Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Leukemia (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
West Virginia 2 N/A 15.7 (14.9, 16.4) N/A 382 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 14.3 (14.2, 14.3) N/A 55,515 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.8)
Mason County 2 Rural 17.5 (11.9, 25.1) 11 (1, 37) 7 falling falling trend -31.5 (-50.7, -5.3)
Preston County 2 Urban 11.8 (7.8, 17.4) 36 (10, 38) 6 falling falling trend -14.8 (-35.4, -0.8)
Boone County 2 Urban 16.6 (10.2, 25.7) 18 (1, 38) 5 falling falling trend -7.0 (-26.7, -1.5)
Brooke County 2 Urban 10.9 (6.1, 18.4) 37 (7, 38) 3 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.7, 0.7)
Wyoming County 2 Rural 17.0 (10.9, 25.8) 13 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.2, 1.6)
Fayette County 2 Urban 16.7 (12.0, 22.7) 15 (2, 37) 9 stable stable trend -2.5 (-14.4, 0.7)
Greenbrier County 2 Rural 16.6 (11.3, 23.7) 17 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.1, 1.6)
Mercer County 2 Rural 15.3 (11.7, 19.9) 21 (5, 37) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.0)
Upshur County 2 Rural 15.3 (9.5, 23.7) 20 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.2, 4.1)
Wood County 2 Urban 13.1 (10.3, 16.6) 33 (12, 38) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Logan County 2 Rural 14.1 (9.6, 20.3) 28 (4, 38) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 2.8)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 13.1 (9.5, 17.7) 34 (9, 38) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.8)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 22.6 (15.2, 32.7) 3 (1, 33) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.6)
Mingo County 2 Rural 16.0 (10.3, 24.1) 19 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.5, 4.8)
Berkeley County 2 Urban 14.0 (11.3, 17.3) 30 (10, 37) 19 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.8)
Mineral County 2 Rural 14.3 (9.6, 21.1) 26 (3, 38) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.8, 4.6)
Cabell County 2 Urban 14.3 (11.4, 17.7) 27 (8, 37) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 3.8)
Monongalia County 2 Urban 15.1 (11.8, 19.1) 22 (6, 36) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.7)
Kanawha County 2 Urban 14.7 (12.6, 17.2) 25 (11, 35) 38 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Harrison County 2 Rural 17.9 (14.1, 22.4) 9 (2, 32) 17 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.1)
Ohio County 2 Urban 12.5 (8.6, 17.7) 35 (9, 38) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.4, 6.2)
Nicholas County 2 Rural 20.7 (14.4, 29.3) 6 (1, 34) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.4, 7.4)
Raleigh County 2 Urban 21.5 (17.4, 26.2) 4 (1, 20) 22 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.7, 4.5)
Putnam County 2 Urban 17.7 (13.5, 22.8) 10 (2, 34) 13 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 6.3)
Summers County 2 Rural 18.5 (10.0, 32.3) 7 (1, 38) 3 stable stable trend 3.0 (-3.1, 10.1)
Lewis County 2 Rural 23.5 (15.3, 35.0) 2 (1, 34) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.5, 7.8)
Marion County 2 Rural 16.9 (12.9, 21.9) 14 (2, 35) 13 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.5, 7.3)
Randolph County 2 Rural 24.2 (17.0, 33.5) 1 (1, 28) 9 rising rising trend 5.9 (1.5, 23.7)
Wayne County 2 Urban 20.8 (15.6, 27.4) 5 (1, 29) 12 rising rising trend 5.9 (3.7, 8.8)
Hancock County 2 Urban 14.0 (9.0, 21.1) 29 (3, 38) 6 stable stable trend 7.6 (-2.7, 32.8)
Braxton County 2 Rural 15.1 (8.5, 26.1) 23 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Hampshire County 2 Urban 9.8 (5.2, 17.1) 38 (10, 38) 3
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 16.6 (11.0, 24.4) 16 (1, 38) 6
*
*
Marshall County 2 Urban 13.5 (8.8, 20.0) 31 (5, 38) 6
*
*
McDowell County 2 Rural 13.3 (7.6, 22.1) 32 (2, 38) 4
*
*
Morgan County 2 Urban 15.1 (8.3, 25.7) 24 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Roane County 2 Rural 18.3 (10.1, 30.9) 8 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Taylor County 2 Rural 17.0 (10.1, 27.5) 12 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Barbour County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ritchie County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wetzel County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 10:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top