Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon 2 N/A 1,264.8 (1,256.9, 1,272.8) N/A 20,308 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,350.7 (1,349.8, 1,351.7) N/A 1,608,177 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Lane County 2 Urban 922.5 (900.7, 944.7) 34 (31, 35) 1,430 falling falling trend -14.3 (-16.4, -12.0)
Wasco County 2 Rural 1,199.8 (1,109.5, 1,295.5) 21 (8, 30) 138 falling falling trend -11.0 (-20.0, -2.0)
Hood River County 2 Rural 1,239.0 (1,135.1, 1,349.8) 18 (5, 29) 109 falling falling trend -8.4 (-12.8, -4.9)
Union County 2 Rural 1,103.5 (1,015.3, 1,197.5) 29 (18, 32) 122 falling falling trend -5.6 (-11.2, -1.8)
Gilliam County 2 Rural 672.8 (460.8, 949.2) 36 (29, 36) 7 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.4, -0.6)
Wallowa County 2 Rural 1,149.0 (1,001.5, 1,312.8) 26 (5, 33) 48 falling falling trend -2.6 (-9.4, -0.4)
Baker County 2 Rural 863.5 (774.0, 960.6) 35 (31, 36) 74 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.6)
Benton County 2 Urban 982.1 (933.8, 1,032.4) 32 (28, 34) 326 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Harney County 2 Rural 1,127.3 (972.6, 1,299.6) 28 (6, 34) 42 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Jackson County 2 Urban 1,333.1 (1,300.3, 1,366.5) 7 (5, 14) 1,325 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.5)
Coos County 2 Rural 1,253.2 (1,198.8, 1,309.6) 16 (8, 24) 432 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Curry County 2 Rural 1,127.6 (1,049.3, 1,210.2) 27 (17, 31) 176 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Malheur County 2 Rural 1,008.6 (925.7, 1,097.0) 31 (26, 35) 112 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Lake County 2 Rural 1,178.4 (1,030.2, 1,342.3) 24 (3, 32) 49 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Douglas County 2 Rural 1,159.0 (1,118.0, 1,201.1) 25 (18, 29) 651 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 1,185.9 (1,126.9, 1,247.3) 22 (14, 29) 346 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Grant County 2 Rural 1,020.1 (883.4, 1,172.7) 30 (18, 35) 44 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Deschutes County 2 Urban 1,280.1 (1,244.7, 1,316.2) 13 (8, 21) 1,058 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Morrow County 2 Rural 1,246.2 (1,095.2, 1,412.5) 17 (1, 31) 52 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Umatilla County 2 Rural 1,180.6 (1,123.0, 1,240.5) 23 (15, 29) 323 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Polk County 2 Urban 1,297.5 (1,242.1, 1,354.8) 11 (5, 21) 427 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Linn County 2 Urban 1,272.0 (1,227.7, 1,317.6) 14 (8, 22) 648 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Yamhill County 2 Urban 1,298.2 (1,248.2, 1,349.7) 10 (6, 20) 525 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Klamath County 2 Rural 1,333.1 (1,273.7, 1,394.5) 8 (3, 19) 407 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Sherman County 2 Rural 962.9 (689.4, 1,308.7) 33 (2, 36) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.8)
Clackamas County 2 Urban 1,321.0 (1,296.0, 1,346.4) 9 (6, 15) 2,202 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.1)
Josephine County 2 Urban 1,414.1 (1,364.5, 1,465.1) 3 (1, 8) 655 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Marion County 2 Urban 1,378.4 (1,348.2, 1,409.2) 6 (2, 9) 1,629 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Washington County 2 Urban 1,259.8 (1,236.5, 1,283.3) 15 (11, 21) 2,320 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Multnomah County 2 Urban 1,409.2 (1,387.8, 1,430.8) 4 (1, 7) 3,497 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.1)
Tillamook County 2 Rural 1,285.3 (1,198.9, 1,376.4) 12 (3, 25) 182 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Wheeler County 2 Rural 1,210.0 (887.5, 1,612.0) 20 (1, 36) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.3)
Columbia County 2 Urban 1,443.4 (1,371.6, 1,517.9) 2 (1, 8) 320 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Clatsop County 2 Rural 1,445.3 (1,366.5, 1,527.5) 1 (1, 9) 277 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 1,218.3 (1,120.3, 1,322.7) 19 (6, 29) 122 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.3)
Crook County 2 Urban 1,394.0 (1,298.3, 1,495.1) 5 (1, 18) 171 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 6:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top