Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for North Dakota by County
Childhood (Ages <15, All Sites) (All Stages^), 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes
Sorted by CI*Rank
Explanation of Column HeadersIncidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.
Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
Other Notes- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
Cass County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate : The incidence rate is 12.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 7.8 to 18.8 and 4 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend :
Adams County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Barnes County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Benson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Billings County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Bottineau County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Bowman County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Burke County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Burleigh County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Cavalier County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Dickey County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Divide County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Dunn County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Eddy County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Emmons County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Foster County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Golden Valley County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Grand Forks County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Grant County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Griggs County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Hettinger County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Kidder County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
LaMoure County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Logan County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
McHenry County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
McIntosh County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
McKenzie County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
McLean County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Mercer County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Morton County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Mountrail County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Nelson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Oliver County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Pembina County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Pierce County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Ramsey County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Ransom County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Renville County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Richland County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Rolette County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Sargent County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Sheridan County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Sioux County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Slope County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Stark County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Steele County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Stutsman County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Towner County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Traill County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Walsh County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Ward County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Wells County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Williams County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Notes:Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 3:03 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the
2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using
SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The
US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see
malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from
National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the
CI*Rank website.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the
2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
* Data has been
suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.