Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 105.0 (102.8, 107.2) N/A 1,822 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 105.7 (105.5, 105.9) N/A 211,922 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.2)
Smith County 2 Rural 100.4 (71.3, 137.2) 55 (2, 80) 8 falling falling trend -37.5 (-60.3, -4.3)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 93.0 (73.7, 115.6) 64 (13, 80) 16 falling falling trend -19.4 (-32.0, -4.4)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 98.3 (80.0, 119.5) 58 (12, 80) 20 falling falling trend -8.9 (-24.4, -0.3)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 101.7 (81.1, 125.8) 50 (6, 79) 17 falling falling trend -6.1 (-14.9, -1.4)
Coahoma County 2 Rural 117.7 (90.7, 149.9) 20 (1, 77) 13 falling falling trend -4.3 (-18.1, -0.4)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 127.4 (98.6, 161.9) 10 (1, 73) 13 falling falling trend -4.2 (-10.1, -1.1)
Scott County 2 Urban 89.5 (70.2, 112.4) 72 (14, 80) 15 falling falling trend -3.3 (-8.7, -1.0)
Sunflower County 2 Rural 83.6 (64.7, 106.3) 77 (21, 80) 13 stable stable trend -2.7 (-10.4, 0.5)
Panola County 2 Rural 88.9 (70.6, 110.4) 73 (20, 80) 16 stable stable trend -2.2 (-16.0, 1.0)
Washington County 2 Rural 101.1 (83.7, 120.8) 51 (10, 79) 24 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.8, 0.1)
Winston County 2 Rural 93.2 (68.2, 124.3) 63 (7, 80) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 0.9)
Franklin County 2 Rural 82.9 (48.2, 132.5) 78 (3, 80) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.8, 2.4)
Stone County 2 Urban 92.7 (68.7, 122.4) 66 (8, 80) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.3)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 90.0 (73.0, 109.9) 68 (19, 80) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.4)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 96.0 (74.2, 122.1) 61 (8, 80) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.1, 2.6)
Attala County 2 Rural 88.7 (64.1, 119.3) 74 (9, 80) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 1.8)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 93.3 (78.4, 110.0) 62 (21, 80) 29 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Rankin County 2 Urban 98.5 (90.1, 107.5) 56 (25, 72) 100 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Union County 2 Rural 107.3 (86.2, 131.9) 42 (5, 78) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.7)
Wilkinson County 2 Rural 90.6 (56.5, 137.4) 71 (2, 80) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.7, 3.4)
Yazoo County 2 Urban 100.6 (80.7, 123.8) 54 (7, 80) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.0)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 90.7 (65.5, 122.1) 70 (8, 80) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 2.3)
Lee County 2 Rural 104.7 (92.4, 118.1) 46 (14, 72) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Jones County 2 Rural 107.3 (93.0, 123.2) 41 (10, 72) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.8)
Perry County 2 Urban 113.4 (80.5, 155.3) 29 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.0)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 90.7 (73.6, 110.4) 69 (19, 80) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-12.9, 5.1)
Jackson County 2 Urban 99.8 (90.7, 109.7) 52 (23, 71) 87 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Clarke County 2 Rural 108.7 (78.8, 145.9) 38 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 2.7)
Wayne County 2 Rural 125.6 (97.6, 158.8) 14 (1, 75) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.5, 3.8)
Quitman County 2 Rural 126.6 (78.9, 192.0) 11 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.6, 4.7)
Adams County 2 Rural 95.5 (75.3, 119.3) 59 (11, 80) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 2.8)
Amite County 2 Rural 115.6 (80.8, 160.0) 22 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 2.9)
Forrest County 2 Urban 107.3 (93.7, 122.2) 40 (9, 71) 46 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Hinds County 2 Urban 113.0 (105.0, 121.5) 25 (11, 51) 149 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Leake County 2 Rural 109.6 (85.5, 138.3) 33 (3, 79) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Marion County 2 Rural 108.0 (85.2, 135.0) 39 (3, 79) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.9)
Simpson County 2 Urban 100.7 (79.0, 126.4) 53 (6, 80) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 1.9)
Harrison County 2 Urban 95.8 (88.2, 103.9) 60 (33, 74) 118 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Warren County 2 Rural 110.8 (93.3, 130.6) 32 (4, 73) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 1.9)
Carroll County 2 Rural 106.0 (70.9, 152.7) 44 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.6, 5.1)
