Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 2 N/A 236.3 (234.5, 238.2) N/A 13,720 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 223.5 (223.3, 223.8) N/A 753,674 falling falling trend -0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 230.1 (210.6, 251.1) 59 (16, 85) 118 falling falling trend -7.3 (-11.7, -1.6)
Swift County 2 Rural 201.2 (162.3, 247.3) 87 (14, 87) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.5)
Benton County 2 Urban 217.0 (196.7, 238.8) 80 (25, 87) 88 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Wadena County 2 Rural 218.6 (183.8, 258.3) 78 (9, 87) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Big Stone County 2 Rural 270.2 (203.4, 352.7) 10 (1, 87) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 2.9)
Cass County 2 Rural 220.4 (195.9, 247.3) 76 (18, 87) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural 215.6 (166.0, 276.6) 82 (2, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.2)
Nobles County 2 Rural 207.6 (180.1, 238.1) 86 (25, 87) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Stearns County 2 Urban 227.1 (215.7, 238.8) 65 (33, 82) 332 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 232.9 (203.3, 265.8) 55 (8, 87) 52 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 221.4 (217.6, 225.2) 74 (56, 80) 2,824 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 231.5 (210.2, 254.3) 57 (13, 85) 101 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
McLeod County 2 Rural 212.6 (191.6, 235.3) 84 (29, 87) 83 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Rock County 2 Urban 222.4 (180.4, 271.8) 71 (3, 87) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 2.6)
Roseau County 2 Rural 215.4 (183.1, 252.1) 83 (11, 87) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Dodge County 2 Urban 243.6 (213.7, 276.6) 41 (4, 86) 51 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.6)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 227.5 (221.5, 233.5) 62 (43, 76) 1,197 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.2)
Winona County 2 Rural 216.0 (196.3, 237.3) 81 (31, 87) 101 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Carver County 2 Urban 227.2 (214.5, 240.3) 64 (31, 83) 259 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Cottonwood County 2 Rural 223.4 (183.0, 270.3) 70 (4, 87) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 1.8)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 221.7 (197.2, 248.6) 72 (17, 87) 70 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.1, 1.2)
Koochiching County 2 Rural 218.3 (182.5, 260.1) 79 (8, 87) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.1)
Lyon County 2 Rural 225.0 (198.2, 254.4) 68 (12, 87) 56 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Mower County 2 Rural 232.5 (210.8, 255.8) 56 (12, 85) 92 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 236.2 (211.9, 262.5) 52 (10, 85) 74 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Scott County 2 Urban 223.5 (212.9, 234.5) 69 (41, 83) 349 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 241.6 (205.5, 283.2) 43 (3, 87) 45 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Carlton County 2 Urban 226.2 (204.9, 249.2) 67 (19, 86) 92 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Houston County 2 Urban 220.2 (190.2, 254.1) 77 (12, 87) 46 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.6)
Kanabec County 2 Rural 226.9 (195.0, 263.1) 66 (9, 87) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.7)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 235.0 (210.1, 262.3) 54 (10, 85) 72 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 238.0 (212.2, 266.4) 48 (9, 86) 70 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Pine County 2 Rural 244.9 (220.1, 272.0) 40 (5, 82) 86 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Stevens County 2 Rural 248.7 (198.8, 307.0) 32 (1, 87) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Pope County 2 Rural 252.1 (209.2, 301.7) 25 (1, 87) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 279.5 (267.5, 292.0) 6 (2, 22) 438 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Todd County 2 Rural 236.8 (209.0, 267.6) 50 (6, 86) 63 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3)
Wright County 2 Urban 231.2 (220.0, 242.9) 58 (29, 79) 334 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
Anoka County 2 Urban 247.3 (240.1, 254.7) 36 (18, 53) 966 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.9)
Dakota County 2 Urban 246.6 (240.0, 253.4) 37 (19, 53) 1,126 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.8)
Martin County 2 Rural 239.5 (207.9, 274.9) 44 (4, 86) 49 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.0)
Meeker County 2 Rural 221.6 (194.3, 251.8) 73 (13, 87) 56 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Rice County 2 Rural 236.8 (219.7, 254.8) 51 (15, 81) 157 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 238.4 (224.8, 252.7) 47 (17, 76) 237 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Faribault County 2 Rural 239.4 (202.6, 281.4) 45 (3, 87) 36 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.6)
