Incidence Rates Table
Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County
All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65
Sorted by CI*Rank
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montmorency County 2 | Rural | 280.5 (229.0, 341.4) | 1 (1, 70) | 31 |
stable
|
0.5 (-1.3, 2.2) |
| Alcona County 2 | Rural | 262.4 (213.4, 320.8) | 2 (1, 73) | 31 |
stable
|
0.1 (-2.6, 2.4) |
| Gladwin County 2 | Rural | 259.5 (231.1, 290.8) | 3 (1, 56) | 78 |
stable
|
0.5 (-1.1, 2.1) |
| Kalkaska County 2 | Urban | 257.8 (225.1, 294.3) | 4 (1, 65) | 54 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.0, 1.3) |
| Arenac County 2 | Rural | 255.7 (219.7, 296.5) | 5 (1, 69) | 47 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.7, 1.8) |
| Jackson County 2 | Urban | 255.6 (244.5, 267.2) | 6 (1, 26) | 444 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.7, 0.8) |
| Emmet County 2 | Rural | 252.3 (227.7, 279.1) | 7 (1, 56) | 92 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.2, 1.2) |
| Midland County 2 | Urban | 252.2 (236.8, 268.3) | 8 (1, 38) | 227 |
rising
|
2.3 (0.9, 5.6) |
| Bay County 2 | Urban | 249.9 (236.3, 264.1) | 9 (1, 39) | 293 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.2, 1.1) |
| Presque Isle County 2 | Rural | 249.8 (208.7, 297.5) | 10 (1, 73) | 36 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.4, 1.4) |
| Alpena County 2 | Rural | 248.9 (222.8, 277.4) | 11 (1, 63) | 82 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.3, 1.4) |
| Lake County 2 | Rural | 246.6 (207.5, 291.8) | 12 (1, 74) | 36 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.2, 0.9) |
| Crawford County 2 | Rural | 245.3 (208.1, 288.0) | 13 (1, 73) | 41 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.9, 1.4) |
| Sanilac County 2 | Rural | 244.7 (222.9, 268.2) | 14 (1, 61) | 113 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.2, 1.8) |
| Ogemaw County 2 | Rural | 243.3 (212.5, 277.7) | 15 (1, 72) | 61 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.9, 2.6) |
| Macomb County 2 | Urban | 241.9 (237.3, 246.6) | 16 (9, 32) | 2,340 |
falling
|
-0.5 (-0.8, -0.2) |
| Mackinac County 2 | Rural | 241.0 (198.9, 290.5) | 17 (1, 77) | 28 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.4, 3.1) |
| St. Clair County 2 | Urban | 240.6 (230.0, 251.7) | 18 (5, 43) | 447 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.1, 0.2) |
| Newaygo County 2 | Rural | 240.1 (220.6, 260.9) | 19 (2, 61) | 133 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.4, 1.0) |
| Wayne County 2 | Urban | 239.2 (235.9, 242.5) | 20 (12, 34) | 4,424 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.1, -0.8) |
| Benzie County 2 | Urban | 239.1 (206.8, 275.5) | 21 (1, 73) | 50 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.9, 1.3) |
| Eaton County 2 | Urban | 238.7 (225.7, 252.4) | 22 (5, 53) | 281 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.9, 0.9) |
| Wexford County 2 | Rural | 238.7 (215.3, 264.2) | 23 (1, 67) | 88 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.6, 0.5) |
| Shiawassee County 2 | Rural | 237.3 (220.9, 254.7) | 24 (3, 61) | 180 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.1, 0.8) |
| Roscommon County 2 | Rural | 235.9 (207.0, 268.4) | 25 (1, 72) | 72 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.5, 0.8) |
| Calhoun County 2 | Urban | 235.7 (223.9, 248.0) | 26 (7, 54) | 334 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.5, 0.7) |
| Saginaw County 2 | Urban | 235.3 (225.3, 245.7) | 27 (8, 51) | 470 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.2, 0.2) |
