Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Langlade County 2 Rural 269.0 (235.6, 306.0) 1 (1, 48) 60 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.7)
Waushara County 2 Rural 263.5 (235.0, 295.0) 2 (1, 47) 78 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 258.3 (222.6, 298.2) 3 (1, 57) 45 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 3.6)
Marquette County 2 Rural 255.8 (219.5, 296.9) 4 (1, 61) 47 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.1)
Green Lake County 2 Rural 252.8 (221.2, 288.0) 5 (1, 58) 57 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.4)
Adams County 2 Rural 252.7 (221.5, 287.7) 6 (1, 60) 66 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.2, 4.5)
Marinette County 2 Rural 252.5 (230.4, 276.4) 7 (1, 48) 122 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.3)
Crawford County 2 Rural 249.0 (213.8, 288.7) 8 (1, 65) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.8)
Forest County 2 Rural 247.2 (202.0, 300.4) 9 (1, 70) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Ozaukee County 2 Urban 244.8 (230.1, 260.2) 10 (2, 45) 240 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Milwaukee County 2 Urban 243.6 (238.9, 248.3) 11 (5, 24) 2,199 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Walworth County 2 Rural 242.3 (228.7, 256.6) 12 (2, 44) 275 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
Fond du Lac County 2 Urban 242.0 (228.5, 256.2) 13 (2, 45) 269 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
Rock County 2 Urban 241.3 (230.6, 252.4) 14 (3, 38) 424 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Brown County 2 Urban 238.1 (229.7, 246.7) 15 (5, 40) 656 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
Waukesha County 2 Urban 237.6 (230.9, 244.5) 16 (7, 36) 1,082 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 2.7)
Iron County 2 Rural 236.8 (182.3, 305.1) 17 (1, 72) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.7)
Manitowoc County 2 Rural 236.6 (221.6, 252.5) 18 (3, 52) 221 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
Racine County 2 Urban 236.6 (226.9, 246.6) 19 (6, 43) 511 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Columbia County 2 Urban 236.5 (219.1, 254.9) 20 (3, 55) 157 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Juneau County 2 Rural 235.0 (210.1, 262.5) 21 (1, 63) 75 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Kenosha County 2 Urban 234.9 (224.7, 245.4) 22 (6, 47) 439 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Kewaunee County 2 Urban 234.7 (205.5, 267.2) 23 (1, 66) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Barron County 2 Rural 233.3 (213.4, 254.7) 24 (3, 60) 120 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.7)
Oconto County 2 Urban 233.0 (211.8, 255.9) 25 (2, 61) 110 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Shawano County 2 Rural 231.0 (210.0, 253.8) 26 (2, 62) 106 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Washington County 2 Urban 231.0 (219.8, 242.7) 27 (7, 52) 365 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Wood County 2 Rural 230.4 (214.8, 246.9) 28 (5, 57) 191 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Trempealeau County 2 Rural 230.3 (206.1, 256.6) 29 (2, 65) 74 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.9)
Florence County 2 Rural 229.4 (166.6, 311.3) 30 (1, 72) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.4)
Winnebago County 2 Urban 228.4 (218.0, 239.1) 31 (11, 54) 402 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Douglas County 2 Urban 228.1 (208.4, 249.3) 32 (4, 64) 114 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.3)
Outagamie County 2 Urban 226.9 (217.3, 236.8) 33 (13, 54) 459 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Monroe County 2 Rural 226.6 (206.9, 247.6) 34 (4, 63) 110 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 226.1 (211.8, 241.2) 35 (7, 60) 209 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Marathon County 2 Urban 225.1 (213.8, 236.8) 36 (12, 58) 335 falling falling trend -6.7 (-8.9, -5.2)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 224.8 (200.2, 252.0) 37 (2, 67) 77 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.4, 12.6)
Door County 2 Rural 223.5 (198.4, 251.2) 38 (3, 68) 78 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.3)
Clark County 2 Rural 223.0 (199.8, 248.3) 39 (3, 67) 77 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.5, -0.3)
Menominee County 2 Rural 222.8 (156.7, 307.3) 40 (1, 72) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.4)
Grant County 2 Rural 222.3 (202.9, 243.2) 41 (6, 65) 111 falling falling trend -0.8 (-2.2, -0.1)
Vernon County 2 Urban 222.0 (198.7, 247.6) 42 (3, 68) 79 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Sheboygan County 2 Urban 221.6 (209.5, 234.2) 43 (15, 61) 287 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Waupaca County 2 Rural 221.5 (203.9, 240.4) 44 (8, 64) 138 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.7, -0.1)
Bayfield County 2 Rural 221.4 (188.0, 259.6) 45 (1, 71) 43 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.8, 4.4)
Dane County 2 Urban 221.1 (215.3, 227.0) 46 (27, 55) 1,160 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
La Crosse County 2 Urban 219.2 (206.7, 232.3) 47 (17, 62) 256 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Sauk County 2 Rural 219.0 (203.0, 236.1) 48 (9, 64) 155 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Calumet County 2 Urban 217.8 (200.4, 236.5) 49 (9, 66) 127 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.3)
Price County 2 Rural 217.6 (183.5, 257.1) 50 (1, 71) 39 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.2)
Portage County 2 Rural 216.4 (200.2, 233.6) 51 (12, 66) 149 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Ashland County 2 Rural 215.6 (183.6, 252.0) 52 (2, 71) 39 stable stable trend -0.8 (-9.5, 0.8)
Vilas County 2 Rural 215.0 (186.8, 246.8) 53 (4, 71) 63 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.3)
Jackson County 2 Rural 214.2 (187.3, 244.2) 54 (4, 71) 52 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Green County 2 Urban 211.2 (190.7, 233.5) 55 (10, 70) 89 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Rusk County 2 Rural 210.2 (177.5, 248.0) 56 (3, 72) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Dodge County 2 Rural 208.6 (195.7, 222.3) 57 (31, 67) 221 falling falling trend -1.4 (-6.1, -0.3)
Washburn County 2 Rural 207.3 (174.9, 244.4) 58 (4, 72) 40 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.4)
Iowa County 2 Urban 207.3 (182.4, 234.9) 59 (9, 71) 59 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Oneida County 2 Rural 206.7 (185.9, 229.3) 60 (13, 70) 98 falling falling trend -4.9 (-14.9, -0.4)
Buffalo County 2 Rural 201.4 (168.5, 239.5) 61 (5, 72) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Chippewa County 2 Urban 201.1 (186.1, 217.2) 62 (33, 70) 149 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Sawyer County 2 Rural 198.2 (168.5, 232.1) 63 (9, 72) 44 falling falling trend -1.9 (-11.9, -0.1)
Taylor County 2 Rural 194.9 (168.1, 225.3) 64 (13, 72) 46 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Eau Claire County 2 Urban 193.0 (180.3, 206.4) 65 (49, 71) 187 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.0)
Richland County 2 Rural 190.4 (161.2, 223.8) 66 (16, 72) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.6)
Polk County 2 Rural 189.4 (171.9, 208.5) 67 (45, 72) 103 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
St. Croix County 2 Urban 189.1 (176.9, 202.0) 68 (52, 71) 195 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.6, 2.6)
Dunn County 2 Rural 189.0 (170.4, 209.0) 69 (41, 72) 85 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Burnett County 2 Rural 181.3 (153.5, 213.7) 70 (29, 72) 41 falling falling trend -17.7 (-25.9, -6.3)
Pierce County 2 Urban 162.2 (144.4, 181.6) 71 (64, 72) 69 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.1)
Pepin County 2 Rural 159.3 (117.8, 211.2) 72 (15, 72) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 3:31 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top