Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Gates County 2 Urban 135.2 (106.5, 170.4) 100 (96, 100) 18 falling falling trend -3.1 (-11.7, -1.3)
Catawba County 2 Urban 232.6 (222.0, 243.6) 72 (39, 90) 403 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.2, -1.0)
Rowan County 2 Urban 243.8 (232.4, 255.5) 50 (20, 82) 387 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.9)
Alleghany County 2 Rural 172.7 (140.4, 211.5) 98 (73, 100) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Graham County 2 Rural 200.6 (157.1, 253.2) 93 (4, 100) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-8.9, 1.2)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 230.6 (223.6, 237.7) 79 (53, 89) 909 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.9, -0.5)
Chatham County 2 Urban 226.4 (211.2, 242.6) 84 (35, 94) 191 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Granville County 2 Rural 282.7 (264.3, 302.2) 4 (1, 36) 196 falling falling trend -0.9 (-3.1, -0.3)
Greene County 2 Rural 227.6 (199.7, 258.6) 82 (8, 97) 52 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Hoke County 2 Urban 240.8 (221.4, 261.4) 59 (9, 92) 120 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 233.3 (225.1, 241.8) 71 (42, 88) 664 falling falling trend -0.8 (-3.1, -0.3)
Wake County 2 Urban 223.2 (219.3, 227.2) 87 (72, 91) 2,537 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Camden County 2 Urban 207.7 (170.7, 251.1) 91 (11, 99) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Guilford County 2 Urban 230.9 (225.0, 236.9) 77 (53, 87) 1,252 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.8, -0.4)
Hertford County 2 Rural 228.6 (199.6, 260.8) 81 (9, 97) 52 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.3)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 223.0 (219.0, 227.1) 88 (72, 91) 2,430 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 235.3 (226.2, 244.7) 67 (38, 87) 545 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 0.1)
Perquimans County 2 Rural 199.6 (164.5, 240.7) 95 (19, 99) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.3)
Watauga County 2 Rural 202.4 (183.5, 222.8) 92 (64, 98) 98 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 240.8 (220.0, 263.2) 57 (8, 93) 119 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Durham County 2 Urban 229.2 (221.6, 237.0) 80 (52, 90) 719 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Henderson County 2 Urban 227.3 (214.7, 240.5) 83 (39, 93) 282 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Lee County 2 Rural 231.6 (214.8, 249.3) 75 (22, 93) 154 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Nash County 2 Urban 230.7 (216.9, 245.2) 78 (32, 93) 234 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 194.7 (172.8, 218.8) 97 (64, 99) 71 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Carteret County 2 Rural 236.7 (220.4, 254.1) 66 (17, 92) 193 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Davidson County 2 Urban 248.8 (238.2, 259.8) 41 (18, 72) 467 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 0.5)
Harnett County 2 Rural 241.3 (229.1, 253.9) 55 (21, 85) 308 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Iredell County 2 Urban 248.8 (238.8, 259.2) 40 (18, 75) 507 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.2)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 277.0 (256.9, 298.4) 6 (1, 53) 163 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Onslow County 2 Urban 266.3 (254.1, 278.8) 14 (3, 47) 392 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 0.5)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 198.7 (179.2, 219.9) 96 (67, 98) 84 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.4)
Pitt County 2 Urban 243.6 (232.4, 255.3) 51 (19, 83) 378 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Randolph County 2 Urban 253.8 (242.2, 265.8) 33 (10, 69) 401 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.3)
Scotland County 2 Rural 250.7 (226.8, 276.5) 38 (3, 90) 87 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Caswell County 2 Rural 262.6 (233.0, 295.3) 21 (1, 89) 68 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Craven County 2 Rural 253.4 (238.8, 268.8) 34 (9, 76) 253 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Macon County 2 Rural 213.3 (191.5, 237.2) 89 (27, 98) 86 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Wilkes County 2 Rural 235.0 (218.4, 252.8) 68 (21, 91) 170 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Yadkin County 2 Urban 233.5 (211.7, 257.1) 70 (14, 95) 97 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 232.2 (223.3, 241.4) 73 (44, 89) 528 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 1.9)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 260.6 (240.2, 282.5) 24 (2, 78) 140 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Haywood County 2 Rural 242.8 (225.2, 261.5) 53 (11, 90) 166 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Orange County 2 Urban 225.7 (214.3, 237.5) 86 (47, 93) 319 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Wilson County 2 Rural 238.1 (222.8, 254.1) 64 (18, 90) 202 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 246.3 (238.1, 254.7) 46 (23, 70) 731 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.3)
Johnston County 2 Urban 242.9 (233.7, 252.3) 52 (26, 78) 551 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Madison County 2 Urban 258.2 (227.8, 291.9) 28 (1, 91) 59 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 231.5 (205.5, 260.2) 76 (7, 97) 66 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Northampton County 2 Rural 248.3 (214.4, 286.6) 43 (2, 95) 49 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Richmond County 2 Rural 273.6 (251.7, 297.0) 9 (1, 63) 127 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 0.8)
