Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 54.0 (53.7, 54.3) N/A 23,578 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Maine 2 31.3 (18.5, 48.8) 45 (21, 46) 4
*
*
Idaho 7 59.0 (34.9, 91.7) 18 (1, 46) 5
*
*
New Hampshire 2 38.3 (23.5, 58.1) 43 (7, 46) 5
*
*
Hawaii 7 28.7 (19.0, 41.2) 46 (33, 46) 6
*
*
Utah 7 40.4 (26.5, 58.0) 41 (8, 46) 7
*
*
Alaska 2 41.0 (28.7, 56.4) 39 (13, 46) 9
*
*
New Mexico 7 33.7 (26.6, 42.2) 44 (34, 46) 17 falling falling trend -19.5 (-33.3, -1.9)
Rhode Island 2 49.2 (41.4, 57.9) 29 (15, 43) 32 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Oregon 2 44.3 (37.4, 51.9) 35 (22, 44) 34 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.5)
Nebraska 2 61.9 (53.9, 70.7) 14 (4, 28) 48 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
West Virginia 2 64.2 (56.1, 73.2) 9 (2, 25) 49 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Iowa 7 78.5 (68.7, 89.1) 2 (1, 11) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Colorado 2 39.3 (35.4, 43.6) 42 (33, 45) 82 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Kansas 2 59.3 (53.9, 65.0) 19 (6, 26) 98 falling falling trend -4.2 (-11.0, -2.1)
Delaware 2 47.1 (43.2, 51.3) 32 (24, 40) 114 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.1, -2.0)
Arizona 2 41.8 (38.4, 45.4) 37 (31, 44) 123 falling falling trend -11.7 (-16.2, -6.0)
Nevada 2 45.4 (41.8, 49.2) 34 (27, 42) 128 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.5)
Washington 1 53.5 (49.2, 58.1) 23 (17, 32) 135 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Minnesota 2 58.3 (53.6, 63.3) 21 (8, 27) 136 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
Oklahoma 2 63.8 (59.5, 68.3) 12 (5, 21) 181 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Connecticut 7 52.4 (49.0, 55.8) 25 (20, 32) 198 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Massachusetts 2 41.6 (39.0, 44.3) 38 (33, 44) 209 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
District of Columbia 2 60.0 (56.5, 63.8) 17 (8, 22) 225 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Wisconsin 2 83.6 (78.7, 88.7) 1 (1, 3) 248 falling falling trend -4.8 (-9.3, -0.7)
Kentucky 7 76.4 (72.2, 80.7) 3 (1, 5) 280 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -2.4)
Arkansas 2 69.6 (66.1, 73.2) 5 (3, 11) 331 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Indiana 2 62.9 (60.0, 65.9) 13 (6, 20) 382 falling falling trend -6.8 (-9.6, -3.9)
Missouri 2 73.2 (70.4, 76.2) 4 (2, 6) 539 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
New Jersey 7 46.1 (44.4, 47.8) 33 (29, 38) 609 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.8, -2.5)
Tennessee 2 58.8 (56.7, 60.9) 20 (14, 22) 671 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.6)
Alabama 2 51.5 (49.8, 53.3) 26 (22, 30) 754 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Mississippi 2 66.4 (64.2, 68.6) 6 (5, 14) 762 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -1.0)
South Carolina 2 51.1 (49.5, 52.8) 27 (22, 31) 800 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.3, -3.2)
Michigan 2 61.9 (60.0, 63.7) 15 (10, 20) 950 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -2.6)
Pennsylvania 2 64.1 (62.2, 66.0) 10 (6, 17) 955 falling falling trend -5.8 (-8.9, -2.5)
Maryland 2 47.6 (46.2, 49.0) 30 (27, 36) 990 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
Virginia 2 53.2 (51.7, 54.8) 24 (20, 28) 994 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.4, -1.2)
Louisiana 7 63.9 (62.0, 65.7) 11 (7, 17) 997 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -1.4)
Ohio 2 66.3 (64.5, 68.2) 7 (5, 13) 1,061 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.0)
California 7 47.5 (46.3, 48.8) 31 (28, 36) 1,250 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -2.6)
Illinois 7 66.0 (64.4, 67.6) 8 (5, 13) 1,330 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.5)
Florida 2 40.9 (39.9, 41.9) 40 (36, 43) 1,420 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.0, -2.3)
New York 7 42.8 (41.8, 43.8) 36 (33, 41) 1,499 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -2.1)
North Carolina 2 61.1 (59.6, 62.5) 16 (12, 20) 1,512 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -1.1)
Georgia 7 49.6 (48.4, 50.7) 28 (25, 32) 1,621 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.7, -1.8)
Texas 7 54.2 (52.9, 55.4) 22 (19, 26) 1,712 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -2.0)
Montana 2
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
North Dakota 2
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
South Dakota 2
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermont 2
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyoming 2
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Puerto Rico 2
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
¶¶¶

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 5:08 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

¶¶¶ Data for Puerto Rico is only available for All Races (includes Hispanics). For more information see data not available.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top