Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Quitman County 2 Rural 1,924.9 (1,680.7, 2,195.1) 1 (1, 24) 46 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 4.6)
Covington County 2 Rural 1,759.0 (1,618.5, 1,908.4) 2 (1, 25) 119 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.8, 2.5)
Issaquena County 2 Rural 1,749.1 (1,222.6, 2,423.6) 3 (1, 82) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-14.6, 16.6)
Coahoma County 2 Rural 1,703.2 (1,570.3, 1,844.5) 4 (1, 32) 128 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.9, 3.6)
Holmes County 2 Urban 1,660.7 (1,514.9, 1,816.8) 5 (1, 49) 99 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Tunica County 2 Urban 1,657.1 (1,444.5, 1,892.8) 6 (1, 68) 49 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.3, 0.4)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 1,652.3 (1,515.8, 1,798.0) 7 (1, 46) 110 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 1,641.4 (1,524.4, 1,765.1) 8 (1, 43) 148 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Smith County 2 Rural 1,615.1 (1,472.8, 1,767.4) 9 (1, 54) 97 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.4, 8.0)
Lee County 2 Rural 1,604.2 (1,537.8, 1,672.8) 10 (3, 30) 453 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Sharkey County 2 Rural 1,591.4 (1,314.0, 1,910.0) 11 (1, 82) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 1.9)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 1,585.4 (1,464.3, 1,714.0) 12 (2, 54) 130 stable stable trend -4.6 (-9.5, 0.7)
Yazoo County 2 Urban 1,581.1 (1,460.7, 1,708.7) 13 (2, 57) 132 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.3)
Simpson County 2 Urban 1,580.6 (1,470.9, 1,696.3) 14 (2, 51) 161 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.5)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 1,579.6 (1,472.9, 1,692.0) 15 (2, 52) 168 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.4, 2.8)
Forrest County 2 Urban 1,574.3 (1,502.2, 1,648.9) 16 (3, 39) 368 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Harrison County 2 Urban 1,558.5 (1,517.1, 1,600.7) 17 (8, 32) 1,127 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 0.3)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 1,557.1 (1,360.4, 1,774.3) 18 (1, 79) 47 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 8.1)
Pike County 2 Rural 1,548.7 (1,458.3, 1,643.3) 19 (4, 51) 228 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Yalobusha County 2 Rural 1,545.5 (1,396.3, 1,706.2) 20 (2, 68) 83 stable stable trend -6.7 (-11.4, 0.2)
Leflore County 2 Rural 1,539.1 (1,425.9, 1,659.1) 21 (3, 60) 143 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.2)
Grenada County 2 Rural 1,519.7 (1,402.3, 1,644.5) 22 (3, 64) 128 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Monroe County 2 Rural 1,513.7 (1,423.7, 1,607.9) 23 (6, 59) 216 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 1,503.7 (1,361.7, 1,656.6) 24 (3, 74) 84 stable stable trend -1.3 (-8.5, 0.4)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 1,503.0 (1,303.5, 1,724.5) 25 (2, 81) 43 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 3.1)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 1,500.4 (1,345.0, 1,668.9) 26 (2, 76) 71 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Marion County 2 Rural 1,500.2 (1,391.4, 1,615.2) 27 (5, 66) 146 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
Perry County 2 Urban 1,486.2 (1,331.5, 1,654.2) 28 (3, 79) 70 falling falling trend -6.9 (-10.6, -3.3)
Jackson County 2 Urban 1,484.4 (1,437.0, 1,532.9) 29 (16, 51) 780 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Marshall County 2 Urban 1,483.7 (1,391.6, 1,580.3) 30 (9, 67) 203 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.6)
Stone County 2 Urban 1,481.5 (1,349.0, 1,623.5) 31 (4, 75) 100 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Tate County 2 Urban 1,480.6 (1,374.7, 1,592.6) 32 (6, 69) 152 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.3, 0.8)
Union County 2 Rural 1,479.2 (1,373.0, 1,591.5) 33 (6, 69) 147 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.8)
Clay County 2 Rural 1,477.6 (1,355.6, 1,607.8) 34 (5, 73) 113 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Panola County 2 Rural 1,477.0 (1,381.2, 1,577.8) 35 (8, 66) 184 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Madison County 2 Urban 1,473.6 (1,416.1, 1,532.8) 36 (14, 56) 529 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Attala County 2 Rural 1,466.4 (1,342.3, 1,599.0) 37 (6, 77) 105 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.5)
Hinds County 2 Urban 1,464.8 (1,425.7, 1,504.6) 38 (20, 53) 1,123 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Washington County 2 Rural 1,463.4 (1,380.3, 1,550.3) 39 (11, 65) 247 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 0.5)
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 1,462.0 (1,307.8, 1,629.5) 40 (3, 80) 67 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.2)