| Hillsdale County 2 | Rural | 235.1 (215.3, 256.4) | 28 (3, 66) | 121 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.6, 1.4) |
| Delta County 2 | Rural | 234.8 (212.2, 259.3) | 29 (2, 69) | 96 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.5, 2.1) |
| Mecosta County 2 | Rural | 234.6 (212.1, 258.9) | 30 (2, 69) | 95 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.2, 0.9) |
| Isabella County 2 | Rural | 234.5 (215.7, 254.5) | 31 (3, 65) | 127 |
rising
|
5.9 (0.1, 10.2) |
| Mason County 2 | Rural | 234.4 (209.1, 262.1) | 32 (1, 70) | 76 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.2, 2.4) |
| Ingham County 2 | Urban | 233.0 (224.4, 241.9) | 33 (11, 51) | 592 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.8, 0.8) |
| Clare County 2 | Rural | 232.8 (208.8, 259.1) | 34 (2, 70) | 87 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.6, 1.6) |
| Huron County 2 | Rural | 232.0 (207.5, 258.8) | 35 (2, 71) | 83 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.3, 1.2) |
| Antrim County 2 | Rural | 230.2 (202.1, 261.6) | 36 (2, 74) | 63 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.2, 1.3) |
| Osceola County 2 | Rural | 229.6 (202.0, 260.0) | 37 (2, 74) | 60 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.4, 0.9) |
| Manistee County 2 | Rural | 228.0 (200.8, 258.1) | 38 (2, 74) | 64 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.1, 0.4) |
| Oakland County 2 | Urban | 226.8 (223.1, 230.5) | 39 (27, 51) | 3,167 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.0, -0.5) |
| Gratiot County 2 | Rural | 226.6 (206.2, 248.7) | 40 (4, 71) | 97 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.9, 1.3) |
| Otsego County 2 | Rural | 226.0 (199.6, 255.2) | 41 (2, 74) | 63 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.9, 1.5) |
| Cheboygan County 2 | Rural | 226.0 (199.6, 255.3) | 42 (2, 74) | 69 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.8, 1.1) |
| Chippewa County 2 | Rural | 225.9 (204.3, 249.3) | 43 (3, 72) | 89 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.8, 1.6) |
| Iosco County 2 | Rural | 225.7 (198.3, 256.2) | 44 (2, 75) | 66 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.1, 1.7) |
| Grand Traverse County 2 | Urban | 222.5 (208.9, 236.9) | 45 (16, 68) | 228 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.6, -0.2) |
| St. Joseph County 2 | Rural | 221.0 (204.0, 239.2) | 46 (10, 72) | 140 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.8, 1.2) |
| Berrien County 2 | Urban | 221.0 (210.2, 232.1) | 47 (22, 66) | 363 |
falling
|
-0.5 (-1.1, -0.1) |
| Montcalm County 2 | Urban | 220.4 (204.9, 236.8) | 48 (12, 71) | 164 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.2, 0.7) |
| Clinton County 2 | Urban | 219.7 (205.1, 235.1) | 49 (16, 70) | 187 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.2, 0.5) |
| Barry County 2 | Urban | 219.1 (202.8, 236.6) | 50 (14, 71) | 155 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.2, 1.0) |
| Lapeer County 2 | Urban | 219.0 (205.5, 233.3) | 51 (18, 71) | 233 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.2, 0.1) |
| Kalamazoo County 2 | Urban | 218.7 (210.1, 227.6) | 52 (30, 66) | 522 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
| Tuscola County 2 | Rural | 218.7 (201.0, 237.6) | 53 (11, 73) | 135 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.8, 4.4) |
| Van Buren County 2 | Rural | 218.6 (203.5, 234.4) | 54 (17, 72) | 182 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.0, 0.2) |
| Livingston County 2 | Urban | 217.8 (208.6, 227.3) | 55 (30, 67) | 494 |
stable
|
