Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 2 N/A 1,843.1 (1,830.0, 1,856.2) N/A 15,653 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 2,004.7 (2,002.9, 2,006.4) N/A 1,067,371 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.8)
Marion County 2 Rural 1,746.1 (1,600.9, 1,901.0) 47 (12, 66) 107 falling falling trend -6.6 (-10.7, -1.1)
Shelby County 2 Urban 1,658.9 (1,597.4, 1,722.1) 60 (40, 65) 572 falling falling trend -6.5 (-8.5, -3.9)
Dallas County 2 Rural 1,682.7 (1,549.9, 1,823.9) 55 (20, 67) 123 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.4)
Chambers County 2 Rural 1,760.7 (1,621.9, 1,908.4) 43 (10, 65) 121 falling falling trend -2.3 (-5.0, -1.0)
Tuscaloosa County 2 Urban 1,665.6 (1,599.7, 1,733.6) 58 (38, 65) 505 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.7, -1.7)
Cullman County 2 Rural 1,671.5 (1,583.0, 1,763.8) 57 (33, 66) 273 falling falling trend -2.2 (-6.6, -0.8)
Colbert County 2 Urban 1,740.1 (1,631.9, 1,853.5) 49 (18, 65) 196 falling falling trend -2.0 (-9.4, -0.3)
Escambia County 2 Rural 1,524.9 (1,395.9, 1,662.9) 65 (42, 67) 104 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Lauderdale County 2 Urban 1,678.8 (1,596.0, 1,764.7) 56 (33, 65) 313 falling falling trend -2.0 (-5.1, -1.3)
Coosa County 2 Rural 1,592.4 (1,377.0, 1,832.3) 63 (14, 67) 40 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.3)
Randolph County 2 Rural 1,772.9 (1,603.0, 1,956.1) 39 (6, 66) 81 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.8, 0.1)
Covington County 2 Rural 1,605.3 (1,483.5, 1,734.5) 62 (36, 67) 129 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.5)
Henry County 2 Urban 1,883.5 (1,694.6, 2,088.0) 23 (2, 63) 75 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Perry County 2 Rural 1,460.9 (1,217.4, 1,739.1) 67 (24, 67) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.5)
Marengo County 2 Rural 1,662.8 (1,483.8, 1,857.5) 59 (14, 67) 64 falling falling trend -1.1 (-4.4, -0.1)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 1,847.0 (1,809.9, 1,884.7) 27 (18, 41) 1,960 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Talladega County 2 Rural 1,836.4 (1,738.4, 1,938.6) 28 (9, 55) 273 falling falling trend -1.0 (-4.0, -0.3)
Houston County 2 Urban 1,909.9 (1,822.2, 2,000.9) 19 (6, 40) 363 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Morgan County 2 Urban 1,952.9 (1,868.9, 2,039.8) 15 (4, 34) 415 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 1,849.8 (1,754.2, 1,949.3) 26 (9, 52) 289 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Winston County 2 Rural 1,789.3 (1,628.3, 1,962.0) 36 (5, 64) 92 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Limestone County 2 Urban 1,767.1 (1,673.8, 1,864.2) 41 (18, 61) 278 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Blount County 2 Urban 1,725.4 (1,615.1, 1,841.4) 52 (20, 64) 186 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Marshall County 2 Rural 1,812.2 (1,719.8, 1,908.3) 31 (14, 56) 295 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Russell County 2 Urban 1,745.2 (1,620.1, 1,877.5) 48 (15, 65) 151 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.2)
Bibb County 2 Urban 1,713.8 (1,531.5, 1,912.1) 54 (9, 67) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 1,734.8 (1,630.2, 1,844.4) 50 (20, 64) 212 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Franklin County 2 Rural 1,886.6 (1,725.1, 2,059.2) 21 (3, 58) 102 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Geneva County 2 Urban 1,871.2 (1,709.4, 2,044.2) 25 (3, 61) 100 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Chilton County 2 Urban 1,747.5 (1,612.8, 1,890.6) 46 (13, 65) 129 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Hale County 2 Urban 1,761.9 (1,549.2, 1,995.8) 42 (4, 67) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Madison County 2 Urban 1,777.0 (1,728.1, 1,827.0) 38 (26, 53) 1,021 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 1,942.4 (1,786.9, 2,108.0) 17 (2, 53) 119 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Lee County 2 Urban 1,607.3 (1,530.2, 1,687.4) 61 (44, 67) 344 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Walker County 2 Urban 1,995.4 (1,884.5, 2,111.1) 10 (2, 34) 250 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Autauga County 2 Urban 1,877.2 (1,752.6, 2,008.3) 24 (5, 54) 172 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Barbour County 2 Rural 1,929.2 (1,758.1, 2,112.6) 18 (2, 56) 95 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 1,815.1 (1,600.7, 2,050.4) 30 (2, 66) 53 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Etowah County 2 Urban 1,979.4 (1,890.4, 2,071.4) 12 (3, 31) 385 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Fayette County 2 Rural 1,732.9 (1,540.9, 1,942.4) 51 (5, 67) 60 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Jackson County 2 Rural 1,784.1 (1,670.7, 1,903.4) 37 (13, 62) 189 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Wilcox County 2 Rural 1,798.5 (1,551.6, 2,074.0) 33 (2, 67) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Coffee County 2 Rural 1,769.1 (1,646.8, 1,898.1) 40 (12, 64) 159 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Elmore County 2 Urban 2,042.3 (1,934.7, 2,154.5) 6 (2, 27) 280 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Greene County 2 Urban 1,586.7 (1,331.7, 1,876.3) 64 (9, 67) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.7)
Lamar County 2 Rural 1,818.9 (1,609.2, 2,048.5) 29 (3, 66) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Baldwin County 2 Urban 2,024.3 (1,966.3, 2,083.6) 7 (3, 19) 954 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Clarke County 2 Rural 2,054.7 (1,874.9, 2,247.1) 5 (1, 40) 96 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Clay County 2 Rural 2,075.9 (1,848.4, 2,323.8) 4 (1, 49) 61 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Dale County 2 Rural 1,991.4 (1,857.8, 2,132.2) 11 (2, 40) 168 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 1,946.9 (1,880.5, 2,015.0) 16 (6, 32) 673 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Conecuh County 2 Rural 1,791.8 (1,573.8, 2,031.8) 35 (3, 67) 49 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Sumter County 2 Rural 1,517.4 (1,294.1, 1,768.3) 66 (20, 67) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 2.9)
Butler County 2 Rural 1,748.4 (1,565.2, 1,947.2) 44 (6, 67) 68 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.2)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 1,748.1 (1,540.0, 1,976.7) 45 (5, 67) 51 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.2)
Monroe County 2 Rural 1,721.0 (1,543.9, 1,913.1) 53 (9, 67) 70 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 2,133.2 (2,042.7, 2,226.6) 3 (1, 13) 432 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.1)
Mobile County 2 Urban 1,884.3 (1,837.5, 1,932.1) 22 (13, 36) 1,268 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 2.7)
Pickens County 2 Urban 2,001.2 (1,799.8, 2,219.2) 8 (1, 53) 73 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Tallapoosa County 2 Rural 1,996.8 (1,867.6, 2,132.6) 9 (2, 38) 183 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.3)
Macon County 2 Urban 1,793.7 (1,607.7, 1,995.6) 34 (5, 66) 70 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.5)
Pike County 2 Rural 1,957.9 (1,786.4, 2,141.5) 14 (2, 54) 97 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Bullock County 2 Rural 1,963.9 (1,679.3, 2,283.4) 13 (1, 65) 35 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.6)
Lowndes County 2 Urban 2,210.9 (1,925.8, 2,526.6) 2 (1, 44) 44 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.8)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 1,798.8 (1,645.1, 1,963.1) 32 (7, 65) 104 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.3, 9.8)
Crenshaw County 2 Rural 2,471.3 (2,198.6, 2,768.7) 1 (1, 10) 62 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.8, 8.7)
Washington County 2 Rural 1,909.5 (1,692.3, 2,147.0) 20 (2, 64) 57 stable stable trend 6.4 (-0.7, 12.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 2:34 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top