Jackson County 2 Rural 248.3 (205.5, 298.1) 33 (1, 87) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-13.0, 3.6)
Kittson County 2 Rural 256.0 (190.3, 339.4) 20 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 2.9)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 248.1 (237.8, 258.7) 34 (14, 57) 513 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.0)
Washington County 2 Urban 248.8 (240.3, 257.5) 31 (16, 53) 707 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 0.9)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 251.4 (210.8, 297.9) 27 (1, 86) 31 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.6)
Cook County 2 Rural 207.8 (154.9, 275.2) 85 (3, 87) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 3.7)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 249.8 (232.0, 268.6) 30 (8, 72) 177 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 267.9 (206.5, 342.8) 14 (1, 87) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.8, 4.2)
Mahnomen County 2 Rural 290.6 (225.7, 369.0) 3 (1, 86) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.5)
Murray County 2 Rural 220.9 (174.1, 277.2) 75 (3, 87) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 3.0)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 229.1 (211.1, 248.1) 60 (18, 84) 132 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.3)
Douglas County 2 Rural 237.3 (214.7, 261.8) 49 (11, 85) 95 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Isanti County 2 Urban 245.0 (223.8, 267.8) 39 (7, 79) 110 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
Grant County 2 Rural 261.4 (203.4, 331.8) 16 (1, 87) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Lake County 2 Rural 227.3 (186.7, 275.0) 63 (4, 87) 28 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.0)
Redwood County 2 Rural 270.3 (232.0, 313.2) 9 (1, 79) 41 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.3)
Steele County 2 Rural 228.8 (206.8, 252.6) 61 (13, 87) 88 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.7)
Itasca County 2 Rural 268.1 (245.9, 291.9) 12 (2, 53) 130 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Morrison County 2 Rural 266.3 (241.4, 293.3) 15 (2, 60) 98 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Pennington County 2 Rural 256.3 (218.6, 298.9) 18 (1, 85) 37 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.7)
Pipestone County 2 Rural 270.7 (223.1, 325.9) 8 (1, 85) 26 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.2)
Polk County 2 Urban 243.4 (218.3, 270.6) 42 (6, 83) 78 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
Wabasha County 2 Urban 251.7 (221.3, 285.5) 26 (3, 83) 59 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.1)
Waseca County 2 Rural 253.5 (221.6, 289.1) 24 (2, 85) 50 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 256.1 (233.6, 280.1) 19 (4, 74) 107 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.8)
Brown County 2 Rural 258.8 (229.9, 290.6) 17 (2, 78) 69 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural 239.3 (196.4, 289.5) 46 (1, 87) 26 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.7)
Becker County 2 Rural 270.1 (244.8, 297.3) 11 (2, 58) 99 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 251.3 (219.7, 286.4) 28 (3, 84) 56 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.6)
Clay County 2 Urban 275.0 (255.7, 295.4) 7 (2, 40) 158 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.6, 2.2)
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural 235.4 (168.0, 323.5) 53 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 4.9)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 255.6 (236.3, 276.1) 22 (4, 64) 163 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.3)
Sibley County 2 Rural 245.4 (209.1, 286.5) 38 (2, 86) 37 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Clearwater County 2 Rural 268.0 (217.5, 327.0) 13 (1, 87) 23 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.6)
Marshall County 2 Rural 253.8 (206.3, 309.3) 23 (1, 87) 23 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 4.0)
Renville County 2 Rural 289.8 (250.0, 334.4) 4 (1, 61) 45 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 3.8)
Watonwan County 2 Rural 255.9 (212.5, 305.7) 21 (1, 87) 28 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 7.4)
Norman County 2 Rural 310.4 (249.4, 382.4) 1 (1, 79) 21 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.7)
Traverse County 2 Rural 306.3 (223.6, 411.9) 2 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.9, 5.5)
Red Lake County 2 Rural 280.4 (207.4, 372.3) 5 (1, 87) 12 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.2, 5.1)
Wilkin County 2 Rural 251.0 (197.9, 314.9) 29 (1, 87) 18 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 6.1)
Chisago County 2 Urban 247.9 (229.8, 267.1) 35 (8, 75) 156 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.2, 11.6)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 12:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top