Webster County 2 Rural 1,461.4 (1,295.4, 1,642.8) 41 (3, 81) 58 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.2, 8.3)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 1,461.0 (1,390.5, 1,534.1) 42 (14, 61) 335 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Jones County 2 Rural 1,449.7 (1,382.5, 1,519.4) 43 (17, 64) 361 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 0.9)
Jasper County 2 Rural 1,438.3 (1,312.9, 1,572.5) 44 (7, 79) 101 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 1,436.9 (1,280.1, 1,607.6) 45 (5, 81) 64 stable stable trend -6.7 (-14.5, 1.0)
Wilkinson County 2 Rural 1,436.5 (1,259.6, 1,631.7) 46 (3, 82) 50 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 1,421.4 (1,349.0, 1,496.6) 47 (19, 70) 300 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 4.0)
Lamar County 2 Urban 1,419.0 (1,345.6, 1,495.3) 48 (19, 71) 290 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Sunflower County 2 Rural 1,418.3 (1,305.7, 1,538.2) 49 (10, 78) 123 stable stable trend -8.2 (-14.9, 0.1)
Hancock County 2 Urban 1,411.9 (1,338.6, 1,488.3) 50 (22, 72) 292 falling falling trend -4.2 (-9.6, -0.3)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 1,407.6 (1,302.0, 1,519.6) 51 (12, 79) 133 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Clarke County 2 Rural 1,395.6 (1,272.2, 1,527.9) 52 (10, 81) 97 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Scott County 2 Urban 1,392.7 (1,287.1, 1,504.7) 53 (15, 80) 133 falling falling trend -1.4 (-5.9, -0.3)
Tippah County 2 Rural 1,390.4 (1,277.5, 1,510.7) 54 (12, 81) 114 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
George County 2 Rural 1,384.0 (1,266.6, 1,509.4) 55 (15, 81) 112 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.5)
Copiah County 2 Urban 1,378.6 (1,280.3, 1,482.5) 56 (17, 80) 153 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural 1,376.8 (1,237.1, 1,528.2) 57 (10, 82) 74 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
DeSoto County 2 Urban 1,376.7 (1,332.6, 1,421.9) 58 (39, 70) 777 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.7, -0.4)
Walthall County 2 Rural 1,373.8 (1,241.5, 1,516.6) 59 (12, 82) 81 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.5)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 1,337.7 (1,248.9, 1,431.2) 60 (29, 81) 176 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Winston County 2 Rural 1,333.5 (1,217.9, 1,457.1) 61 (23, 82) 102 falling falling trend -1.0 (-3.3, -0.3)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 1,333.0 (1,236.3, 1,435.3) 62 (25, 82) 148 falling falling trend -9.5 (-14.8, -3.9)
Wayne County 2 Rural 1,333.0 (1,216.9, 1,457.3) 63 (24, 82) 100 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Adams County 2 Rural 1,327.5 (1,236.8, 1,423.1) 64 (32, 82) 170 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.0, 0.1)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 1,327.2 (1,226.9, 1,433.6) 65 (27, 82) 134 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Newton County 2 Rural 1,322.3 (1,208.6, 1,443.9) 66 (26, 82) 102 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Benton County 2 Urban 1,317.9 (1,143.5, 1,511.7) 67 (9, 82) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.5)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 1,317.1 (1,231.7, 1,406.9) 68 (35, 82) 181 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Franklin County 2 Rural 1,311.5 (1,141.0, 1,500.6) 69 (12, 82) 44 falling falling trend -4.1 (-12.0, -0.2)
Carroll County 2 Rural 1,309.0 (1,165.5, 1,465.6) 70 (18, 82) 63 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.6)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 1,296.1 (1,215.5, 1,380.7) 71 (44, 82) 204 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Amite County 2 Rural 1,293.2 (1,168.0, 1,428.3) 72 (24, 82) 84 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 1,289.8 (1,202.7, 1,381.6) 73 (41, 82) 168 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Greene County 2 Rural 1,287.8 (1,145.4, 1,443.2) 74 (22, 82) 61 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Rankin County 2 Urban 1,281.9 (1,239.4, 1,325.6) 75 (57, 82) 703 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.9, -0.7)
Warren County 2 Rural 1,277.6 (1,201.0, 1,358.0) 76 (50, 82) 219 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Kemper County 2 Rural 1,275.8 (1,116.1, 1,451.9) 77 (19, 82) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Leake County 2 Rural 1,270.3 (1,160.8, 1,387.5) 78 (36, 82) 103 falling falling trend -6.7 (-12.6, -1.0)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 1,259.8 (1,200.8, 1,320.9) 79 (57, 82) 353 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 1,258.0 (1,100.7, 1,431.8) 80 (21, 82) 47 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.4, 3.8)
Noxubee County 2 Rural 1,233.9 (1,080.7, 1,403.1) 81 (27, 82) 49 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.2)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 1,219.4 (1,050.5, 1,408.3) 82 (26, 82) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 6:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top