Copiah County 2 Urban 109.8 (87.6, 135.7) 31 (3, 77) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.7)
Hancock County 2 Urban 118.6 (100.4, 139.2) 19 (2, 68) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.2)
Holmes County 2 Urban 115.5 (85.8, 151.7) 23 (1, 79) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.1)
George County 2 Rural 78.0 (58.9, 101.1) 80 (29, 80) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.2)
Jasper County 2 Rural 129.9 (98.1, 168.6) 7 (1, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.0)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 114.6 (81.0, 157.1) 21 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.0, 4.7)
Madison County 2 Urban 113.9 (102.9, 125.8) 26 (8, 58) 78 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.7)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 125.8 (103.8, 150.9) 12 (1, 66) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.2)
Webster County 2 Rural 109.0 (73.4, 155.4) 37 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.4, 4.0)
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural 132.9 (94.7, 181.1) 5 (1, 79) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 3.5)
Lamar County 2 Urban 98.9 (85.8, 113.4) 57 (18, 77) 41 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.5)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 115.1 (91.4, 143.0) 24 (2, 76) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.8)
Tate County 2 Urban 88.2 (68.7, 111.5) 75 (14, 80) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.1)
Tunica County 2 Urban 113.5 (78.9, 157.9) 28 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.2, 4.6)
Grenada County 2 Rural 140.7 (112.2, 173.9) 2 (1, 60) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 104.9 (91.5, 119.7) 47 (12, 73) 45 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.0)
Leflore County 2 Rural 104.6 (82.9, 130.0) 48 (4, 79) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 2.9)
DeSoto County 2 Urban 104.7 (96.7, 113.2) 45 (18, 64) 127 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.7)
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 112.5 (81.2, 151.7) 30 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.4)
Kemper County 2 Rural 113.8 (74.0, 166.6) 27 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 3.8)
Marshall County 2 Urban 82.5 (65.3, 102.8) 79 (29, 80) 16 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.4)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 152.8 (104.1, 215.8) 1 (1, 78) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.9, 4.9)
Covington County 2 Rural 104.2 (78.2, 135.9) 49 (2, 80) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.8)
Monroe County 2 Rural 137.6 (115.0, 163.2) 3 (1, 47) 26 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.7, 4.1)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 109.2 (93.6, 126.4) 36 (7, 72) 36 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 3.5)
Yalobusha County 2 Rural 120.5 (87.0, 162.6) 18 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.7)
Newton County 2 Rural 120.8 (94.6, 151.8) 17 (1, 75) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.3, 4.6)
Noxubee County 2 Rural 129.4 (90.7, 178.6) 8 (1, 78) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.0, 6.6)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 125.7 (92.1, 167.4) 13 (1, 78) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 4.8)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 128.1 (110.9, 147.3) 9 (1, 51) 40 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 3.1)
Greene County 2 Rural 79.5 (56.0, 109.8) 76 (10, 80) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 6.3)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 92.8 (59.3, 138.0) 65 (2, 80) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.5, 6.4)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 91.2 (55.6, 140.8) 67 (2, 80) 4 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.5, 8.2)
Tippah County 2 Rural 131.7 (104.9, 163.0) 6 (1, 70) 17 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.6, 4.9)
Walthall County 2 Rural 135.3 (101.3, 177.0) 4 (1, 74) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.7, 7.2)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 121.4 (78.9, 177.3) 16 (1, 80) 5 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.6, 7.5)
Pike County 2 Rural 110.0 (91.5, 131.1) 34 (4, 75) 25 stable stable trend 12.5 (-2.8, 25.4)
Clay County 2 Rural 106.3 (80.0, 138.3) 43 (2, 80) 11 rising rising trend 14.6 (3.4, 23.5)
Benton County 2 Urban 124.9 (82.1, 181.9) 15 (1, 80) 5
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural 110.3 (69.0, 166.6) 35 (1, 80) 4
*
*
Issaquena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 6:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top