Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 2 N/A 1,443.3 (1,433.2, 1,453.4) N/A 16,055 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,350.7 (1,349.8, 1,351.7) N/A 1,608,177 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Woodruff County 2 Rural 1,363.1 (1,177.9, 1,569.4) 56 (5, 75) 41 stable stable trend -10.1 (-20.6, 0.8)
Sharp County 2 Rural 1,485.3 (1,371.8, 1,605.8) 31 (7, 64) 134 stable stable trend -7.0 (-13.5, 0.5)
Carroll County 2 Rural 1,335.1 (1,247.1, 1,427.8) 61 (32, 72) 182 falling falling trend -6.8 (-10.3, -3.4)
Hot Spring County 2 Rural 1,501.7 (1,409.4, 1,598.6) 24 (7, 57) 204 falling falling trend -6.6 (-10.0, -2.6)
Polk County 2 Rural 1,346.8 (1,240.2, 1,460.3) 59 (21, 72) 123 falling falling trend -6.3 (-11.4, -0.5)
Grant County 2 Urban 1,486.7 (1,362.0, 1,619.9) 28 (6, 63) 107 falling falling trend -6.2 (-11.9, -0.4)
Newton County 2 Rural 1,328.0 (1,167.3, 1,505.3) 63 (11, 74) 52 falling falling trend -6.2 (-11.9, -2.3)
Crittenden County 2 Urban 1,431.6 (1,348.3, 1,518.8) 43 (14, 64) 230 falling falling trend -4.7 (-10.1, -0.4)
Lonoke County 2 Urban 1,520.6 (1,449.8, 1,593.9) 20 (9, 49) 360 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.9, -0.2)
Washington County 2 Urban 1,247.8 (1,209.4, 1,287.1) 68 (60, 73) 828 falling falling trend -3.5 (-7.9, -1.2)
Benton County 2 Urban 1,337.0 (1,302.0, 1,372.6) 60 (49, 66) 1,137 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.4, -0.3)
Greene County 2 Rural 1,478.9 (1,395.6, 1,565.8) 35 (10, 59) 240 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.3, 0.6)
Howard County 2 Rural 1,203.1 (1,069.2, 1,349.3) 73 (42, 75) 60 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Sevier County 2 Rural 1,039.8 (916.4, 1,175.2) 75 (67, 75) 53 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.2)
Hempstead County 2 Rural 1,168.9 (1,063.4, 1,282.1) 74 (56, 75) 93 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Miller County 2 Urban 1,211.8 (1,135.0, 1,292.5) 71 (58, 75) 190 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Baxter County 2 Rural 1,443.4 (1,374.9, 1,514.4) 41 (16, 60) 361 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Izard County 2 Rural 1,271.7 (1,154.6, 1,397.5) 66 (32, 75) 89 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Little River County 2 Urban 1,220.8 (1,089.8, 1,363.5) 70 (41, 75) 65 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Marion County 2 Rural 1,294.1 (1,191.9, 1,403.0) 65 (34, 74) 128 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Jackson County 2 Rural 1,394.8 (1,267.5, 1,531.6) 52 (12, 72) 91 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Columbia County 2 Rural 1,252.7 (1,145.9, 1,366.8) 67 (40, 75) 104 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Perry County 2 Urban 1,378.5 (1,226.1, 1,544.7) 55 (9, 74) 61 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Yell County 2 Rural 1,403.3 (1,286.7, 1,527.7) 49 (11, 71) 110 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 1,361.7 (1,184.0, 1,558.8) 57 (6, 75) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Madison County 2 Urban 1,237.4 (1,122.6, 1,360.9) 69 (39, 75) 88 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Monroe County 2 Rural 1,541.0 (1,353.3, 1,747.8) 17 (1, 68) 51 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Saline County 2 Urban 1,409.5 (1,361.2, 1,459.1) 47 (28, 61) 662 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
White County 2 Rural 1,503.4 (1,439.1, 1,570.0) 23 (11, 50) 419 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Independence County 2 Rural 1,385.4 (1,299.5, 1,475.6) 53 (20, 68) 198 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 1,209.5 (1,071.6, 1,360.5) 72 (35, 75) 58 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Pulaski County 2 Urban 1,480.6 (1,451.3, 1,510.3) 33 (18, 45) 2,032 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.1)
Boone County 2 Rural 1,423.9 (1,341.8, 1,509.8) 45 (15, 64) 231 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.0)
Pike County 2 Rural 1,419.3 (1,263.7, 1,588.9) 46 (6, 73) 62 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Pope County 2 Rural 1,480.2 (1,408.8, 1,554.4) 34 (12, 57) 329 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Stone County 2 Rural 1,353.9 (1,228.4, 1,488.9) 58 (16, 74) 92 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Fulton County 2 Rural 1,401.0 (1,270.4, 1,541.5) 50 (8, 72) 89 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Garland County 2 Urban 1,454.8 (1,405.9, 1,505.0) 38 (18, 55) 700 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 1.2)
