Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Minnesota 2 N/A 30.7 (29.8, 31.5) N/A 1,023 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.1, 4.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 29.8 (29.7, 29.9) N/A 60,125 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 26.6 (19.3, 35.8) 38 (8, 53) 11 falling falling trend -4.2 (-15.8, -0.1)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 21.6 (14.1, 31.8) 48 (12, 53) 6 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.9, -0.3)
Dakota County 2 Urban 32.9 (29.7, 36.4) 16 (9, 34) 83 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.8, -1.3)
Mower County 2 Rural 23.9 (15.6, 35.1) 44 (9, 53) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.4, 2.2)
Morrison County 2 Rural 15.2 (8.4, 25.6) 53 (32, 53) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.8, 2.8)
Isanti County 2 Urban 21.3 (13.4, 32.2) 49 (12, 53) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.4, 4.8)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 31.3 (29.4, 33.2) 25 (14, 34) 225 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.3, -0.4)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 29.4 (21.0, 40.3) 32 (5, 52) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.9, 2.9)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 28.6 (21.1, 37.9) 34 (7, 51) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 3.2)
Steele County 2 Rural 31.6 (21.7, 44.5) 23 (3, 51) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.5)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 26.6 (16.9, 40.3) 39 (5, 53) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.0, 5.5)
Wright County 2 Urban 26.4 (21.5, 32.2) 40 (14, 51) 21 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.6)
Houston County 2 Urban 29.9 (17.2, 49.1) 30 (2, 53) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.3, 5.6)
McLeod County 2 Rural 23.7 (15.3, 35.3) 45 (9, 53) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.4, 6.3)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 37.0 (25.5, 52.0) 9 (1, 49) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.5)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 30.6 (24.1, 38.4) 29 (6, 48) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 4.1)
Washington County 2 Urban 34.4 (30.5, 38.8) 12 (7, 33) 58 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.3)
Winona County 2 Rural 30.9 (21.5, 43.1) 28 (3, 52) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.5, 4.6)
Stearns County 2 Urban 30.9 (25.5, 37.2) 27 (8, 46) 25 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Carver County 2 Urban 27.2 (21.6, 33.8) 37 (11, 51) 17 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 4.0)
Scott County 2 Urban 28.8 (23.7, 34.6) 33 (10, 48) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.4, 5.6)
Becker County 2 Rural 29.8 (20.9, 41.6) 31 (5, 52) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 5.8)
Rice County 2 Rural 23.7 (16.9, 32.3) 46 (11, 53) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 4.7)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 23.4 (19.5, 27.9) 47 (26, 52) 30 stable stable trend 1.7 (-7.9, 15.1)
Clay County 2 Urban 33.9 (25.2, 44.5) 13 (3, 49) 11 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.8)
Itasca County 2 Rural 33.1 (24.0, 44.8) 15 (3, 50) 11 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 4.9)
Chisago County 2 Urban 32.4 (24.0, 42.9) 18 (4, 49) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.8)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 46.2 (39.9, 53.1) 5 (1, 13) 43 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.4, 3.8)
Benton County 2 Urban 32.3 (22.3, 45.2) 20 (3, 51) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.9, 7.2)
Cass County 2 Rural 32.2 (20.7, 48.1) 21 (2, 52) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.5, 6.2)
Dodge County 2 Urban 45.4 (28.8, 68.2) 6 (1, 49) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 5.7)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 32.3 (23.8, 42.9) 19 (4, 49) 12 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.7, 7.1)
Polk County 2 Urban 28.2 (18.0, 42.4) 35 (3, 53) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.4, 8.2)
Martin County 2 Rural 37.9 (23.3, 58.5) 8 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.3, 7.2)
Anoka County 2 Urban 27.5 (24.3, 30.9) 36 (18, 47) 59 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.7, 13.8)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 31.9 (20.9, 46.9) 22 (2, 52) 6 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.1, 7.8)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 49.4 (32.0, 72.7) 2 (1, 44) 6 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.2, 10.0)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 25.7 (16.8, 37.5) 42 (7, 53) 6 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.1, 9.1)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 32.5 (29.6, 35.6) 17 (9, 34) 101 stable stable trend 4.6 (-0.4, 10.5)
Douglas County 2 Rural 43.6 (31.6, 58.8) 7 (1, 39) 11 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.7, 8.7)
Brown County 2 Rural 36.8 (23.7, 54.6) 10 (1, 51) 6 stable stable trend 5.4 (-0.8, 13.2)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 20.3 (11.8, 36.7) 50 (11, 53) 4
*
*
Carlton County 2 Urban 20.0 (11.7, 31.9) 51 (12, 53) 4
*
*
Hubbard County 2 Rural 24.0 (13.8, 40.0) 43 (4, 53) 4
*
*
Lyon County 2 Rural 47.9 (32.6, 68.0) 3 (1, 42) 7
*
*
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 31.4 (19.7, 47.8) 24 (2, 53) 5
*
*
Nobles County 2 Rural 25.8 (14.3, 43.1) 41 (4, 53) 3
*
*
Pine County 2 Rural 19.2 (11.0, 31.9) 52 (13, 53) 4
*
*
Redwood County 2 Rural 34.5 (19.4, 57.4) 11 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Todd County 2 Rural 33.5 (20.9, 51.0) 14 (1, 53) 5
*
*
Wabasha County 2 Urban 31.0 (19.0, 48.4) 26 (2, 53) 5
*
*
Waseca County 2 Rural 46.5 (29.6, 69.7) 4 (1, 48) 5
*
*
Watonwan County 2 Rural 61.7 (36.9, 97.3) 1 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Big Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meeker County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 2:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top