Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Aitkin County 2 Rural 2,294.3 (2,113.9, 2,486.0) 31 (4, 79) 121 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Anoka County 2 Urban 2,271.6 (2,212.3, 2,332.1) 39 (19, 60) 1,159 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.6)
Becker County 2 Rural 2,275.6 (2,121.3, 2,438.2) 35 (7, 77) 166 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 2,437.3 (2,278.6, 2,604.0) 9 (2, 57) 181 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.6)
Benton County 2 Urban 2,101.5 (1,931.0, 2,282.9) 70 (19, 86) 116 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Big Stone County 2 Rural 2,046.4 (1,712.4, 2,426.1) 78 (4, 87) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 2,129.7 (1,999.5, 2,266.2) 66 (23, 84) 205 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Brown County 2 Rural 2,321.7 (2,141.5, 2,512.9) 27 (3, 77) 126 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Carlton County 2 Urban 2,293.5 (2,127.7, 2,468.8) 32 (6, 77) 146 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Carver County 2 Urban 2,048.6 (1,939.2, 2,162.6) 77 (44, 86) 275 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.8)
Cass County 2 Rural 2,433.7 (2,277.0, 2,598.3) 11 (2, 58) 187 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 2,437.2 (2,176.8, 2,720.2) 10 (1, 77) 65 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.1)
Chisago County 2 Urban 2,354.4 (2,211.1, 2,504.6) 24 (4, 66) 208 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.7, 3.4)
Clay County 2 Urban 2,450.0 (2,303.3, 2,603.6) 8 (2, 52) 213 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Clearwater County 2 Rural 2,165.3 (1,863.1, 2,502.1) 62 (3, 87) 37 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Cook County 2 Rural 1,929.1 (1,628.4, 2,270.0) 84 (10, 87) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Cottonwood County 2 Rural 2,391.2 (2,128.1, 2,677.4) 16 (1, 81) 61 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.9)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 2,385.6 (2,276.2, 2,499.0) 19 (4, 52) 362 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Dakota County 2 Urban 2,187.1 (2,134.9, 2,240.2) 59 (35, 71) 1,383 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Dodge County 2 Urban 2,067.9 (1,843.4, 2,312.1) 74 (10, 87) 63 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 0.2)
Douglas County 2 Rural 2,257.0 (2,119.3, 2,401.3) 42 (9, 76) 202 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Faribault County 2 Rural 2,195.6 (1,968.2, 2,442.0) 56 (6, 86) 69 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.7)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 2,245.8 (2,050.7, 2,454.3) 47 (5, 82) 100 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 1,946.6 (1,801.5, 2,100.3) 83 (51, 87) 135 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 2,271.9 (2,135.1, 2,415.1) 38 (9, 75) 210 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Grant County 2 Rural 2,474.5 (2,115.5, 2,876.9) 7 (1, 84) 34 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.6)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 2,112.9 (2,082.4, 2,143.8) 69 (55, 76) 3,795 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
Houston County 2 Urban 2,042.9 (1,848.2, 2,252.7) 79 (20, 87) 83 stable stable trend -4.8 (-9.9, 0.1)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 2,530.9 (2,340.2, 2,733.1) 5 (1, 47) 134 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.0, 9.9)
Isanti County 2 Urban 2,414.2 (2,246.7, 2,590.9) 15 (2, 64) 158 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.5, 2.5)
Itasca County 2 Rural 2,113.9 (1,990.6, 2,242.9) 68 (28, 84) 226 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Jackson County 2 Rural 1,916.8 (1,664.8, 2,196.1) 85 (21, 87) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Kanabec County 2 Rural 2,425.0 (2,191.1, 2,677.4) 12 (1, 74) 81 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 9.8)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 2,302.8 (2,155.8, 2,457.2) 29 (6, 74) 188 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 2.5)
Kittson County 2 Rural 2,096.2 (1,715.9, 2,534.9) 71 (2, 87) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.2)
Koochiching County 2 Rural 2,014.1 (1,797.3, 2,250.0) 80 (14, 87) 64 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural 1,997.1 (1,709.1, 2,319.0) 81 (8, 87) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Lake County 2 Rural 2,248.7 (2,008.3, 2,509.9) 46 (4, 85) 65 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.7)
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural 2,421.0 (1,971.0, 2,943.3) 13 (1, 87) 21 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 13.0)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 2,327.5 (2,140.7, 2,526.2) 26 (3, 76) 117 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.4)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 2,330.4 (1,970.5, 2,736.0) 25 (1, 87) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Lyon County 2 Rural 2,266.3 (2,063.2, 2,484.0) 40 (4, 82) 94 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.1)
