Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 242.1 (239.5, 244.7) N/A 7,317 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 223.5 (223.3, 223.8) N/A 753,674 falling falling trend -0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 201.4 (180.8, 223.9) 80 (46, 81) 75 falling falling trend -13.3 (-22.5, -2.7)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 200.7 (179.6, 223.8) 81 (50, 81) 71 falling falling trend -7.1 (-13.6, -2.9)
Smith County 2 Rural 274.0 (236.1, 316.6) 14 (2, 75) 42 stable stable trend -7.1 (-17.3, 3.5)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 227.3 (203.2, 253.6) 68 (18, 81) 71 falling falling trend -6.9 (-14.2, -2.5)
Marshall County 2 Urban 231.0 (208.9, 255.0) 62 (19, 80) 90 falling falling trend -4.9 (-12.0, -0.2)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 275.3 (241.9, 312.2) 13 (2, 64) 55 stable stable trend -4.2 (-12.5, 1.7)
DeSoto County 2 Urban 222.8 (213.2, 232.8) 71 (48, 78) 414 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.5, 0.1)
Scott County 2 Urban 213.9 (189.7, 240.6) 76 (30, 81) 61 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.6, -1.7)
Leake County 2 Rural 229.8 (201.2, 261.5) 64 (11, 81) 50 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.0, 0.1)
Coahoma County 2 Rural 298.7 (265.0, 335.6) 4 (1, 42) 65 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.5, 0.9)
Panola County 2 Rural 242.1 (218.7, 267.5) 44 (11, 79) 87 stable stable trend -1.4 (-7.7, 0.3)
Franklin County 2 Rural 212.9 (168.6, 266.2) 77 (9, 81) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1)
Leflore County 2 Rural 264.2 (236.3, 294.5) 19 (3, 71) 71 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.9, 1.4)
Lee County 2 Rural 248.6 (233.4, 264.6) 34 (14, 66) 213 falling falling trend -1.0 (-4.8, -0.1)
Harrison County 2 Urban 235.5 (226.1, 245.2) 58 (32, 70) 511 falling falling trend -0.9 (-3.9, -0.1)
Rankin County 2 Urban 218.6 (208.2, 229.3) 72 (51, 79) 348 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Winston County 2 Rural 216.5 (185.7, 251.2) 73 (15, 81) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.9, -0.1)
Stone County 2 Urban 230.9 (200.6, 264.8) 63 (11, 81) 46 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Copiah County 2 Urban 241.8 (215.7, 270.4) 45 (9, 79) 71 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Madison County 2 Urban 239.1 (226.2, 252.6) 52 (25, 70) 273 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Clarke County 2 Rural 228.5 (194.5, 267.1) 65 (9, 81) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 1.9)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 211.7 (193.0, 231.6) 78 (43, 81) 101 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Pike County 2 Rural 263.8 (240.7, 288.6) 20 (5, 62) 104 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Yazoo County 2 Urban 249.3 (222.6, 278.4) 33 (7, 77) 66 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Adams County 2 Rural 225.7 (201.3, 252.6) 69 (19, 81) 72 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Forrest County 2 Urban 256.7 (239.5, 274.8) 30 (9, 61) 178 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Holmes County 2 Urban 261.3 (225.8, 301.0) 27 (2, 78) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 255.1 (226.7, 286.3) 31 (5, 76) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Wilkinson County 2 Rural 262.0 (215.5, 316.2) 25 (2, 81) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.6)
Hinds County 2 Urban 261.4 (251.6, 271.5) 26 (12, 42) 589 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3)
Jackson County 2 Urban 240.0 (228.8, 251.7) 49 (25, 69) 374 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 241.5 (223.1, 261.0) 47 (16, 76) 141 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.3, 1.4)
Warren County 2 Rural 232.5 (212.2, 254.2) 60 (20, 79) 109 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Lamar County 2 Urban 227.5 (210.9, 245.1) 67 (28, 79) 144 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 227.7 (212.0, 244.4) 66 (31, 79) 170 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 246.4 (227.4, 266.6) 39 (12, 72) 139 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Webster County 2 Rural 247.4 (204.7, 296.8) 36 (3, 81) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Attala County 2 Rural 225.3 (194.2, 260.1) 70 (11, 81) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Jones County 2 Rural 246.3 (229.1, 264.6) 40 (15, 71) 166 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Kemper County 2 Rural 260.3 (212.0, 316.9) 28 (2, 81) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Perry County 2 Urban 263.0 (222.5, 309.3) 22 (2, 79) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.8)
