Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 2 N/A 27.0 (26.4, 27.5) N/A 2,018 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 29.8 (29.7, 29.9) N/A 60,125 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Champaign County 2 Rural 22.9 (15.1, 33.6) 50 (5, 80) 6 falling falling trend -15.0 (-34.9, -0.8)
Auglaize County 2 Rural 29.2 (20.6, 40.2) 19 (2, 74) 9 falling falling trend -11.5 (-22.4, -4.9)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 39.3 (36.3, 42.6) 3 (1, 9) 139 falling falling trend -9.1 (-14.1, -3.4)
Mahoning County 2 Urban 11.7 (9.2, 14.6) 80 (71, 80) 19 falling falling trend -8.7 (-21.0, -4.8)
Trumbull County 2 Urban 17.4 (14.3, 21.2) 75 (45, 79) 25 falling falling trend -7.3 (-16.2, -4.3)
Huron County 2 Rural 17.5 (11.5, 25.4) 74 (24, 80) 6 falling falling trend -6.5 (-23.5, -1.9)
Ashtabula County 2 Urban 12.9 (9.1, 17.8) 79 (58, 80) 9 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.5, -0.9)
Clinton County 2 Rural 19.4 (12.3, 29.3) 66 (9, 80) 5 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.1, -1.1)
Williams County 2 Rural 21.6 (13.8, 32.4) 56 (6, 80) 5 stable stable trend -3.4 (-9.6, 1.6)
Logan County 2 Rural 16.1 (9.8, 24.9) 76 (25, 80) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.1, 0.4)
Morrow County 2 Urban 15.0 (8.3, 25.4) 78 (21, 80) 3 stable stable trend -2.9 (-8.3, 2.1)
Wayne County 2 Rural 21.4 (16.8, 26.9) 57 (19, 77) 16 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.8, 0.3)
Shelby County 2 Rural 27.8 (19.2, 38.8) 24 (2, 76) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.0, 0.6)
Mercer County 2 Rural 26.6 (17.7, 38.3) 28 (2, 79) 7 stable stable trend -2.4 (-8.4, 3.3)
Fulton County 2 Urban 20.5 (13.1, 30.8) 61 (7, 80) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.0, 1.3)
Delaware County 2 Urban 33.1 (28.7, 38.1) 8 (3, 35) 41 stable stable trend -2.1 (-11.7, 1.3)
Lorain County 2 Urban 24.2 (21.2, 27.6) 42 (19, 64) 51 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.0)
Van Wert County 2 Rural 22.9 (13.6, 36.4) 49 (3, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.0, 3.2)
Clermont County 2 Urban 25.3 (21.6, 29.6) 35 (12, 64) 36 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Highland County 2 Rural 18.7 (12.2, 27.8) 68 (14, 80) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.1, 3.9)
Columbiana County 2 Rural 15.8 (11.7, 21.0) 77 (44, 80) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.0)
Belmont County 2 Urban 34.7 (26.8, 44.4) 6 (1, 53) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.8, 2.7)
Carroll County 2 Urban 23.3 (14.2, 36.7) 47 (3, 80) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.6)
Fayette County 2 Rural 19.8 (11.4, 32.2) 63 (6, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 2.3)
Stark County 2 Urban 28.3 (25.2, 31.6) 23 (8, 47) 71 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Wyandot County 2 Rural 26.0 (14.6, 42.9) 31 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.6, 2.8)
Guernsey County 2 Rural 21.1 (13.8, 31.4) 58 (7, 80) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.6, 3.0)
Medina County 2 Urban 29.9 (25.5, 35.0) 17 (5, 48) 36 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Lucas County 2 Urban 25.4 (22.7, 28.4) 34 (17, 58) 69 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Warren County 2 Urban 29.3 (25.4, 33.6) 18 (5, 48) 44 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 29.0 (26.9, 31.3) 20 (9, 39) 147 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Coshocton County 2 Rural 20.2 (12.8, 30.6) 62 (8, 80) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.7, 5.4)
Geauga County 2 Urban 31.9 (25.6, 39.3) 10 (2, 57) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Tuscarawas County 2 Rural 23.7 (18.1, 30.6) 45 (8, 76) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 3.6)
Cuyahoga County 2 Urban 28.8 (27.1, 30.6) 21 (11, 37) 241 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Scioto County 2 Rural 20.6 (14.9, 27.7) 60 (13, 79) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.6, 4.2)
Wood County 2 Urban 25.8 (20.5, 32.0) 32 (7, 70) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.4)
Marion County 2 Rural 25.6 (18.7, 34.4) 33 (4, 76) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 3.0)
Pickaway County 2 Urban 18.9 (12.8, 27.1) 67 (16, 80) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.8, 4.9)