Alamance County 2 Urban 244.6 (234.0, 255.6) 48 (22, 81) 436 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.6)
Moore County 2 Urban 257.0 (242.3, 272.3) 29 (6, 71) 258 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Yancey County 2 Rural 244.8 (213.3, 280.1) 47 (2, 96) 51 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 244.2 (231.7, 257.3) 49 (16, 84) 395 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 248.4 (221.7, 277.8) 42 (3, 94) 81 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 1.1)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 250.0 (235.8, 265.0) 39 (9, 79) 268 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Surry County 2 Rural 240.5 (224.7, 257.2) 60 (16, 90) 192 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Swain County 2 Rural 285.1 (246.4, 328.7) 3 (1, 84) 44 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Clay County 2 Rural 208.0 (170.5, 252.6) 90 (8, 99) 28 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.6)
Gaston County 2 Urban 261.5 (252.2, 271.1) 22 (8, 50) 640 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7)
Halifax County 2 Rural 261.0 (240.7, 282.7) 23 (2, 78) 143 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Martin County 2 Rural 280.0 (248.4, 314.9) 5 (1, 77) 69 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Stokes County 2 Urban 246.8 (226.5, 268.6) 45 (6, 90) 129 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Vance County 2 Rural 264.0 (241.8, 287.8) 18 (2, 79) 118 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.2)
Franklin County 2 Urban 240.8 (224.8, 257.7) 58 (15, 90) 187 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 242.7 (228.4, 257.8) 54 (14, 87) 242 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
Robeson County 2 Rural 258.8 (245.4, 272.8) 26 (5, 65) 302 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Burke County 2 Urban 252.1 (237.3, 267.6) 37 (8, 78) 251 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.1)
Ashe County 2 Rural 232.0 (206.1, 260.6) 74 (8, 96) 70 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Bladen County 2 Rural 256.8 (231.1, 284.9) 31 (2, 89) 85 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Dare County 2 Rural 226.1 (204.8, 249.2) 85 (21, 96) 101 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Jones County 2 Rural 252.8 (208.1, 305.3) 35 (1, 97) 28 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.8)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 256.2 (238.7, 274.7) 32 (4, 78) 185 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Sampson County 2 Rural 267.1 (248.2, 287.1) 12 (2, 63) 163 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.4)
Union County 2 Urban 240.9 (232.2, 249.9) 56 (29, 81) 607 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.3)
Bertie County 2 Rural 264.0 (229.7, 302.3) 19 (1, 92) 51 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.3)
Columbus County 2 Rural 256.9 (237.4, 277.7) 30 (3, 84) 142 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.6)
Davie County 2 Urban 265.0 (243.4, 288.2) 16 (2, 72) 127 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.3)
Jackson County 2 Rural 238.6 (216.4, 262.6) 63 (5, 94) 97 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Mitchell County 2 Rural 260.0 (223.1, 301.9) 25 (1, 94) 42 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.0)
Pamlico County 2 Rural 266.2 (224.9, 314.0) 15 (1, 94) 39 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Pender County 2 Urban 262.9 (245.1, 281.8) 20 (3, 70) 178 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Person County 2 Urban 252.5 (230.4, 276.2) 36 (3, 88) 114 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Alexander County 2 Urban 237.5 (215.8, 261.1) 65 (8, 94) 97 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
McDowell County 2 Rural 267.0 (246.0, 289.5) 13 (2, 76) 136 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.6)
Chowan County 2 Rural 248.0 (210.3, 291.1) 44 (1, 97) 38 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.8)
Stanly County 2 Rural 265.0 (246.7, 284.3) 17 (2, 67) 174 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.1)
Warren County 2 Rural 233.5 (202.7, 268.3) 69 (5, 97) 51 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Avery County 2 Rural 200.5 (172.2, 232.7) 94 (37, 99) 40 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.3)
Hyde County 2 Rural 240.1 (180.8, 315.2) 61 (1, 99) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.3)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 258.8 (243.3, 275.1) 27 (4, 69) 236 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 1.8)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 274.7 (259.9, 290.1) 8 (2, 40) 291 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.7, 1.7)
Polk County 2 Rural 239.3 (205.7, 277.2) 62 (2, 97) 48 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 3.8)
Wayne County 2 Urban 271.9 (258.1, 286.3) 10 (2, 42) 319 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.9, 1.8)
Duplin County 2 Rural 268.5 (247.6, 290.7) 11 (2, 69) 137 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.8, 2.7)
Currituck County 2 Urban 143.6 (125.2, 164.3) 99 (97, 100) 50 stable stable trend 2.4 (-9.4, 11.7)
Anson County 2 Urban 308.7 (275.9, 344.6) 2 (1, 35) 72 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.5, 4.1)
Tyrrell County 2 Rural 328.0 (243.3, 435.0) 1 (1, 96) 12 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.1, 7.6)
Washington County 2 Rural 276.6 (231.4, 328.7) 7 (1, 93) 34 rising rising trend 15.2 (2.7, 22.8)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 5:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top