Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 230.2 (228.0, 232.4) N/A 8,904 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 223.5 (223.3, 223.8) N/A 753,674 falling falling trend -0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)
Cimarron County 2 Rural 169.9 (96.6, 279.5) 74 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 3.1)
Harmon County 2 Rural 184.3 (117.7, 279.4) 72 (1, 77) 5 stable stable trend -8.0 (-33.8, 1.5)
Harper County 2 Rural 165.5 (108.8, 244.2) 76 (8, 77) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.6, 2.8)
Ellis County 2 Rural 217.9 (152.1, 304.0) 59 (1, 77) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 4.0)
Beaver County 2 Rural 160.4 (113.1, 222.1) 77 (22, 77) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.7, 4.8)
Grant County 2 Rural 238.0 (169.6, 325.4) 35 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.0)
Roger Mills County 2 Rural 270.6 (193.9, 369.1) 12 (1, 76) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.7, 6.3)
Greer County 2 Rural 205.8 (155.5, 268.4) 67 (3, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.3, 3.9)
Dewey County 2 Rural 272.7 (203.9, 357.9) 9 (1, 75) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.8, 4.5)
Cotton County 2 Urban 197.8 (148.8, 259.3) 71 (4, 77) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.8)
Alfalfa County 2 Rural 205.1 (158.1, 263.9) 68 (4, 77) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.8)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 258.1 (196.1, 334.1) 19 (1, 76) 14 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.2)
Coal County 2 Rural 289.2 (223.5, 368.8) 1 (1, 71) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.4)
Tillman County 2 Rural 209.3 (162.1, 266.7) 64 (3, 77) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Major County 2 Rural 198.1 (153.7, 251.9) 70 (9, 77) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Love County 2 Rural 178.6 (142.6, 221.3) 73 (29, 77) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-9.5, 1.2)
Woods County 2 Rural 253.0 (202.4, 312.5) 24 (1, 75) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 3.1)
Blaine County 2 Rural 214.6 (171.8, 265.5) 62 (4, 77) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Nowata County 2 Rural 230.9 (189.2, 279.8) 43 (2, 75) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Kiowa County 2 Rural 287.5 (235.4, 348.2) 2 (1, 65) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.1)
Latimer County 2 Rural 286.3 (237.3, 342.8) 3 (1, 65) 28 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.5)
Johnston County 2 Rural 281.4 (234.1, 335.6) 4 (1, 66) 28 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.9)
Noble County 2 Rural 257.5 (214.8, 306.5) 20 (1, 70) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.6)
Pushmataha County 2 Rural 240.1 (199.4, 287.3) 32 (2, 73) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Murray County 2 Rural 202.6 (169.0, 241.4) 69 (17, 77) 29 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Washita County 2 Rural 274.2 (228.6, 326.4) 7 (1, 67) 29 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.2, 3.9)
Haskell County 2 Rural 268.4 (226.5, 316.2) 14 (1, 67) 32 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.1)
Atoka County 2 Rural 229.5 (194.4, 269.4) 44 (3, 74) 33 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 2.9)
Hughes County 2 Rural 246.1 (208.6, 288.8) 31 (1, 72) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Okfuskee County 2 Rural 269.0 (227.6, 316.1) 13 (1, 68) 33 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.8)
Woodward County 2 Rural 169.9 (144.3, 198.8) 75 (60, 77) 33 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Craig County 2 Rural 236.1 (200.8, 276.2) 36 (3, 73) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Marshall County 2 Rural 231.8 (197.7, 270.5) 41 (4, 74) 38 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.3)
Texas County 2 Rural 208.3 (180.0, 239.7) 66 (19, 76) 40 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Kingfisher County 2 Rural 271.9 (234.3, 314.0) 11 (1, 63) 41 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.3)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 274.7 (235.7, 318.5) 6 (1, 65) 41 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Pawnee County 2 Urban 250.3 (215.7, 289.1) 26 (2, 69) 42 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.1)
Adair County 2 Rural 226.5 (196.7, 259.7) 48 (8, 73) 45 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 1.9)
Beckham County 2 Rural 223.8 (195.7, 254.9) 53 (10, 73) 49 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Jackson County 2 Rural 225.8 (197.9, 256.6) 50 (10, 74) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.8, -0.2)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 247.4 (215.2, 283.3) 29 (2, 70) 52 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Custer County 2 Rural 214.4 (188.5, 242.7) 63 (19, 74) 54 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Seminole County 2 Rural 234.1 (206.9, 264.1) 38 (6, 71) 59 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9)
Caddo County 2 Rural 226.5 (201.1, 254.4) 47 (11, 72) 61 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Garvin County 2 Rural 265.9 (236.8, 297.7) 16 (1, 57) 66 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 272.5 (245.1, 302.1) 10 (1, 46) 80 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 2.9)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 275.6 (248.5, 304.9) 5 (1, 42) 83 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.3)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 238.3 (215.4, 263.3) 34 (8, 68) 90 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.8)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 250.3 (226.8, 275.5) 25 (4, 62) 91 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Delaware County 2 Rural 225.4 (204.3, 248.3) 51 (16, 71) 101 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.7)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 274.1 (249.4, 300.6) 8 (1, 41) 101 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.3)
McClain County 2 Urban 238.6 (217.7, 261.0) 33 (9, 67) 102 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Stephens County 2 Rural 227.1 (206.5, 249.2) 46 (16, 71) 102 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Bryan County 2 Rural 233.7 (213.3, 255.5) 39 (12, 68) 103 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Kay County 2 Rural 246.6 (224.9, 269.8) 30 (5, 61) 106 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 259.7 (236.9, 284.1) 18 (2, 51) 106 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.1)
Carter County 2 Rural 218.4 (199.5, 238.8) 57 (23, 72) 107 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Mayes County 2 Rural 267.2 (244.0, 292.1) 15 (1, 49) 109 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 248.6 (227.2, 271.5) 27 (5, 60) 110 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.1)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 232.4 (212.8, 253.4) 40 (14, 68) 113 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 1.9)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 254.6 (233.1, 277.5) 22 (4, 53) 114 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6)
Logan County 2 Urban 216.5 (198.3, 236.0) 61 (26, 72) 115 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.4)
Osage County 2 Urban 224.7 (205.3, 245.5) 52 (18, 71) 115 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6)
Washington County 2 Rural 235.5 (216.3, 256.1) 37 (13, 67) 123 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Grady County 2 Urban 220.0 (202.5, 238.7) 55 (25, 71) 129 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Garfield County 2 Urban 216.8 (199.7, 235.0) 60 (28, 73) 130 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.6)
Payne County 2 Rural 254.1 (236.0, 273.3) 23 (5, 50) 157 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 263.8 (245.9, 282.7) 17 (3, 41) 175 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.6)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 255.3 (238.5, 273.0) 21 (5, 46) 185 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 229.1 (214.3, 244.7) 45 (22, 67) 191 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Creek County 2 Urban 248.2 (231.9, 265.5) 28 (7, 52) 191 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.9)
Rogers County 2 Urban 220.8 (207.3, 235.1) 54 (30, 70) 217 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Comanche County 2 Urban 225.9 (213.2, 239.2) 49 (26, 67) 255 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Canadian County 2 Urban 218.2 (207.5, 229.3) 58 (36, 70) 326 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 208.7 (200.9, 216.8) 65 (49, 72) 571 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 231.6 (226.2, 237.1) 42 (30, 55) 1,484 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.2)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 219.4 (214.6, 224.4) 56 (42, 66) 1,646 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 8:09 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top