Amite County 2 Rural 256.7 (217.1, 302.1) 29 (2, 81) 38 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.0)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 242.4 (209.7, 278.9) 43 (5, 81) 43 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 265.2 (213.2, 326.7) 18 (1, 81) 21 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 2.9)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 266.5 (225.4, 313.3) 17 (2, 79) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.4)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 243.5 (217.4, 271.9) 42 (9, 79) 68 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Union County 2 Rural 236.1 (210.5, 264.2) 56 (12, 80) 65 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Hancock County 2 Urban 249.5 (229.3, 271.3) 32 (11, 73) 132 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Newton County 2 Rural 240.6 (210.3, 274.1) 48 (8, 81) 49 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Noxubee County 2 Rural 235.8 (193.2, 285.1) 57 (3, 81) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.3)
Wayne County 2 Rural 238.8 (207.8, 273.4) 53 (8, 81) 48 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Jasper County 2 Rural 281.3 (244.1, 322.9) 10 (1, 69) 46 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 215.8 (194.3, 239.0) 74 (32, 81) 81 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Simpson County 2 Urban 243.9 (217.1, 273.2) 41 (8, 79) 67 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.6)
Tate County 2 Urban 233.6 (208.6, 261.0) 59 (15, 80) 69 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 246.4 (218.5, 277.1) 38 (6, 77) 61 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Sharkey County 2 Rural 270.1 (197.1, 362.7) 15 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.3)
Yalobusha County 2 Rural 291.4 (249.6, 338.6) 6 (1, 61) 39 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 2.0)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 237.2 (194.7, 286.8) 54 (3, 81) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.8)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 275.8 (249.5, 304.2) 12 (3, 57) 86 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.3)
Washington County 2 Rural 262.0 (240.6, 284.9) 24 (5, 62) 126 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.5)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 317.1 (260.1, 383.2) 3 (1, 65) 25 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.8)
Monroe County 2 Rural 284.0 (258.4, 311.5) 7 (2, 46) 101 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.0)
Sunflower County 2 Rural 241.7 (215.3, 270.5) 46 (9, 80) 64 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.5)
Tunica County 2 Urban 296.2 (248.3, 350.8) 5 (1, 70) 29 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.4)
George County 2 Rural 215.8 (190.1, 244.1) 75 (25, 81) 55 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.1)
Marion County 2 Rural 263.7 (235.2, 294.9) 21 (3, 71) 68 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.3)
Benton County 2 Urban 279.7 (228.5, 339.7) 11 (1, 79) 24 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.9, 5.4)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 262.3 (224.0, 305.8) 23 (2, 79) 38 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 3.1)
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 239.8 (201.9, 283.1) 50 (5, 81) 30 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.2)
Carroll County 2 Rural 239.6 (197.6, 288.8) 51 (3, 81) 26 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.7, 4.2)
Grenada County 2 Rural 318.3 (284.4, 355.4) 2 (1, 22) 70 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.3)
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural 282.3 (238.6, 332.3) 9 (1, 73) 34 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.7)
Greene County 2 Rural 206.6 (174.2, 243.8) 79 (22, 81) 30 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 3.9)
Covington County 2 Rural 283.0 (248.8, 320.8) 8 (2, 62) 54 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.6)
Clay County 2 Rural 248.6 (216.7, 284.0) 35 (5, 79) 50 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.1)
Tippah County 2 Rural 269.5 (238.6, 303.5) 16 (2, 68) 60 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 3.4)
Walthall County 2 Rural 247.3 (210.3, 289.4) 37 (3, 81) 36 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 3.6)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 236.2 (187.8, 293.4) 55 (3, 81) 19 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 4.0)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 232.2 (187.2, 285.7) 61 (4, 81) 21 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.1, 5.0)
Quitman County 2 Rural 368.8 (304.2, 444.2) 1 (1, 24) 25 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.4)
Issaquena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 9:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top