Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 32.6 (32.0, 33.3) N/A 2,175 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.6, 1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 29.8 (29.7, 29.9) N/A 60,125 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Richmond County 2 Rural 13.2 (8.0, 21.0) 82 (62, 82) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.3, 4.3)
Dare County 2 Rural 14.3 (8.6, 23.1) 81 (52, 82) 5 falling falling trend -23.4 (-47.0, -3.3)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 17.4 (9.3, 30.3) 80 (20, 82) 4
*
*
Scotland County 2 Rural 18.3 (10.8, 29.2) 79 (24, 82) 4 stable stable trend -4.1 (-10.3, 0.6)
Lee County 2 Rural 18.5 (12.8, 26.0) 78 (38, 82) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.6, -0.3)
Alexander County 2 Urban 19.6 (12.8, 29.4) 77 (27, 82) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.8, 9.3)
Wilson County 2 Rural 20.4 (15.3, 26.8) 76 (34, 82) 12 stable stable trend 17.2 (-1.1, 35.3)
Wilkes County 2 Rural 20.4 (14.9, 27.6) 75 (31, 82) 10 falling falling trend -6.4 (-29.3, -2.9)
Moore County 2 Urban 20.5 (15.8, 26.2) 74 (38, 82) 16 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.6, 0.3)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 20.9 (16.1, 26.8) 73 (34, 82) 14 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.8)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 21.1 (13.8, 31.8) 72 (19, 82) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.6, 2.4)
Robeson County 2 Rural 22.3 (17.5, 28.1) 71 (33, 81) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 2.9)
Jackson County 2 Rural 23.3 (14.9, 34.9) 70 (6, 82) 6
*
*
Davidson County 2 Urban 23.4 (19.6, 27.8) 69 (34, 79) 29 stable stable trend -4.5 (-22.1, 0.9)
Anson County 2 Urban 23.6 (14.5, 37.6) 68 (6, 82) 4
*
*
Surry County 2 Rural 23.8 (17.8, 31.2) 67 (18, 81) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.4, 4.3)
Hoke County 2 Urban 23.9 (16.2, 33.9) 66 (10, 82) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.2, 5.7)
Person County 2 Urban 23.9 (16.6, 33.9) 65 (11, 82) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.1, 4.6)
Davie County 2 Urban 23.9 (16.6, 33.7) 64 (12, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.5)
Columbus County 2 Rural 24.1 (17.1, 33.3) 63 (11, 82) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.5, 4.6)
Stanly County 2 Rural 24.6 (17.7, 33.3) 62 (10, 81) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.8, 5.2)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 24.6 (18.2, 32.8) 61 (15, 81) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.4, 3.6)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 25.5 (18.2, 35.3) 60 (9, 81) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.4)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 25.7 (20.3, 32.2) 59 (17, 79) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 4.1)
Stokes County 2 Urban 25.9 (17.6, 37.0) 58 (6, 82) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.5, 3.9)
Pitt County 2 Urban 26.0 (21.5, 31.1) 57 (23, 77) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.9)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 26.0 (22.5, 30.0) 56 (29, 73) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.9)
Haywood County 2 Rural 26.0 (19.9, 33.9) 55 (11, 79) 14 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.4, 1.0)
Onslow County 2 Urban 26.3 (21.4, 31.9) 54 (19, 77) 21 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.5)
Johnston County 2 Urban 26.3 (22.4, 30.7) 53 (24, 74) 34 rising rising trend 14.7 (0.1, 26.4)
Sampson County 2 Rural 27.1 (20.0, 36.2) 52 (6, 80) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.4)
Ashe County 2 Rural 27.2 (17.7, 40.9) 51 (2, 82) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.9, 9.5)
Duplin County 2 Rural 27.3 (19.7, 37.0) 50 (5, 80) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 3.1)
Wayne County 2 Urban 27.3 (22.0, 33.5) 49 (13, 76) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Nash County 2 Urban 27.5 (21.9, 34.1) 48 (12, 77) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.5)
Craven County 2 Rural 27.5 (21.6, 34.6) 47 (11, 77) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.8)
Vance County 2 Rural 27.8 (19.3, 38.9) 46 (3, 81) 8 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.5, 6.6)
Pender County 2 Urban 28.1 (20.9, 37.0) 45 (5, 79) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.6)
Polk County 2 Rural 28.2 (15.9, 47.4) 44 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.6, 6.1)
Granville County 2 Rural 28.2 (21.4, 36.8) 43 (6, 79) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.6)
Martin County 2 Rural 28.3 (17.2, 44.7) 42 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.9, 4.4)
