Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Maryland by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Maryland 6 N/A 225.6 (223.9, 227.3) N/A 14,807 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 201.4 (197.6, 205.3) 23 (22, 24) 2,226 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Baltimore County 6 Urban 239.1 (234.3, 243.9) 14 (9, 17) 2,146 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.3)
Prince Georges County 6 Urban 197.1 (193.2, 201.1) 24 (22, 24) 2,019 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Baltimore City 6 Urban 250.1 (244.3, 256.1) 8 (3, 13) 1,514 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Anne Arundel County 6 Urban 229.0 (223.5, 234.6) 17 (13, 21) 1,425 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Howard County 6 Urban 215.8 (208.8, 223.0) 21 (18, 22) 752 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Harford County 6 Urban 243.5 (235.1, 252.1) 11 (5, 17) 702 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
Frederick County 6 Urban 224.7 (216.7, 232.9) 20 (14, 22) 640 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 2.9)
Carroll County 6 Urban 248.4 (238.1, 259.2) 10 (3, 16) 486 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Charles County 6 Urban 225.8 (215.9, 236.2) 19 (12, 22) 412 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Washington County 6 Urban 236.0 (225.2, 247.1) 16 (7, 20) 393 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Cecil County 6 Urban 252.1 (238.6, 266.3) 6 (2, 16) 293 stable stable trend -4.5 (-10.4, 0.6)
St. Marys County 6 Urban 241.7 (228.9, 255.0) 13 (4, 19) 287 stable stable trend -0.6 (-7.7, 0.4)
Wicomico County 6 Urban 254.4 (240.0, 269.5) 5 (2, 15) 258 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Calvert County 6 Urban 227.7 (214.3, 241.8) 18 (9, 22) 242 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.6)
Allegany County 6 Rural 279.2 (261.3, 298.0) 1 (1, 6) 202 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.0)
Worcester County 6 Rural 268.2 (247.6, 290.1) 3 (1, 13) 158 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.8)
Queen Annes County 6 Urban 242.2 (223.1, 262.6) 12 (2, 21) 140 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4)
Talbot County 6 Rural 249.6 (225.5, 275.6) 9 (1, 21) 99 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Dorchester County 6 Rural 260.0 (235.0, 287.1) 4 (1, 19) 95 stable stable trend 2.0 (-4.8, 6.8)
Caroline County 6 Rural 239.0 (216.3, 263.6) 15 (2, 22) 91 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Garrett County 6 Rural 207.6 (184.3, 233.3) 22 (12, 24) 68 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Somerset County 6 Urban 250.6 (222.6, 281.4) 7 (1, 22) 65 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Kent County 6 Rural 269.3 (235.2, 307.4) 2 (1, 20) 56 rising rising trend 8.8 (1.3, 17.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 6:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top