Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Alabama 2 N/A 23.8 (23.1, 24.6) N/A 780 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 29.8 (29.7, 29.9) N/A 60,125 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Macon County 2 Urban 38.0 (23.3, 59.1) 1 (1, 36) 5
*
*
Shelby County 2 Urban 34.4 (30.1, 39.2) 2 (1, 9) 49 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.8)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 31.8 (29.4, 34.5) 3 (1, 10) 133 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Marion County 2 Rural 31.5 (20.3, 46.8) 4 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.6, 4.2)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 30.8 (24.7, 38.0) 5 (1, 24) 19 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.4)
Monroe County 2 Rural 30.7 (18.3, 48.9) 6 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban 27.4 (24.4, 30.7) 7 (3, 20) 66 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.3)
Geneva County 2 Urban 26.9 (16.8, 41.4) 8 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.8, 7.6)
Baldwin County 2 Urban 26.9 (23.3, 30.9) 9 (3, 25) 45 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.8)
Elmore County 2 Urban 25.7 (19.9, 32.6) 10 (2, 35) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 3.6)
Talladega County 2 Rural 24.4 (18.8, 31.3) 11 (2, 37) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.6)
Dallas County 2 Rural 24.1 (16.1, 34.9) 12 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.9, 2.2)
Autauga County 2 Urban 24.0 (17.6, 32.2) 13 (2, 39) 10 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.6, 0.9)
Franklin County 2 Rural 23.9 (14.8, 36.7) 14 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-18.1, 3.4)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 23.8 (20.3, 27.8) 15 (6, 32) 35 rising rising trend 11.2 (0.2, 20.9)
Chambers County 2 Rural 23.5 (15.4, 34.8) 16 (1, 41) 6
*
*
Morgan County 2 Urban 23.5 (18.8, 29.0) 17 (5, 36) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.3)
Lee County 2 Urban 23.3 (19.0, 28.2) 18 (6, 36) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 2.0)
Dale County 2 Rural 23.0 (15.3, 33.2) 19 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.6, 4.8)
Pike County 2 Rural 23.0 (14.2, 35.4) 20 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend -3.8 (-11.4, 0.0)
Mobile County 2 Urban 22.8 (20.2, 25.6) 21 (9, 31) 62 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Lauderdale County 2 Urban 22.8 (17.6, 29.1) 22 (4, 38) 15 stable stable trend -8.4 (-16.7, 0.2)
Tuscaloosa County 2 Urban 22.5 (18.8, 26.7) 23 (7, 36) 28 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.7)
Barbour County 2 Rural 21.6 (12.2, 36.0) 24 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Tallapoosa County 2 Rural 21.0 (14.0, 30.6) 25 (3, 42) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 2.3)
Chilton County 2 Urban 21.0 (13.7, 30.9) 26 (2, 42) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 3.8)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 20.6 (16.3, 25.6) 27 (7, 39) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.2)
Colbert County 2 Urban 20.3 (14.8, 27.6) 28 (6, 41) 9 stable stable trend -4.8 (-18.1, 0.2)
Cullman County 2 Rural 20.1 (15.4, 26.0) 29 (7, 40) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.0, 6.1)
Clarke County 2 Rural 19.4 (11.5, 31.7) 30 (2, 42) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.0, 5.6)
Jackson County 2 Rural 19.3 (13.0, 27.6) 31 (6, 42) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.3, 5.3)
Houston County 2 Urban 19.1 (14.6, 24.5) 32 (10, 41) 14 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.0, -2.4)
Walker County 2 Urban 19.0 (13.4, 26.4) 33 (7, 42) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.7)
Russell County 2 Urban 18.9 (13.1, 26.6) 34 (7, 42) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.7)
Limestone County 2 Urban 18.9 (14.3, 24.6) 35 (10, 41) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.1, -0.2)
Blount County 2 Urban 17.3 (12.0, 24.2) 36 (11, 42) 7
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Urban 17.1 (10.9, 26.3) 37 (7, 42) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.4)
Marshall County 2 Rural 16.6 (12.0, 22.4) 38 (15, 42) 9 falling falling trend -4.0 (-8.2, -0.4)
Escambia County 2 Rural 15.2 (8.7, 25.0) 39 (9, 42) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.9, 4.4)
Coffee County 2 Rural 15.2 (9.8, 22.7) 40 (14, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.2)
Etowah County 2 Urban 12.6 (9.1, 17.1) 41 (30, 42) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.6)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 10.3 (6.4, 15.9) 42 (33, 42) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 3.4)
Bibb County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 11:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top