Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 2 N/A 1,382.3 (1,375.7, 1,389.0) N/A 34,719 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,350.7 (1,349.8, 1,351.7) N/A 1,608,177 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Stewart County 2 Urban 1,326.6 (1,196.1, 1,467.5) 81 (10, 94) 79 falling falling trend -10.6 (-19.4, -1.3)
Houston County 2 Rural 1,411.4 (1,239.6, 1,600.4) 47 (2, 94) 50 stable stable trend -8.2 (-17.4, 1.5)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 1,518.1 (1,410.4, 1,632.0) 10 (1, 76) 152 falling falling trend -6.2 (-10.5, -0.6)
Bradley County 2 Urban 1,255.9 (1,206.9, 1,306.4) 91 (73, 94) 507 falling falling trend -5.7 (-10.0, -0.7)
Coffee County 2 Rural 1,360.0 (1,291.0, 1,431.8) 69 (23, 91) 298 falling falling trend -5.6 (-10.9, -0.3)
Overton County 2 Rural 1,319.2 (1,216.4, 1,428.4) 83 (19, 94) 127 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.3, -3.5)
Carroll County 2 Rural 1,476.3 (1,379.6, 1,578.0) 25 (3, 79) 178 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.5, -0.6)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 1,415.5 (1,335.6, 1,498.9) 43 (9, 87) 240 falling falling trend -4.7 (-8.6, -2.5)
Benton County 2 Rural 1,497.2 (1,374.4, 1,628.0) 20 (1, 84) 115 stable stable trend -4.1 (-11.3, 0.7)
Robertson County 2 Urban 1,425.1 (1,357.6, 1,495.2) 38 (11, 82) 357 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.0, -0.7)
Chester County 2 Urban 1,442.5 (1,312.1, 1,582.4) 32 (3, 92) 92 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.1, 1.0)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 1,342.9 (1,296.4, 1,390.6) 76 (41, 89) 683 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.9, -0.5)
Moore County 2 Rural 1,086.2 (922.7, 1,270.4) 94 (58, 95) 32 falling falling trend -3.0 (-12.6, -0.5)
Meigs County 2 Rural 1,386.3 (1,250.3, 1,533.4) 55 (4, 93) 80 stable stable trend -2.4 (-8.6, 0.6)
Polk County 2 Urban 1,347.3 (1,233.4, 1,469.0) 73 (12, 94) 106 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.9, -0.8)
Rutherford County 2 Urban 1,371.9 (1,336.2, 1,408.3) 65 (37, 83) 1,210 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -0.7)
Unicoi County 2 Urban 1,292.2 (1,184.5, 1,407.0) 87 (26, 94) 110 stable stable trend -2.2 (-10.9, 0.8)
Washington County 2 Urban 1,355.8 (1,310.8, 1,401.9) 70 (35, 87) 708 stable stable trend -2.1 (-3.7, 0.2)
Franklin County 2 Rural 1,355.6 (1,279.6, 1,435.0) 71 (22, 92) 248 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.9)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 1,032.1 (959.6, 1,108.7) 95 (93, 95) 155 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.8, -0.3)
Morgan County 2 Urban 1,341.9 (1,232.5, 1,458.5) 77 (12, 93) 115 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.4, -0.9)
Fentress County 2 Rural 1,397.6 (1,286.7, 1,515.6) 52 (5, 93) 124 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.7, 0.1)
Giles County 2 Rural 1,258.0 (1,173.0, 1,347.7) 89 (46, 94) 168 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.8, 0.2)
Anderson County 2 Urban 1,399.6 (1,342.0, 1,459.0) 51 (18, 83) 459 falling falling trend -1.2 (-3.4, -0.5)
Jackson County 2 Rural 1,257.7 (1,127.6, 1,399.0) 90 (23, 95) 72 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Cheatham County 2 Urban 1,501.5 (1,409.9, 1,597.5) 18 (3, 73) 222 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.3, 0.1)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 1,361.2 (1,305.5, 1,418.8) 68 (33, 88) 497 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 1,402.3 (1,337.3, 1,469.6) 50 (16, 85) 362 falling falling trend -1.1 (-3.1, -0.1)
Fayette County 2 Urban 1,318.0 (1,245.7, 1,393.5) 85 (35, 93) 261 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.0)
Rhea County 2 Rural 1,563.5 (1,467.9, 1,663.7) 6 (1, 49) 207 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.5, 0.0)