Faulkner County 2 Urban 1,486.0 (1,430.1, 1,543.5) 29 (12, 51) 550 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Nevada County 2 Rural 1,329.8 (1,166.9, 1,509.2) 62 (11, 75) 49 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Prairie County 2 Rural 1,380.9 (1,221.5, 1,555.5) 54 (9, 74) 56 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Ashley County 2 Rural 1,324.1 (1,215.0, 1,440.4) 64 (25, 74) 111 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 1,544.3 (1,449.4, 1,643.9) 15 (6, 51) 207 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Sebastian County 2 Urban 1,407.4 (1,358.6, 1,457.4) 48 (28, 61) 649 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9)
Craighead County 2 Urban 1,514.3 (1,455.2, 1,575.3) 21 (10, 47) 507 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 1.7)
Ouachita County 2 Rural 1,540.1 (1,429.9, 1,656.7) 18 (4, 55) 153 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Union County 2 Rural 1,521.8 (1,434.9, 1,612.7) 19 (7, 54) 237 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Conway County 2 Rural 1,497.3 (1,383.5, 1,618.2) 26 (6, 63) 131 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Franklin County 2 Rural 1,492.8 (1,366.9, 1,627.2) 27 (5, 64) 107 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Johnson County 2 Rural 1,443.9 (1,336.9, 1,557.3) 39 (10, 67) 139 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Cross County 2 Rural 1,485.7 (1,354.5, 1,626.1) 30 (5, 66) 97 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 1,462.3 (1,303.9, 1,634.5) 37 (4, 70) 63 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.8)
Randolph County 2 Rural 1,614.4 (1,485.6, 1,751.4) 10 (2, 47) 119 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.3)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 1,715.5 (1,643.5, 1,789.9) 5 (1, 13) 447 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.4)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 1,542.8 (1,448.8, 1,641.3) 16 (6, 51) 211 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.6)
Crawford County 2 Urban 1,510.7 (1,439.3, 1,584.9) 22 (9, 51) 345 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.5, 1.4)
Phillips County 2 Rural 1,482.6 (1,353.5, 1,620.8) 32 (5, 65) 102 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 1.8)
Searcy County 2 Rural 1,544.7 (1,374.8, 1,730.0) 14 (1, 66) 63 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.8)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 1,497.7 (1,379.6, 1,623.3) 25 (5, 62) 126 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Drew County 2 Rural 1,683.9 (1,545.1, 1,832.0) 7 (1, 38) 111 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.8)
St. Francis County 2 Rural 1,400.3 (1,288.0, 1,519.9) 51 (13, 70) 120 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.5)
Arkansas County 2 Rural 1,746.1 (1,608.9, 1,891.8) 3 (1, 22) 124 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.1)
Bradley County 2 Rural 1,443.1 (1,283.1, 1,617.6) 42 (6, 73) 60 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.0)
Clay County 2 Rural 1,578.1 (1,443.7, 1,721.8) 12 (2, 57) 103 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.1)
Dallas County 2 Rural 1,705.1 (1,499.6, 1,930.9) 6 (1, 54) 53 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.5)
Poinsett County 2 Urban 1,786.9 (1,663.9, 1,916.7) 2 (1, 14) 161 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.1)
Chicot County 2 Rural 1,425.2 (1,272.0, 1,591.9) 44 (6, 72) 66 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 2.6)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 1,717.2 (1,519.9, 1,933.1) 4 (1, 49) 57 stable stable trend 1.4 (0.0, 2.8)
Desha County 2 Rural 1,664.4 (1,497.3, 1,845.4) 9 (1, 52) 76 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.1)
Clark County 2 Rural 1,665.7 (1,534.0, 1,805.7) 8 (1, 39) 122 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.9)
Lee County 2 Rural 1,443.5 (1,270.9, 1,633.1) 40 (3, 72) 52 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 3.0)
Scott County 2 Rural 1,559.3 (1,393.8, 1,739.1) 13 (1, 65) 67 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.3, 2.8)
Logan County 2 Rural 1,609.2 (1,494.5, 1,730.5) 11 (2, 45) 149 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.5, 8.0)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 1,475.9 (1,254.8, 1,725.0) 36 (1, 74) 33 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 4.7)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 1,805.7 (1,662.7, 1,957.9) 1 (1, 15) 120 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.9, 7.8)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 3:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top