Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Recentaapc

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.7 (105.5, 105.9) N/A 211,922 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.2)
Puerto Rico 2 103.6 (101.5, 105.7) N/A 1,946 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.7)
Pennsylvania 2 109.0 (107.9, 110.0) 18 (13, 25) 8,154 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.3)
Oregon 2 96.7 (95.0, 98.4) 45 (41, 50) 2,539 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.8, -0.4)
Massachusetts 2 99.1 (97.7, 100.4) 42 (39, 45) 4,158 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.8)
District of Columbia 2 98.2 (94.1, 102.5) 43 (34, 50) 455 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Rhode Island 2 103.4 (99.9, 107.0) 36 (18, 43) 658 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.9, -0.7)
Arizona 2 95.8 (94.4, 97.1) 48 (43, 50) 4,054 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Indiana 2 106.3 (104.8, 107.7) 31 (20, 35) 4,274 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.2, -0.1)
South Carolina 2 102.0 (100.4, 103.7) 39 (34, 42) 3,059 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.5, -0.2)
Arkansas 2 108.3 (106.1, 110.5) 22 (12, 34) 1,918 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Delaware 2 110.5 (106.6, 114.5) 13 (3, 33) 613 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 0.0)
Michigan 2 105.7 (104.5, 106.9) 32 (23, 36) 6,134 falling falling trend -0.4 (-1.3, -0.1)
Virginia 2 95.4 (94.3, 96.6) 49 (44, 50) 5,072 falling falling trend -0.4 (-1.1, -0.1)
Tennessee 2 105.4 (104.0, 106.8) 33 (24, 37) 4,402 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
Hawaii 7 105.4 (102.3, 108.5) 27 (12, 38) 924 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.3)
New Hampshire 2 107.8 (104.6, 111.1) 24 (10, 37) 849 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
Mississippi 2 105.0 (102.8, 107.2) 34 (21, 39) 1,822 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 0.2)
New Jersey 7 108.9 (107.7, 110.1) 14 (10, 21) 6,289 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.1)
Washington 1 102.0 (100.8, 103.3) 38 (34, 41) 4,922 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)
Maryland 2 103.8 (102.4, 105.3) 35 (30, 39) 3,915 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
North Carolina 2 109.1 (108.0, 110.3) 17 (13, 25) 6,932 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Vermont 2 113.9 (109.0, 119.0) 7 (3, 30) 408 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.3)
Alaska 2 96.0 (91.9, 100.1) 47 (37, 51) 434 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Idaho 7 100.7 (98.1, 103.4) 37 (29, 43) 1,123 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 0.5)
Kansas 2 109.6 (107.4, 111.9) 16 (9, 30) 1,877 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.3)
Colorado 2 94.9 (93.5, 96.3) 50 (44, 50) 3,531 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.4)
Nevada 2 91.2 (89.3, 93.1) 51 (50, 51) 1,771 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.5)
Texas 7 99.2 (98.6, 99.9) 40 (37, 43) 18,969 rising rising trend 0.2 (0.1, 0.4)
Wisconsin 2 107.6 (106.1, 109.2) 25 (15, 33) 3,651 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
Georgia 7 105.3 (104.2, 106.4) 28 (20, 34) 7,229 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.4)
Illinois 7 105.4 (104.4, 106.4) 26 (19, 33) 8,401 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.5)
Missouri 2 108.2 (106.6, 109.7) 21 (14, 31) 3,885 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 0.8)
Wyoming 2 99.6 (94.9, 104.4) 41 (24, 50) 338 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Alabama 2 106.3 (104.6, 107.9) 30 (19, 36) 3,141 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
California 7 95.7 (95.1, 96.2) 44 (42, 48) 24,342 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.3, 0.5)
Florida 2 113.7 (112.9, 114.6) 8 (5, 12) 14,319 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.2, 0.6)
Maine 2 114.8 (111.4, 118.2) 6 (3, 16) 878 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.6)
New Mexico 7 95.2 (92.8, 97.7) 46 (40, 50) 1,178 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
Ohio 2 112.8 (111.7, 114.0) 10 (6, 14) 7,736 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 0.7)
Oklahoma 2 106.8 (104.9, 108.7) 29 (17, 35) 2,514 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
Iowa 7 114.4 (112.2, 116.6) 3 (3, 10) 2,130 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 1.0)
Kentucky 7 121.8 (120.0, 123.7) 2 (1, 2) 3,326 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.5, 0.9)
Louisiana 7 110.6 (108.9, 112.4) 11 (5, 17) 3,092 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.5, 1.0)
Montana 2 108.4 (104.8, 112.2) 23 (8, 37) 671 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.1)
Utah 7 106.8 (104.8, 108.8) 20 (12, 33) 2,276 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
West Virginia 2 126.4 (123.3, 129.5) 1 (1, 2) 1,310 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 0.9)
Minnesota 2 115.5 (113.8, 117.1) 5 (3, 10) 3,908 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 1.1)
Nebraska 2 112.1 (109.4, 114.9) 12 (3, 23) 1,290 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.1)
South Dakota 2 110.3 (106.1, 114.5) 15 (4, 35) 546 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.2)
North Dakota 2 109.2 (104.8, 113.7) 19 (5, 37) 484 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.6, 1.6)
New York 7 114.1 (113.3, 115.0) 4 (3, 8) 14,037 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 1.6)
Connecticut 7 111.6 (109.6, 113.7) 9 (3, 16) 2,398 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 3.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 9:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top