Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Leukemia (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Minnesota 2 N/A 17.0 (16.6, 17.5) N/A 1,150 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 14.3 (14.2, 14.3) N/A 55,515 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.8)
Cass County 2 Rural 12.1 (8.4, 17.6) 59 (23, 59) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.8, 5.1)
Todd County 2 Rural 12.1 (7.4, 19.1) 58 (11, 59) 4
*
*
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 12.7 (9.3, 17.1) 57 (21, 59) 9 falling falling trend -11.5 (-41.3, -1.0)
Carlton County 2 Urban 13.9 (9.4, 19.9) 56 (9, 59) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.7)
Steele County 2 Rural 13.9 (9.5, 19.8) 55 (9, 59) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.4, 4.6)
Stearns County 2 Urban 14.2 (11.9, 16.9) 54 (24, 59) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.0)
Polk County 2 Urban 14.7 (9.7, 21.5) 53 (6, 59) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.5, 4.4)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 14.8 (10.5, 20.2) 52 (10, 59) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.2, 4.1)
Meeker County 2 Rural 14.9 (9.5, 22.6) 51 (4, 59) 5
*
*
Wright County 2 Urban 15.0 (12.3, 18.2) 50 (17, 59) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.7)
Carver County 2 Urban 15.4 (12.2, 19.1) 49 (12, 58) 17 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 1.0)
Roseau County 2 Rural 15.7 (8.9, 26.3) 48 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.9, 6.9)
Houston County 2 Urban 15.8 (9.7, 24.9) 47 (2, 59) 5
*
*
Ramsey County 2 Urban 16.0 (14.6, 17.5) 46 (23, 53) 96 falling falling trend -2.8 (-9.9, -0.2)
Becker County 2 Rural 16.2 (11.4, 22.4) 45 (5, 59) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 2.4)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 16.4 (12.7, 21.0) 44 (7, 58) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.1, 4.9)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 16.5 (15.5, 17.5) 43 (23, 49) 228 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Douglas County 2 Rural 16.5 (11.9, 22.6) 42 (4, 59) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 5.2)
Koochiching County 2 Rural 16.7 (9.8, 28.3) 41 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.8, 7.2)
Clay County 2 Urban 16.8 (12.6, 21.8) 40 (6, 59) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 2.7)
Dakota County 2 Urban 16.8 (15.2, 18.6) 39 (16, 50) 81 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.0, 0.6)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 16.9 (14.3, 19.8) 38 (11, 55) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 16.9 (11.0, 25.0) 37 (2, 59) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.6, 5.7)
Chisago County 2 Urban 17.1 (12.8, 22.5) 36 (4, 58) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 6.4)
Morrison County 2 Rural 17.2 (12.0, 24.2) 35 (3, 59) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.0, 5.0)
Brown County 2 Rural 17.2 (11.5, 25.1) 34 (2, 59) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.7, 3.6)
Kanabec County 2 Rural 17.4 (10.4, 27.8) 33 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.9, 7.3)
Wadena County 2 Rural 17.5 (10.4, 28.3) 32 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.0, 6.8)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 17.7 (13.4, 23.1) 31 (4, 58) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.2, 4.2)
Pine County 2 Rural 17.7 (12.0, 25.3) 30 (1, 59) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.9, 6.3)
Washington County 2 Urban 17.8 (15.8, 20.1) 29 (10, 49) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.9)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 17.9 (15.6, 20.5) 28 (8, 51) 48 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.3)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 17.9 (12.3, 25.4) 27 (2, 59) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.4)
Isanti County 2 Urban 18.0 (13.1, 24.2) 26 (2, 59) 9 stable stable trend -4.1 (-29.2, 3.4)
McLeod County 2 Rural 18.0 (13.1, 24.5) 25 (2, 59) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 5.0)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 18.1 (12.5, 25.4) 24 (1, 59) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.7)
Scott County 2 Urban 18.2 (15.1, 21.7) 23 (6, 53) 26 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.8)
Rice County 2 Rural 18.2 (14.2, 23.1) 22 (4, 57) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.6)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 18.4 (11.3, 29.5) 21 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-13.2, 4.1)
Swift County 2 Rural 18.7 (10.4, 32.5) 20 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Itasca County 2 Rural 18.9 (14.4, 24.5) 19 (2, 57) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.6)
Wabasha County 2 Urban 18.9 (12.6, 27.8) 18 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.8, 4.5)
Anoka County 2 Urban 18.9 (17.0, 21.0) 17 (8, 42) 76 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.4)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 19.3 (14.2, 25.7) 16 (1, 57) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 6.1)
Benton County 2 Urban 19.5 (14.0, 26.6) 15 (1, 58) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.3)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 19.7 (12.9, 29.2) 14 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.8, 5.2)
Pennington County 2 Rural 20.0 (11.8, 32.2) 13 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Sherburne County 2 Urban 20.0 (16.0, 24.8) 12 (2, 51) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.8)
Nobles County 2 Rural 20.6 (13.5, 30.3) 11 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.5, 6.4)
Winona County 2 Rural 21.1 (16.2, 27.2) 10 (1, 53) 13 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.5)
Waseca County 2 Rural 21.3 (13.9, 31.6) 9 (1, 58) 5
*
*
Mower County 2 Rural 21.8 (16.2, 28.8) 8 (1, 53) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.1, 5.8)
Lyon County 2 Rural 21.9 (14.8, 31.2) 7 (1, 57) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 6.9)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 23.2 (16.4, 31.9) 6 (1, 54) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.6, 4.2)
Renville County 2 Rural 23.3 (14.5, 36.1) 5 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.1, 4.8)
Dodge County 2 Urban 23.5 (15.5, 34.3) 4 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.9, 5.4)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 23.8 (19.4, 28.9) 3 (1, 32) 24 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.3, 8.4)
Redwood County 2 Rural 25.1 (16.2, 37.6) 2 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend 4.0 (0.0, 9.2)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 26.5 (17.9, 38.0) 1 (1, 54) 8 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.1, 7.0)
Big Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 2:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top