Union County 2 Urban 1,507.7 (1,388.0, 1,635.1) 14 (2, 80) 123 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 0.3)
Blount County 2 Urban 1,430.5 (1,387.0, 1,475.0) 37 (17, 70) 844 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.3)
Knox County 2 Urban 1,375.5 (1,350.0, 1,401.3) 59 (41, 78) 2,293 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Scott County 2 Rural 1,364.9 (1,252.5, 1,484.9) 67 (9, 93) 112 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.0)
Bledsoe County 2 Rural 1,341.3 (1,216.4, 1,475.7) 79 (10, 94) 87 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.2)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 1,626.1 (1,502.2, 1,757.5) 4 (1, 38) 132 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Pickett County 2 Rural 1,244.8 (1,062.9, 1,449.3) 92 (6, 95) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Putnam County 2 Rural 1,373.5 (1,311.5, 1,437.7) 63 (20, 88) 380 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Shelby County 2 Urban 1,343.6 (1,324.4, 1,363.1) 75 (58, 83) 3,952 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Campbell County 2 Urban 1,507.4 (1,425.5, 1,592.8) 15 (3, 63) 260 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 0.4)
Davidson County 2 Urban 1,316.4 (1,293.5, 1,339.7) 86 (66, 89) 2,654 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 1.1)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 1,378.4 (1,265.9, 1,498.4) 58 (7, 93) 116 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 1,374.5 (1,346.7, 1,402.7) 62 (40, 79) 1,924 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Perry County 2 Rural 1,341.5 (1,177.3, 1,522.4) 78 (4, 94) 50 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Sevier County 2 Rural 1,474.3 (1,421.4, 1,528.7) 26 (8, 56) 618 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.1)
Sumner County 2 Urban 1,413.2 (1,373.5, 1,453.7) 45 (21, 73) 995 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.0)
Grainger County 2 Urban 1,411.8 (1,309.5, 1,520.0) 46 (7, 91) 150 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Roane County 2 Urban 1,410.6 (1,345.7, 1,477.9) 48 (15, 83) 368 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 1,393.7 (1,354.9, 1,433.4) 53 (28, 78) 1,001 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.1)
Loudon County 2 Urban 1,374.6 (1,313.5, 1,437.9) 61 (22, 87) 405 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Obion County 2 Rural 1,318.6 (1,230.9, 1,410.9) 84 (27, 94) 174 stable stable trend -0.2 (-10.5, 3.8)
Smith County 2 Urban 1,512.5 (1,388.9, 1,644.4) 12 (1, 84) 116 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 0.9)
White County 2 Rural 1,419.3 (1,322.8, 1,521.1) 39 (6, 88) 166 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Williamson County 2 Urban 1,337.1 (1,300.4, 1,374.6) 80 (47, 88) 1,062 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
Clay County 2 Rural 1,378.6 (1,212.9, 1,560.7) 57 (2, 94) 52 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 1,375.3 (1,309.0, 1,444.1) 60 (23, 89) 333 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Tipton County 2 Urban 1,507.3 (1,431.9, 1,585.8) 16 (3, 56) 318 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 0.8)
Warren County 2 Rural 1,467.2 (1,382.3, 1,555.9) 27 (5, 79) 231 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.4, 0.8)
Wilson County 2 Urban 1,369.9 (1,324.5, 1,416.4) 66 (31, 85) 720 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Carter County 2 Urban 1,267.5 (1,206.5, 1,330.8) 88 (61, 94) 332 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 0.6)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 1,450.1 (1,359.2, 1,545.5) 29 (5, 83) 198 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Hickman County 2 Urban 1,446.8 (1,339.9, 1,560.0) 31 (3, 87) 141 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Maury County 2 Urban 1,433.3 (1,377.8, 1,490.5) 35 (12, 73) 533 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 1,419.0 (1,352.3, 1,488.1) 40 (11, 83) 347 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Madison County 2 Urban 1,353.6 (1,300.3, 1,408.6) 72 (33, 89) 505 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Monroe County 2 Rural 1,439.4 (1,366.1, 1,515.8) 33 (9, 81) 302 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.7)
