Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 2 N/A 2,109.2 (2,091.2, 2,127.3) N/A 10,722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 2,004.7 (2,002.9, 2,006.4) N/A 1,067,371 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.8)
Hot Spring County 2 Rural 2,160.5 (1,998.2, 2,332.7) 34 (7, 62) 135 falling falling trend -7.7 (-11.8, -2.9)
Polk County 2 Rural 1,953.3 (1,770.9, 2,149.5) 59 (17, 72) 86 falling falling trend -7.4 (-12.4, -1.5)
Lonoke County 2 Urban 2,261.7 (2,131.0, 2,398.5) 14 (5, 47) 231 stable stable trend -5.1 (-10.3, 0.6)
Washington County 2 Urban 1,864.4 (1,793.5, 1,937.5) 66 (52, 71) 537 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.4, -0.9)
Howard County 2 Rural 1,611.6 (1,387.6, 1,861.6) 74 (52, 75) 37 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Hempstead County 2 Rural 1,676.5 (1,492.1, 1,877.5) 71 (52, 75) 61 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Little River County 2 Urban 1,765.2 (1,540.0, 2,014.5) 70 (32, 75) 45 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Marion County 2 Rural 1,838.5 (1,669.4, 2,020.5) 68 (33, 74) 89 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Miller County 2 Urban 1,671.7 (1,538.6, 1,813.2) 72 (61, 75) 119 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Sevier County 2 Rural 1,601.5 (1,371.6, 1,859.2) 75 (53, 75) 36 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.3)
Baxter County 2 Rural 2,154.6 (2,042.4, 2,271.5) 35 (11, 56) 276 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Pike County 2 Rural 2,054.7 (1,783.1, 2,356.0) 45 (4, 74) 42 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.0, 0.7)
Izard County 2 Rural 1,878.6 (1,678.2, 2,096.3) 65 (21, 75) 64 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Columbia County 2 Rural 1,801.3 (1,615.8, 2,002.3) 69 (37, 75) 70 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Monroe County 2 Rural 2,179.8 (1,862.8, 2,535.5) 29 (1, 73) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
Jackson County 2 Rural 2,062.7 (1,835.2, 2,310.9) 43 (7, 72) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 1,654.0 (1,426.4, 1,907.8) 73 (45, 75) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Perry County 2 Urban 2,015.6 (1,745.0, 2,316.4) 51 (5, 74) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
White County 2 Rural 2,227.6 (2,111.3, 2,348.7) 18 (7, 48) 278 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Woodruff County 2 Rural 1,991.9 (1,679.0, 2,346.4) 56 (4, 75) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Yell County 2 Rural 2,000.4 (1,796.6, 2,220.9) 53 (11, 72) 71 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Boone County 2 Rural 2,118.8 (1,975.2, 2,270.2) 37 (11, 62) 163 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Grant County 2 Urban 2,015.9 (1,801.6, 2,249.0) 50 (10, 72) 65 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Madison County 2 Urban 1,853.0 (1,646.7, 2,078.2) 67 (25, 75) 60 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.4)
Garland County 2 Urban 2,115.0 (2,032.4, 2,200.1) 39 (17, 57) 500 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.8)
Independence County 2 Rural 2,014.4 (1,863.3, 2,174.5) 52 (16, 69) 133 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Pulaski County 2 Urban 2,172.7 (2,119.7, 2,226.8) 32 (15, 44) 1,328 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.2)
Sharp County 2 Rural 2,206.4 (2,014.3, 2,412.1) 24 (3, 63) 98 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Stone County 2 Rural 1,991.2 (1,783.2, 2,216.9) 57 (12, 73) 67 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 1,914.4 (1,617.8, 2,249.9) 61 (7, 75) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Saline County 2 Urban 2,085.9 (2,000.1, 2,174.4) 42 (21, 58) 455 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Craighead County 2 Urban 2,214.0 (2,107.2, 2,324.8) 21 (8, 47) 330 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.6, 2.2)
Fulton County 2 Rural 2,061.2 (1,842.5, 2,298.9) 44 (6, 71) 65 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Pope County 2 Rural 2,169.6 (2,041.5, 2,303.6) 33 (9, 57) 218 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Prairie County 2 Rural 1,904.5 (1,639.2, 2,200.6) 62 (9, 75) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Ashley County 2 Rural 2,000.0 (1,807.9, 2,207.0) 54 (13, 72) 80 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 2,247.5 (2,089.1, 2,414.7) 15 (4, 52) 150 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Faulkner County 2 Urban 2,174.1 (2,072.3, 2,279.7) 31 (11, 52) 351 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.1)