Yadkin County 2 Urban 28.9 (20.1, 40.6) 41 (2, 80) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.1, 5.5)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 29.7 (22.4, 38.7) 40 (4, 76) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 3.8)
Warren County 2 Rural 29.8 (17.3, 49.0) 39 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 5.9)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 29.9 (23.6, 37.4) 38 (5, 73) 17 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.3)
Franklin County 2 Urban 29.9 (22.9, 38.5) 37 (4, 76) 14 rising rising trend 6.4 (1.2, 22.0)
Carteret County 2 Rural 30.0 (23.0, 38.6) 36 (4, 77) 16 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 4.9)
Hertford County 2 Rural 30.1 (18.1, 47.8) 35 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.2, 1.8)
Iredell County 2 Urban 30.4 (26.0, 35.4) 34 (11, 64) 36 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.2)
Macon County 2 Rural 30.8 (21.3, 43.5) 33 (1, 79) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.6, 5.7)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 31.0 (25.9, 37.0) 32 (7, 66) 41 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.1, 5.4)
Halifax County 2 Rural 31.5 (23.2, 42.1) 31 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.2, 3.2)
Watauga County 2 Rural 31.8 (22.8, 43.5) 30 (1, 78) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.0, 5.6)
Rowan County 2 Urban 31.9 (26.6, 38.0) 29 (5, 65) 29 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 4.6)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 32.2 (23.0, 44.0) 28 (1, 78) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.4)
Bladen County 2 Rural 32.8 (22.9, 46.2) 27 (1, 79) 8
*
*
Northampton County 2 Rural 32.8 (20.0, 52.5) 26 (1, 82) 5
*
*
Forsyth County 2 Urban 33.2 (30.0, 36.8) 25 (8, 46) 83 stable stable trend -1.6 (-9.6, 0.3)
Catawba County 2 Urban 33.2 (28.4, 38.7) 24 (5, 56) 37 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.2)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 33.6 (29.8, 37.7) 23 (7, 48) 60 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.3)
Harnett County 2 Rural 33.8 (27.9, 40.6) 22 (2, 60) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.5)
Chatham County 2 Urban 34.4 (27.3, 42.9) 21 (1, 65) 20 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 2.7)
Randolph County 2 Urban 34.8 (29.6, 40.9) 20 (3, 54) 34 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.0, 6.9)
Burke County 2 Urban 35.2 (28.5, 43.0) 19 (1, 59) 22 stable stable trend -2.4 (-18.8, 1.3)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 35.2 (31.3, 39.5) 18 (5, 43) 66 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.9)
Gaston County 2 Urban 35.3 (31.1, 40.1) 17 (4, 43) 53 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.5, 4.1)
Alamance County 2 Urban 35.5 (30.5, 41.0) 16 (2, 48) 39 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.9)
Wake County 2 Urban 35.8 (33.7, 37.9) 15 (7, 31) 229 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.7, 8.7)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 36.0 (26.9, 47.4) 14 (1, 68) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.6, 6.5)
Caswell County 2 Rural 36.3 (22.9, 55.1) 13 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 3.9)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 36.4 (31.9, 41.4) 12 (3, 44) 48 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 4.2)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 36.8 (30.5, 44.3) 11 (1, 54) 26 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 5.6)
Bertie County 2 Rural 36.9 (22.1, 58.8) 10 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-5.2, 7.2)
Yancey County 2 Rural 36.9 (21.3, 59.8) 9 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Henderson County 2 Urban 38.8 (32.8, 45.8) 8 (1, 42) 36 rising rising trend 17.9 (0.1, 35.4)
McDowell County 2 Rural 38.9 (29.1, 51.2) 7 (1, 66) 12 stable stable trend 4.2 (-10.9, 18.7)
Orange County 2 Urban 39.0 (33.1, 45.7) 6 (1, 40) 33 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.2)
Durham County 2 Urban 39.0 (35.1, 43.3) 5 (1, 28) 75 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.7)
Madison County 2 Urban 39.4 (25.8, 58.4) 4 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.7, 9.4)
Guilford County 2 Urban 42.8 (39.7, 46.2) 3 (1, 14) 145 stable stable trend 1.5 (-5.1, 3.4)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 44.3 (41.9, 46.8) 2 (1, 9) 268 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.3, 3.6)
Union County 2 Urban 44.6 (39.7, 49.9) 1 (1, 16) 63 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 4.2)
Alleghany County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 2:42 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top