Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota 2 N/A 227.0 (222.3, 231.8) N/A 1,979 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 223.5 (223.3, 223.8) N/A 753,674 falling falling trend -0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)
Hanson County 2 Rural 123.7 (73.7, 195.6) 63 (32, 63) 4 falling falling trend -35.1 (-58.7, -4.5)
Hyde County 2 Rural 175.4 (94.4, 314.5) 53 (2, 63) 3 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.4, 1.6)
Fall River County 2 Rural 202.7 (155.9, 261.0) 42 (8, 62) 17 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.6, 0.0)
Union County 2 Urban 226.7 (194.3, 263.2) 32 (8, 52) 38 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.7)
Turner County 2 Urban 211.6 (168.4, 263.1) 39 (7, 60) 19 stable stable trend -2.3 (-16.7, 0.7)
Custer County 2 Urban 169.1 (131.3, 216.6) 56 (24, 63) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Tripp County 2 Rural 196.2 (144.5, 261.3) 46 (7, 63) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.4)
Bon Homme County 2 Rural 198.4 (154.0, 252.6) 44 (10, 62) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.7)
Spink County 2 Rural 191.4 (143.8, 250.6) 49 (9, 62) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.0)
Brule County 2 Rural 151.8 (107.7, 209.3) 60 (26, 63) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.2, 3.0)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 170.6 (148.0, 195.9) 55 (38, 62) 50 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Perkins County 2 Rural 148.1 (83.9, 242.9) 61 (9, 63) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.3, 2.8)
Meade County 2 Urban 176.2 (154.6, 200.2) 52 (34, 61) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Pennington County 2 Urban 216.6 (203.8, 230.1) 36 (22, 47) 246 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Day County 2 Rural 208.6 (152.4, 279.8) 40 (5, 62) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.2)
Hutchinson County 2 Rural 215.1 (166.6, 273.6) 37 (5, 61) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Oglala Lakota County 2 Rural 213.0 (174.8, 256.8) 38 (9, 59) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.1)
Bennett County 2 Rural 192.2 (128.4, 277.4) 48 (5, 63) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.7)
Buffalo County 2 Rural 295.0 (185.4, 444.1) 6 (1, 62) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-7.8, 3.3)
Minnehaha County 2 Urban 249.5 (239.2, 260.1) 17 (9, 29) 475 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Butte County 2 Rural 197.9 (159.7, 242.8) 45 (11, 61) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Stanley County 2 Rural 266.2 (186.6, 370.3) 12 (1, 59) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 3.3)
Davison County 2 Rural 216.7 (186.9, 250.1) 35 (10, 54) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Lake County 2 Rural 238.8 (196.4, 288.0) 24 (4, 54) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.1)
Brookings County 2 Rural 239.9 (212.7, 269.6) 23 (7, 45) 61 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.8)
Codington County 2 Rural 235.5 (210.4, 263.0) 27 (8, 45) 72 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Kingsbury County 2 Rural 284.7 (218.9, 365.1) 7 (1, 49) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 3.8)
Hughes County 2 Rural 234.6 (202.5, 270.5) 28 (7, 50) 43 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Walworth County 2 Rural 164.1 (116.0, 226.3) 57 (15, 63) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.4)
Brown County 2 Rural 237.4 (214.7, 261.9) 26 (9, 43) 89 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Jackson County 2 Rural 184.3 (108.5, 290.1) 51 (3, 63) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-7.0, 9.2)
Marshall County 2 Rural 173.2 (124.1, 238.0) 54 (13, 63) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.0, 4.3)
Faulk County 2 Rural 321.4 (217.1, 461.4) 3 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.3, 5.1)
Roberts County 2 Rural 161.2 (124.4, 205.6) 58 (29, 63) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.3)
Charles Mix County 2 Rural 261.2 (210.3, 320.5) 13 (2, 48) 21 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.2)
Hamlin County 2 Rural 190.0 (140.9, 250.7) 50 (10, 63) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.5, 4.9)
Lyman County 2 Rural 246.8 (172.4, 342.2) 19 (1, 61) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 5.0)
Deuel County 2 Rural 228.8 (167.1, 307.2) 30 (2, 61) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.4)
Beadle County 2 Rural 227.5 (196.2, 262.5) 31 (8, 50) 43 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.9)
Moody County 2 Rural 257.2 (200.4, 325.5) 15 (2, 54) 17 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.8)
McCook County 2 Urban 268.1 (207.4, 341.5) 10 (1, 53) 15 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.2, 3.9)
Gregory County 2 Rural 252.1 (180.0, 344.4) 16 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.3, 6.0)
Douglas County 2 Rural 195.5 (127.3, 290.7) 47 (4, 63) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.3, 7.3)
Grant County 2 Rural 219.5 (173.0, 275.5) 34 (6, 59) 18 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 5.9)
Yankton County 2 Rural 241.8 (213.2, 273.4) 21 (6, 45) 59 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.4, 3.7)
Dewey County 2 Rural 311.6 (240.6, 396.6) 5 (1, 42) 14 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 4.3)
Sanborn County 2 Rural 276.2 (181.6, 404.1) 8 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.7, 7.3)
McPherson County 2 Rural 201.8 (128.6, 307.7) 43 (3, 63) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.9, 7.7)
Potter County 2 Rural 267.5 (167.5, 405.3) 11 (1, 62) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.7, 6.8)
Clark County 2 Rural 237.5 (165.9, 330.2) 25 (1, 62) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.6, 6.6)
Clay County 2 Rural 260.8 (216.1, 311.8) 14 (2, 46) 27 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.2, 4.4)
Edmunds County 2 Rural 206.0 (148.1, 281.5) 41 (5, 62) 10 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.6, 7.6)
Aurora County 2 Rural 314.6 (219.2, 437.8) 4 (1, 55) 8 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.5, 7.1)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 241.5 (223.9, 260.1) 22 (9, 38) 144 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.2, 9.8)
Hand County 2 Rural 272.1 (185.7, 385.4) 9 (1, 61) 8 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.5, 8.6)
Todd County 2 Rural 229.7 (179.9, 288.4) 29 (4, 58) 15 rising rising trend 8.4 (1.2, 24.6)
Corson County 2 Rural 156.7 (98.4, 235.6) 59 (11, 63) 5
*
*
Haakon County 2 Rural 246.3 (147.2, 390.2) 20 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Jerauld County 2 Rural 336.2 (211.7, 511.4) 2 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural 340.4 (187.6, 584.2) 1 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Miner County 2 Rural 220.9 (133.8, 344.8) 33 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Sully County 2 Rural 248.9 (141.3, 413.0) 18 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Ziebach County 2 Rural 146.6 (83.6, 239.3) 62 (11, 63) 4
*
*
Campbell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mellette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 7:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top