Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Mexico 7 17.6 (16.6, 18.7) 51 (50, 51) 239 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Puerto Rico 2 20.3 (19.5, 21.2) N/A 479 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.5, 3.2)
Nevada 2 20.5 (19.6, 21.5) 50 (47, 50) 387 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Wyoming 2 20.8 (18.6, 23.2) 49 (42, 51) 72 rising rising trend 7.9 (0.2, 15.7)
Oklahoma 2 21.7 (20.8, 22.6) 48 (46, 50) 512 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Vermont 2 21.8 (19.8, 24.0) 47 (39, 50) 98 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.7, -3.9)
Texas 7 23.2 (22.9, 23.6) 46 (42, 47) 3,689 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Tennessee 2 23.2 (22.6, 23.9) 45 (41, 48) 1,019 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.9)
West Virginia 2 23.8 (22.5, 25.1) 44 (37, 48) 287 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 5.0)
Montana 2 23.8 (22.1, 25.6) 43 (35, 48) 169 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Alabama 2 23.8 (23.1, 24.6) 42 (38, 47) 780 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Arizona 2 24.3 (23.6, 25.0) 41 (38, 45) 1,082 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.3, -0.2)
Kansas 2 24.7 (23.6, 25.8) 40 (35, 46) 427 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 0.5)
Utah 7 25.1 (23.9, 26.2) 39 (32, 45) 379 rising rising trend 6.3 (1.4, 8.8)
North Dakota 2 25.7 (23.4, 28.1) 38 (21, 47) 105 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.9, 0.5)
Mississippi 2 26.1 (25.0, 27.2) 37 (27, 41) 488 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.7, 2.5)
Alaska 2 26.4 (24.1, 29.0) 36 (20, 46) 99 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.6)
Louisiana 7 26.5 (25.6, 27.4) 35 (27, 39) 757 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.7, 1.7)
Idaho 7 26.8 (25.3, 28.2) 34 (22, 41) 288 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Oregon 2 26.9 (25.9, 27.8) 33 (24, 38) 711 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.4, 9.4)
Ohio 2 27.0 (26.4, 27.5) 32 (26, 38) 2,018 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
California 7 27.1 (26.8, 27.4) 31 (27, 36) 6,162 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.1)
Arkansas 2 27.1 (26.0, 28.3) 30 (22, 38) 502 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.6, 1.6)
Indiana 2 27.3 (26.6, 28.1) 29 (23, 37) 1,129 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Kentucky 7 27.5 (26.6, 28.4) 28 (21, 37) 785 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.7, 1.3)
Maine 2 27.9 (26.3, 29.6) 27 (19, 38) 274 stable stable trend 4.3 (-1.8, 8.8)
Missouri 2 27.9 (27.2, 28.7) 26 (21, 34) 1,086 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.2)
Colorado 2 28.3 (27.5, 29.2) 25 (20, 32) 928 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.1, 4.2)
Florida 2 28.3 (27.9, 28.7) 24 (21, 29) 4,267 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
South Dakota 2 28.7 (26.5, 31.0) 23 (12, 38) 149 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.6, -0.4)
Georgia 7 28.7 (28.1, 29.3) 22 (20, 28) 1,846 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.7)
Nebraska 2 28.9 (27.4, 30.4) 21 (17, 35) 321 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Iowa 7 30.0 (28.9, 31.2) 20 (14, 26) 566 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.1)
South Carolina 2 30.3 (29.5, 31.2) 19 (15, 22) 1,043 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 1.5)
Minnesota 2 30.7 (29.8, 31.5) 18 (14, 21) 1,023 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.1, 4.2)
Pennsylvania 2 31.6 (31.0, 32.1) 17 (11, 19) 2,625 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 0.1)
Washington 1 31.6 (30.9, 32.4) 16 (10, 19) 1,444 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.3)
Maryland 2 31.7 (30.9, 32.5) 15 (10, 19) 1,233 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.6, 7.6)
Michigan 2 31.7 (31.1, 32.4) 14 (11, 19) 2,021 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Virginia 2 32.2 (31.5, 32.9) 13 (9, 18) 1,689 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.7, 6.6)
North Carolina 2 32.6 (32.0, 33.3) 12 (9, 15) 2,175 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.6, 1.9)
New Hampshire 2 32.6 (30.9, 34.5) 11 (7, 20) 298 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Illinois 7 32.7 (32.1, 33.3) 10 (8, 15) 2,503 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.5, 4.5)
Wisconsin 2 33.6 (32.7, 34.5) 9 (7, 13) 1,215 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.2)
Delaware 2 35.3 (33.2, 37.5) 8 (4, 13) 237 rising rising trend 9.3 (3.2, 18.1)
Hawaii 7 35.3 (33.5, 37.2) 7 (4, 12) 321 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Massachusetts 2 36.4 (35.6, 37.2) 6 (4, 8) 1,586 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.9, 5.2)
District of Columbia 2 37.1 (34.3, 40.2) 5 (3, 10) 129 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.7, 0.0)
Rhode Island 2 38.7 (36.6, 40.9) 4 (3, 7) 274 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.7)
New Jersey 7 41.5 (40.7, 42.2) 3 (2, 4) 2,363 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.7, 4.0)
Connecticut 7 42.8 (41.6, 44.1) 2 (1, 3) 968 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
New York 7 43.8 (43.3, 44.4) 1 (1, 2) 5,358 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.0, 4.6)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 4:49 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top