Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 1,377.1 (1,368.2, 1,386.1) N/A 18,852 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,350.7 (1,349.8, 1,351.7) N/A 1,608,177 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Adair County 2 Rural 1,227.1 (1,111.9, 1,351.1) 66 (27, 76) 86 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Alfalfa County 2 Rural 1,372.0 (1,165.2, 1,604.9) 40 (1, 76) 32 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Atoka County 2 Rural 1,267.5 (1,136.3, 1,409.9) 62 (16, 76) 70 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Beaver County 2 Rural 1,177.1 (978.7, 1,404.6) 71 (7, 77) 25 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.8, 7.3)
Beckham County 2 Rural 1,299.1 (1,182.5, 1,424.1) 56 (14, 74) 95 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Blaine County 2 Rural 1,471.7 (1,298.2, 1,662.1) 18 (1, 69) 54 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Bryan County 2 Rural 1,356.2 (1,278.1, 1,438.0) 44 (15, 66) 230 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.7, 6.0)
Caddo County 2 Rural 1,550.2 (1,437.2, 1,669.7) 6 (1, 40) 142 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Canadian County 2 Urban 1,301.5 (1,254.6, 1,349.8) 55 (35, 68) 607 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Carter County 2 Rural 1,312.6 (1,237.0, 1,391.6) 52 (22, 70) 232 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 1,434.5 (1,353.9, 1,518.6) 22 (6, 55) 246 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 1,375.6 (1,245.2, 1,516.1) 39 (5, 71) 85 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.2, -1.0)
Cimarron County 2 Rural 867.0 (621.1, 1,178.0) 77 (50, 77) 9 stable stable trend 27.7 (-0.3, 60.1)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 1,292.5 (1,259.2, 1,326.5) 57 (42, 67) 1,179 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Coal County 2 Rural 1,323.4 (1,117.9, 1,556.4) 51 (1, 76) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Comanche County 2 Urban 1,392.8 (1,337.7, 1,449.6) 33 (14, 55) 500 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Cotton County 2 Urban 1,286.2 (1,089.0, 1,508.9) 60 (2, 77) 31 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Craig County 2 Rural 1,420.4 (1,286.0, 1,565.1) 27 (2, 67) 84 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Creek County 2 Urban 1,487.9 (1,424.1, 1,553.9) 12 (3, 36) 421 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Custer County 2 Rural 1,264.6 (1,160.0, 1,376.1) 63 (23, 75) 111 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Delaware County 2 Rural 1,263.6 (1,194.0, 1,336.3) 64 (37, 72) 261 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Dewey County 2 Rural 1,442.7 (1,196.8, 1,724.1) 21 (1, 75) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 1.8)
Ellis County 2 Rural 1,204.7 (980.3, 1,466.0) 69 (5, 77) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.2)
Garfield County 2 Urban 1,384.6 (1,314.8, 1,457.2) 35 (12, 61) 304 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Garvin County 2 Rural 1,424.5 (1,318.7, 1,536.5) 26 (3, 63) 139 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Grady County 2 Urban 1,344.2 (1,272.6, 1,418.9) 48 (18, 67) 275 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Grant County 2 Rural 1,290.2 (1,062.8, 1,551.8) 59 (1, 77) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Greer County 2 Rural 1,284.1 (1,072.2, 1,525.5) 61 (2, 77) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Harmon County 2 Rural 1,064.8 (805.0, 1,382.6) 76 (8, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.2)
Harper County 2 Rural 1,522.9 (1,240.2, 1,851.6) 8 (1, 75) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Haskell County 2 Rural 1,365.9 (1,220.2, 1,524.4) 42 (3, 73) 67 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Hughes County 2 Rural 1,305.5 (1,168.1, 1,454.7) 53 (9, 75) 67 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Jackson County 2 Rural 1,215.2 (1,109.9, 1,327.9) 67 (34, 76) 100 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.7, -0.9)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 1,480.8 (1,263.8, 1,724.7) 14 (1, 72) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Johnston County 2 Rural 1,337.0 (1,180.5, 1,508.8) 49 (4, 75) 54 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Kay County 2 Rural 1,420.0 (1,340.9, 1,502.5) 28 (6, 56) 249 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 3.3)