Carroll County 2 Rural 1,898.3 (1,749.8, 2,056.1) 63 (32, 73) 125 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Nevada County 2 Rural 1,953.2 (1,667.6, 2,273.8) 60 (7, 75) 34 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3)
Greene County 2 Rural 2,112.7 (1,966.0, 2,267.5) 40 (9, 63) 156 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Logan County 2 Rural 2,378.0 (2,173.4, 2,596.7) 10 (1, 46) 101 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Sebastian County 2 Urban 2,046.8 (1,959.3, 2,137.3) 47 (25, 62) 422 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.9)
Union County 2 Rural 2,224.2 (2,070.2, 2,386.8) 19 (5, 56) 159 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Benton County 2 Urban 2,020.5 (1,956.0, 2,086.7) 49 (34, 62) 758 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.2)
Johnson County 2 Rural 2,207.2 (2,010.8, 2,417.7) 23 (3, 61) 95 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 2,498.1 (2,158.5, 2,876.2) 3 (1, 58) 39 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.0)
Cross County 2 Rural 2,239.1 (2,003.0, 2,495.5) 17 (2, 64) 67 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.4)
Franklin County 2 Rural 2,117.7 (1,902.4, 2,350.9) 38 (5, 69) 71 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Ouachita County 2 Rural 2,197.1 (2,004.9, 2,402.8) 25 (3, 64) 100 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 2,208.7 (2,007.8, 2,424.4) 22 (3, 62) 90 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.0)
Chicot County 2 Rural 1,891.2 (1,636.7, 2,174.1) 64 (12, 75) 40 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Conway County 2 Rural 2,185.9 (1,983.8, 2,403.2) 27 (3, 64) 87 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Crittenden County 2 Urban 1,986.0 (1,837.3, 2,143.6) 58 (21, 70) 137 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.1)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 2,392.6 (2,266.8, 2,523.6) 8 (1, 30) 281 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.6)
Scott County 2 Rural 2,051.6 (1,782.0, 2,350.4) 46 (4, 73) 42 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.5)
Searcy County 2 Rural 2,239.6 (1,951.9, 2,558.0) 16 (1, 69) 44 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
Arkansas County 2 Rural 2,510.0 (2,271.1, 2,767.2) 2 (1, 36) 83 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.5)
Crawford County 2 Urban 2,185.6 (2,058.3, 2,318.7) 28 (8, 55) 225 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.7)
Poinsett County 2 Urban 2,454.5 (2,243.2, 2,680.6) 6 (1, 39) 101 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.7)
Bradley County 2 Rural 2,175.5 (1,890.1, 2,491.8) 30 (2, 71) 42 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.4)
Clay County 2 Rural 2,371.4 (2,135.0, 2,626.9) 11 (1, 54) 74 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.2)
Dallas County 2 Rural 2,411.4 (2,072.9, 2,789.4) 7 (1, 64) 37 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.6)
Drew County 2 Rural 2,487.7 (2,241.6, 2,753.4) 5 (1, 42) 75 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.5)
Newton County 2 Rural 2,021.4 (1,744.3, 2,330.5) 48 (5, 74) 39 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.6)
Randolph County 2 Rural 2,326.9 (2,105.8, 2,564.8) 13 (1, 54) 82 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.9)
St. Francis County 2 Rural 1,995.6 (1,797.4, 2,209.8) 55 (13, 72) 77 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.7)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 2,332.5 (2,034.0, 2,662.5) 12 (1, 65) 45 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.3)
Phillips County 2 Rural 2,141.3 (1,916.1, 2,385.8) 36 (3, 69) 68 stable stable trend 1.4 (0.0, 2.7)
Lee County 2 Rural 2,108.4 (1,809.7, 2,442.5) 41 (2, 74) 36 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.2)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 2,218.6 (1,822.9, 2,674.4) 20 (1, 74) 23 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 5.1)
Desha County 2 Rural 2,495.9 (2,197.9, 2,823.2) 4 (1, 51) 52 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.1, 3.5)
Clark County 2 Rural 2,387.8 (2,161.2, 2,631.9) 9 (1, 50) 82 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.3, 3.3)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 2,193.1 (2,024.4, 2,372.0) 26 (5, 61) 130 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.1, 8.3)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 2,703.1 (2,447.8, 2,978.0) 1 (1, 16) 82 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.8, 8.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 9:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top