1.9 (-1.8, 6.2) |
| Branch County 2 | Rural | 217.2 (197.9, 238.1) | 56 (10, 74) | 105 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.4, 1.4) |
| Missaukee County 2 | Rural | 216.1 (183.5, 253.4) | 57 (2, 79) | 38 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.3, 0.0) |
| Menominee County 2 | Rural | 215.1 (187.8, 245.5) | 58 (4, 77) | 56 |
stable
|
1.4 (-1.1, 4.1) |
| Leelanau County 2 | Urban | 214.6 (185.5, 247.5) | 59 (3, 78) | 53 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.4) |
| Washtenaw County 2 | Urban | 214.6 (207.4, 221.9) | 60 (37, 67) | 729 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
| Ionia County 2 | Urban | 214.0 (198.7, 230.1) | 61 (21, 73) | 156 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.8, 0.8) |
| Kent County 2 | Urban | 210.8 (205.6, 216.1) | 62 (47, 68) | 1,347 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.3) |
| Genesee County 2 | Urban | 210.3 (203.9, 216.9) | 63 (45, 69) | 911 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.4) |
| Oscoda County 2 | Rural | 207.5 (161.7, 263.3) | 64 (1, 82) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.7, 2.1) |
| Lenawee County 2 | Rural | 204.7 (192.1, 217.9) | 65 (40, 75) | 223 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.1, 0.6) |
| Charlevoix County 2 | Rural | 204.4 (179.4, 232.1) | 66 (12, 79) | 62 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-7.6, -0.3) |
| Cass County 2 | Urban | 201.7 (184.3, 220.3) | 67 (30, 77) | 118 |
falling
|
-8.2 (-14.3, -1.0) |
| Allegan County 2 | Rural | 200.4 (188.9, 212.4) | 68 (47, 75) | 257 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.4, 0.6) |
| Ottawa County 2 | Urban | 199.5 (191.9, 207.4) | 69 (56, 75) | 558 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-0.9, 0.0) |
| Monroe County 2 | Urban | 197.5 (187.5, 207.8) | 70 (54, 76) | 339 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.5, 0.8) |
| Alger County 2 | Rural | 196.0 (155.8, 244.8) | 71 (3, 82) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-3.7, 1.6) |
| Marquette County 2 | Rural | 193.6 (177.9, 210.3) | 72 (47, 78) | 130 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.2, 0.3) |
| Iron County 2 | Rural | 185.6 (148.9, 229.5) | 73 (11, 82) | 24 |
stable
|
-2.2 (-5.0, 0.2) |
| Oceana County 2 | Rural | 179.7 (157.0, 205.0) | 74 (48, 81) | 55 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.0, 1.3) |
| Luce County 2 | Rural | 176.8 (134.1, 230.6) | 75 (6, 82) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-3.4, 2.5) |
| Muskegon County 2 | Urban | 176.7 (167.8, 186.0) | 76 (70, 80) | 330 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.5, -0.9) |
| Dickinson County 2 | Rural | 171.5 (148.9, 197.0) | 77 (58, 82) | 49 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.6, 1.0) |
| Gogebic County 2 | Rural | 167.7 (138.4, 202.2) | 78 (47, 82) | 30 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.6, 2.7) |
| Schoolcraft County 2 | Rural | 160.4 (123.9, 206.2) | 79 (40, 82) | 17 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.8, -0.4) |
| Ontonagon County 2 | Rural | 148.6 (104.9, 209.3) | 80 (27, 82) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-4.2, 1.7) |
| Houghton County 2 | Rural | 144.9 (126.0, 165.9) | 81 (74, 82) | 48 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-2.9, 0.1) |
| Baraga County 2 | Rural | 139.6 (105.8, 182.0) | 82 (63, 82) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-3.0, 1.9) |
| Keweenaw County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 7:50 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.


