Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Cervix (All Stages^), 2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 7.4 (7.2, 7.5) N/A 12,960 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.6)
Tennessee 2 6.7 (5.9, 7.6) 31 (13, 44) 257 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.7, -1.2)
District of Columbia 2 6.6 (4.3, 9.9) 34 (1, 51) 25 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.0)
Indiana 2 7.9 (7.0, 9.0) 15 (3, 34) 270 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.9, -0.1)
New Jersey 7 6.8 (6.1, 7.6) 28 (13, 42) 354 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Connecticut 7 6.1 (5.0, 7.3) 39 (15, 50) 120 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Puerto Rico 2 11.1 (9.5, 12.8) N/A 196 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.4, -0.4)
Maine 2 6.3 (4.5, 8.5) 35 (4, 51) 47 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Illinois 7 7.2 (6.6, 7.9) 21 (11, 38) 497 stable stable trend -1.4 (-1.8, 0.3)
New York 7 6.9 (6.4, 7.4) 26 (15, 39) 760 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Rhode Island 2 4.7 (3.1, 6.9) 48 (16, 51) 28 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.2)
Hawaii 7 7.0 (5.1, 9.2) 24 (2, 50) 55 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Massachusetts 2 4.7 (4.0, 5.5) 49 (38, 51) 185 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
North Dakota 2 4.2 (2.4, 6.8) 50 (16, 51) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.3)
Michigan 2 6.7 (6.0, 7.5) 33 (14, 43) 351 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
South Carolina 2 7.0 (6.0, 8.1) 23 (9, 44) 189 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Colorado 2 5.4 (4.6, 6.3) 44 (27, 50) 166 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Delaware 2 5.9 (4.0, 8.3) 41 (4, 51) 37 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Arizona 2 7.0 (6.1, 7.9) 25 (10, 42) 254 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Maryland 2 5.4 (4.7, 6.3) 45 (27, 50) 194 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 3.5)
Pennsylvania 2 6.8 (6.2, 7.5) 27 (14, 41) 469 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
South Dakota 2 3.8 (2.3, 6.1) 51 (25, 51) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.2)
Alaska 2 5.9 (3.6, 9.2) 40 (1, 51) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
North Carolina 2 7.2 (6.5, 8.0) 20 (10, 38) 405 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Virginia 2 6.7 (6.0, 7.5) 30 (13, 43) 309 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Louisiana 7 8.2 (7.1, 9.5) 11 (1, 34) 201 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Nebraska 2 5.4 (4.0, 7.1) 46 (15, 51) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Oregon 2 5.5 (4.5, 6.6) 43 (23, 50) 127 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Washington 1 6.7 (5.9, 7.6) 29 (13, 43) 268 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Wyoming 2 7.5 (4.6, 11.5) 17 (1, 51) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.2)
California 7 7.2 (6.9, 7.6) 19 (14, 33) 1,483 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 1.8)
Florida 2 9.1 (8.6, 9.7) 4 (1, 13) 1,123 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Georgia 7 7.9 (7.2, 8.7) 14 (5, 28) 459 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 2.8)
Nevada 2 8.5 (7.1, 10.1) 9 (1, 35) 142 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
West Virginia 2 10.5 (8.4, 12.9) 1 (1, 23) 98 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Ohio 2 8.1 (7.4, 8.9) 12 (4, 27) 498 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3)
Wisconsin 2 7.1 (6.2, 8.2) 22 (8, 41) 221 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Arkansas 2 9.8 (8.2, 11.5) 2 (1, 20) 151 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Idaho 7 6.2 (4.6, 8.0) 38 (7, 51) 58 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Mississippi 2 9.0 (7.6, 10.7) 6 (1, 29) 145 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 0.9)
Texas 7 8.9 (8.4, 9.4) 7 (2, 14) 1,335 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.8)
Missouri 2 8.0 (7.0, 9.1) 13 (3, 34) 254 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Oklahoma 2 8.8 (7.5, 10.2) 8 (1, 30) 173 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Montana 2 7.3 (5.1, 10.1) 18 (1, 50) 39 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 2.0)
Iowa 7 6.2 (5.0, 7.7) 36 (12, 49) 99 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 5.7)
Alabama 2 9.1 (8.0, 10.4) 5 (1, 21) 249 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 5.0)
Kansas 2 8.3 (6.8, 10.0) 10 (1, 38) 122 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2)
Kentucky 7 9.3 (8.0, 10.7) 3 (1, 21) 207 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.9)
New Mexico 7 7.8 (6.1, 9.8) 16 (1, 45) 77 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 8.3)
Minnesota 2 6.2 (5.3, 7.2) 37 (15, 48) 177 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 6.0)
Utah 7 5.7 (4.5, 7.0) 42 (17, 51) 86 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.0, 9.5)
New Hampshire 2 5.0 (3.5, 7.0) 47 (15, 51) 39 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.6, 11.8)
Vermont 2 6.7 (4.0, 10.4) 32 (1, 51) 21
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 10:50 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top