Mahnomen County 2 Rural 2,807.4 (2,342.3, 3,338.3) 1 (1, 73) 26 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 11.2)
Marshall County 2 Rural 2,379.5 (2,078.5, 2,711.3) 20 (1, 84) 46 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Martin County 2 Rural 2,206.8 (2,016.5, 2,410.1) 54 (6, 84) 102 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
McLeod County 2 Rural 2,189.4 (2,037.3, 2,349.8) 58 (11, 82) 155 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Meeker County 2 Rural 2,249.1 (2,058.1, 2,453.1) 45 (4, 82) 104 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 2,487.4 (2,289.2, 2,698.2) 6 (1, 57) 118 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Morrison County 2 Rural 2,069.8 (1,917.0, 2,231.5) 73 (26, 86) 139 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Mower County 2 Rural 2,203.4 (2,049.2, 2,366.1) 55 (12, 82) 157 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Murray County 2 Rural 2,237.3 (1,957.3, 2,546.0) 48 (2, 87) 47 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 2,054.2 (1,889.1, 2,229.9) 76 (26, 87) 117 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.6)
Nobles County 2 Rural 2,299.9 (2,078.8, 2,538.0) 30 (3, 82) 81 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Norman County 2 Rural 2,264.3 (1,913.3, 2,660.8) 41 (1, 87) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 2,255.1 (2,172.3, 2,340.2) 43 (16, 67) 571 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 4.2)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 2,357.9 (2,245.4, 2,474.6) 23 (6, 59) 337 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 5.7)
Pennington County 2 Rural 2,365.1 (2,103.3, 2,650.5) 21 (1, 83) 60 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Pine County 2 Rural 2,227.9 (2,059.4, 2,406.6) 50 (9, 82) 133 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Pipestone County 2 Rural 2,420.3 (2,112.7, 2,759.7) 14 (1, 83) 46 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Polk County 2 Urban 2,288.2 (2,112.6, 2,474.4) 33 (5, 78) 129 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.3)
Pope County 2 Rural 2,136.7 (1,894.2, 2,401.6) 64 (7, 87) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 2,234.0 (2,187.0, 2,281.8) 49 (28, 63) 1,779 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.9)
Red Lake County 2 Rural 2,272.3 (1,831.7, 2,786.4) 37 (1, 87) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 3.1)
Redwood County 2 Rural 2,390.2 (2,154.3, 2,644.8) 17 (1, 77) 76 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.3)
Renville County 2 Rural 2,387.5 (2,144.8, 2,649.9) 18 (1, 78) 72 rising rising trend 5.8 (0.7, 15.6)
Rice County 2 Rural 2,191.1 (2,063.9, 2,324.2) 57 (17, 80) 226 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Rock County 2 Urban 2,085.2 (1,800.5, 2,401.7) 72 (5, 87) 39 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Roseau County 2 Rural 1,955.6 (1,724.5, 2,208.9) 82 (24, 87) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Scott County 2 Urban 2,214.5 (2,112.8, 2,319.7) 53 (19, 74) 371 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 2,227.4 (2,100.5, 2,359.9) 51 (13, 78) 244 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
Sibley County 2 Rural 2,055.2 (1,821.3, 2,310.6) 75 (10, 87) 57 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 2,250.6 (2,183.6, 2,319.2) 44 (21, 64) 886 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Stearns County 2 Urban 2,128.2 (2,045.3, 2,213.6) 67 (38, 80) 507 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 3.7)
Steele County 2 Rural 2,130.8 (1,974.9, 2,295.8) 65 (16, 85) 142 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Stevens County 2 Rural 1,830.0 (1,543.7, 2,153.8) 87 (25, 87) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Swift County 2 Rural 2,176.7 (1,906.3, 2,474.3) 60 (3, 87) 48 rising rising trend 10.0 (0.1, 17.0)
Todd County 2 Rural 1,912.7 (1,751.7, 2,084.5) 86 (56, 87) 106 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Traverse County 2 Rural 2,677.6 (2,188.5, 3,241.5) 3 (1, 84) 22 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 4.6)
Wabasha County 2 Urban 2,142.8 (1,958.7, 2,339.5) 63 (12, 86) 101 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Wadena County 2 Rural 2,801.5 (2,530.8, 3,093.2) 2 (1, 18) 79 rising rising trend 12.0 (2.1, 22.8)
Waseca County 2 Rural 2,221.9 (1,998.9, 2,462.8) 52 (5, 85) 75 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Washington County 2 Urban 2,363.8 (2,296.2, 2,432.9) 22 (9, 43) 957 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.8, 2.9)
Watonwan County 2 Rural 2,286.9 (2,005.7, 2,596.0) 34 (2, 86) 49 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)
Wilkin County 2 Rural 2,531.1 (2,142.1, 2,970.2) 4 (1, 83) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.5)
Winona County 2 Rural 2,274.1 (2,132.4, 2,422.7) 36 (6, 75) 196 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Wright County 2 Urban 2,311.2 (2,211.0, 2,414.9) 28 (8, 63) 413 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.4)
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural 2,171.2 (1,880.7, 2,493.6) 61 (3, 87) 41 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 3:47 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top