Kingfisher County 2 Rural 1,354.8 (1,217.8, 1,503.0) 45 (5, 74) 74 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Kiowa County 2 Rural 1,393.3 (1,224.0, 1,579.6) 32 (1, 74) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Latimer County 2 Rural 1,547.8 (1,380.3, 1,730.0) 7 (1, 62) 64 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.8)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 1,302.1 (1,228.2, 1,379.3) 54 (25, 71) 240 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 1,471.7 (1,381.2, 1,566.6) 19 (3, 51) 204 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 3.8)
Logan County 2 Urban 1,290.7 (1,216.2, 1,368.6) 58 (26, 71) 237 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
Love County 2 Rural 1,154.4 (1,008.5, 1,315.9) 72 (27, 77) 46 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Major County 2 Rural 1,144.4 (982.3, 1,325.8) 74 (25, 77) 37 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5)
Marshall County 2 Rural 1,410.0 (1,286.5, 1,542.3) 30 (3, 68) 100 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Mayes County 2 Rural 1,584.7 (1,495.6, 1,677.8) 3 (1, 25) 246 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.3, 6.5)
McClain County 2 Urban 1,417.7 (1,329.9, 1,509.7) 29 (5, 60) 204 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 1,456.5 (1,359.2, 1,559.1) 20 (2, 55) 171 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 1,376.0 (1,271.7, 1,486.8) 38 (7, 68) 135 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.2, 8.9)
Murray County 2 Rural 1,178.5 (1,055.7, 1,311.9) 70 (36, 77) 70 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 1,475.8 (1,407.3, 1,546.7) 17 (4, 41) 360 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Noble County 2 Rural 1,394.2 (1,244.2, 1,557.1) 31 (2, 72) 65 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Nowata County 2 Rural 1,518.1 (1,350.4, 1,701.1) 9 (1, 63) 61 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Okfuskee County 2 Rural 1,619.9 (1,456.1, 1,797.2) 1 (1, 41) 73 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 1,344.6 (1,323.6, 1,365.7) 47 (34, 56) 3,291 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 1,616.9 (1,523.9, 1,714.0) 2 (1, 18) 233 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.3)
Osage County 2 Urban 1,377.5 (1,304.5, 1,453.5) 37 (13, 63) 277 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 1,561.0 (1,459.9, 1,667.4) 5 (1, 34) 182 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 7.6)
Pawnee County 2 Urban 1,578.9 (1,443.9, 1,723.3) 4 (1, 40) 104 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Payne County 2 Rural 1,477.4 (1,405.2, 1,552.4) 16 (4, 41) 323 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 1,383.1 (1,306.2, 1,463.3) 36 (10, 61) 250 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 1,368.2 (1,281.5, 1,459.3) 41 (11, 66) 190 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 1,484.7 (1,417.8, 1,554.0) 13 (3, 37) 382 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Pushmataha County 2 Rural 1,424.9 (1,279.8, 1,582.1) 25 (1, 68) 73 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.5, 14.6)
Roger Mills County 2 Rural 1,392.3 (1,128.2, 1,699.3) 34 (1, 76) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Rogers County 2 Urban 1,362.8 (1,307.8, 1,419.6) 43 (20, 61) 477 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Seminole County 2 Rural 1,479.4 (1,369.6, 1,595.8) 15 (1, 54) 138 rising rising trend 7.4 (1.2, 11.1)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 1,493.7 (1,408.0, 1,583.2) 11 (2, 44) 233 stable stable trend -3.0 (-10.8, 2.2)
Stephens County 2 Rural 1,434.5 (1,356.6, 1,515.7) 23 (5, 56) 264 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Texas County 2 Rural 1,099.4 (978.8, 1,230.7) 75 (53, 77) 64 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Tillman County 2 Rural 1,146.1 (979.1, 1,333.6) 73 (23, 77) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 1,426.4 (1,403.5, 1,449.6) 24 (16, 38) 3,055 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 1.0)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 1,325.8 (1,266.8, 1,386.7) 50 (27, 66) 396 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Washington County 2 Rural 1,346.6 (1,276.9, 1,419.1) 46 (18, 65) 289 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Washita County 2 Rural 1,259.6 (1,111.7, 1,421.7) 65 (10, 76) 55 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 8.4)
Woods County 2 Rural 1,496.0 (1,305.3, 1,706.7) 10 (1, 70) 46 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Woodward County 2 Rural 1,211.5 (1,098.6, 1,332.8) 68 (31, 76) 86 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 8.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 10:00 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top