 stable stable trend -5.1 (-20.1, 0.2)
Union County 7 Rural 16.7 (11.5, 24.1) 24 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 4.0)
Upson County 7 Rural 17.9 (11.9, 25.9) 20 (1, 93) 6
*
*
Walker County 7 Urban 11.8 (8.8, 15.7) 86 (21, 94) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.7)
Walton County 7 Urban 15.7 (12.5, 19.5) 34 (7, 86) 18 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 4.7)
Ware County 7 Rural 11.4 (7.2, 17.2) 89 (13, 94) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.3)
Washington County 7 Rural 15.3 (9.5, 23.8) 40 (1, 94) 4
*
*
Wayne County 7 Rural 23.0 (16.2, 31.8) 2 (1, 81) 8
*
*
White County 7 Rural 15.3 (9.9, 22.9) 43 (2, 94) 6
*
*
Whitfield County 7 Urban 16.2 (13.0, 19.9) 28 (5, 82) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.7)
Worth County 7 Urban 12.6 (7.0, 21.0) 77 (2, 94) 3
*
*
Appling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atkinson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bacon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banks County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Berrien County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bleckley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brantley County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burke County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Candler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattooga County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinch County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crisp County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dooly County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Early County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Evans County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Heard County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irwin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jenkins County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lanier County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oglethorpe County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rabun County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Screven County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Talbot County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tattnall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Telfair County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Turner County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Twiggs County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 3:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top