Wayne County 2 Rural 1,450.9 (1,324.4, 1,586.4) 28 (2, 91) 99 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.9, 2.5)
Henderson County 2 Rural 1,449.6 (1,351.0, 1,553.7) 30 (5, 86) 164 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 1,485.6 (1,372.4, 1,605.7) 22 (2, 84) 133 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.9, 1.4)
McMinn County 2 Rural 1,385.2 (1,317.1, 1,455.9) 56 (18, 88) 318 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Greene County 2 Rural 1,416.5 (1,357.4, 1,477.4) 42 (15, 80) 449 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Grundy County 2 Rural 1,418.4 (1,283.0, 1,564.4) 41 (3, 92) 83 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Hardin County 2 Rural 1,324.3 (1,235.2, 1,418.0) 82 (24, 93) 171 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Johnson County 2 Rural 1,236.8 (1,131.2, 1,349.8) 93 (41, 94) 105 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.2)
Marion County 2 Urban 1,546.5 (1,448.3, 1,649.5) 8 (1, 55) 194 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.7)
Marshall County 2 Rural 1,656.0 (1,554.9, 1,761.9) 2 (1, 21) 210 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
McNairy County 2 Rural 1,391.4 (1,293.6, 1,494.8) 54 (8, 91) 155 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.1)
Dickson County 2 Urban 1,577.6 (1,498.6, 1,659.8) 5 (1, 31) 313 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.3)
Bedford County 2 Rural 1,437.8 (1,355.8, 1,523.5) 34 (7, 83) 240 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.4)
Cannon County 2 Urban 1,498.1 (1,357.4, 1,649.4) 19 (1, 89) 85 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Cocke County 2 Rural 1,479.4 (1,395.0, 1,567.6) 24 (3, 73) 243 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.5)
Henry County 2 Rural 1,519.9 (1,432.9, 1,610.8) 9 (2, 63) 237 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.6)
Lewis County 2 Rural 1,481.7 (1,337.6, 1,637.2) 23 (1, 89) 81 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Hancock County 2 Rural 1,508.9 (1,311.2, 1,728.1) 13 (1, 93) 45 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 2.1)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 1,344.6 (1,159.9, 1,551.0) 74 (2, 94) 41 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.7)
Gibson County 2 Urban 1,512.7 (1,435.1, 1,593.4) 11 (3, 60) 291 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.6)
Sequatchie County 2 Urban 1,414.4 (1,290.7, 1,547.0) 44 (4, 92) 100 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.5)
Dyer County 2 Rural 1,432.8 (1,344.8, 1,525.2) 36 (6, 85) 202 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.7)
Macon County 2 Urban 1,646.2 (1,527.3, 1,772.0) 3 (1, 33) 148 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.2)
Decatur County 2 Rural 1,553.7 (1,407.3, 1,711.4) 7 (1, 81) 85 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.9)
Haywood County 2 Rural 1,496.6 (1,372.5, 1,629.0) 21 (1, 85) 113 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.5, 2.2)
Trousdale County 2 Urban 1,787.2 (1,584.7, 2,008.6) 1 (1, 30) 60 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.9)
Weakley County 2 Rural 1,410.6 (1,318.0, 1,508.0) 49 (7, 89) 177 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.5)
Lake County 2 Rural 1,372.7 (1,172.0, 1,598.2) 64 (1, 94) 34 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.6)
Crockett County 2 Urban 1,505.0 (1,362.6, 1,658.4) 17 (1, 87) 84 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.7, 2.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 9:40 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top