Franklin County 2 Urban 27.0 (25.3, 28.8) 26 (17, 45) 189 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Lake County 2 Urban 30.6 (26.6, 35.1) 14 (4, 44) 49 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.6)
Defiance County 2 Rural 21.7 (14.5, 31.6) 55 (7, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.8, 4.4)
Richland County 2 Urban 24.5 (19.7, 30.3) 39 (9, 70) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.1)
Seneca County 2 Rural 19.7 (13.1, 28.5) 64 (10, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.1, 3.8)
Fairfield County 2 Urban 22.4 (18.3, 27.2) 52 (20, 75) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.7)
Preble County 2 Rural 39.0 (28.5, 52.3) 4 (1, 51) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.1, 4.3)
Erie County 2 Urban 18.3 (13.3, 24.7) 69 (25, 80) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.6, 4.4)
Darke County 2 Rural 21.0 (14.4, 29.8) 59 (8, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.1)
Madison County 2 Urban 24.1 (16.4, 34.7) 43 (4, 79) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 4.3)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 24.9 (17.1, 35.5) 38 (4, 78) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.0, 5.1)
Sandusky County 2 Rural 22.6 (16.2, 30.9) 51 (7, 78) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 4.0)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 30.7 (23.5, 39.6) 13 (2, 62) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 4.6)
Ashland County 2 Rural 23.5 (16.4, 32.8) 46 (5, 79) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.9, 5.7)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 18.1 (12.5, 25.6) 70 (22, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.9)
Butler County 2 Urban 30.4 (27.1, 33.9) 16 (6, 40) 69 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.6)
Muskingum County 2 Rural 27.1 (21.1, 34.2) 25 (5, 69) 16 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.7)
Allen County 2 Urban 33.0 (26.7, 40.3) 9 (1, 48) 22 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.3)
Brown County 2 Urban 17.7 (11.6, 26.3) 72 (16, 80) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.6, 5.8)
Portage County 2 Urban 28.5 (23.7, 33.9) 22 (5, 58) 28 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.3)
Hancock County 2 Rural 24.2 (18.0, 31.9) 41 (6, 76) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.5)
Hardin County 2 Rural 25.2 (15.7, 38.6) 36 (2, 79) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.2, 6.5)
Summit County 2 Urban 30.4 (27.7, 33.3) 15 (6, 36) 108 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.6)
Putnam County 2 Rural 46.9 (34.0, 63.3) 1 (1, 35) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 5.1)
Miami County 2 Urban 31.6 (25.7, 38.6) 11 (2, 50) 22 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.3)
Ross County 2 Rural 33.4 (26.4, 41.8) 7 (1, 53) 17 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.8)
Athens County 2 Rural 19.5 (12.9, 28.4) 65 (11, 80) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 6.7)
Hocking County 2 Urban 22.0 (13.5, 34.4) 54 (4, 80) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.1, 6.9)
Washington County 2 Rural 31.1 (23.5, 40.6) 12 (1, 63) 13 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.4, 5.8)
Licking County 2 Urban 24.2 (20.3, 28.8) 40 (13, 68) 29 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.8, 6.2)
Greene County 2 Urban 43.1 (37.3, 49.7) 2 (1, 10) 44 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.5, 4.8)
Pike County 2 Rural 24.1 (15.0, 37.3) 44 (3, 80) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.9, 9.9)
Knox County 2 Rural 18.1 (12.2, 25.9) 71 (24, 80) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.9, 7.0)
Clark County 2 Urban 26.9 (22.1, 32.5) 27 (6, 62) 25 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.5, 9.3)
Union County 2 Urban 26.4 (19.4, 35.4) 30 (4, 76) 9 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.8, 9.9)
Gallia County 2 Rural 17.6 (10.3, 28.7) 73 (11, 80) 4 rising rising trend 10.9 (1.6, 33.4)
Crawford County 2 Rural 23.0 (16.0, 32.3) 48 (6, 79) 8
*
*
Harrison County 2 Rural 37.2 (20.7, 62.3) 5 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 22.1 (13.5, 34.3) 53 (4, 80) 4
*
*
Paulding County 2 Rural 26.6 (15.0, 44.1) 29 (1, 80) 3
*
*
Perry County 2 Urban 25.0 (16.5, 36.7) 37 (3, 80) 6
*
*
Adams County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 11:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top