Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon 2 N/A 1,903.4 (1,889.1, 1,917.7) N/A 14,163 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 2,004.7 (2,002.9, 2,006.4) N/A 1,067,371 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.8)
Lane County 2 Urban 1,380.9 (1,342.6, 1,420.0) 33 (30, 35) 1,024 falling falling trend -14.4 (-16.9, -11.7)
Wasco County 2 Rural 1,792.1 (1,634.2, 1,961.1) 20 (7, 30) 98 falling falling trend -12.4 (-18.8, -5.1)
Union County 2 Rural 1,666.2 (1,513.3, 1,830.4) 25 (15, 32) 89 stable stable trend -8.2 (-17.8, 0.3)
Gilliam County 2 Rural 975.0 (644.7, 1,415.0) 36 (29, 36) 6 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.9, -3.0)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 1,885.6 (1,707.5, 2,077.6) 15 (3, 27) 87 falling falling trend -2.8 (-8.2, -0.1)
Baker County 2 Rural 1,279.3 (1,130.6, 1,442.3) 35 (30, 36) 55 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.9)
Benton County 2 Urban 1,531.9 (1,444.3, 1,623.5) 31 (25, 33) 238 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Curry County 2 Rural 1,588.3 (1,465.5, 1,718.8) 29 (20, 33) 128 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Lake County 2 Rural 1,653.6 (1,411.0, 1,926.6) 26 (8, 34) 34 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.2)
Harney County 2 Rural 1,544.9 (1,303.6, 1,818.3) 30 (15, 35) 29 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.3)
Malheur County 2 Rural 1,399.8 (1,260.0, 1,550.9) 32 (27, 36) 74 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.2)
Coos County 2 Rural 1,813.0 (1,722.5, 1,907.2) 19 (12, 26) 309 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Douglas County 2 Rural 1,652.6 (1,585.7, 1,721.6) 27 (21, 31) 467 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Wallowa County 2 Rural 1,713.9 (1,466.8, 1,991.0) 24 (6, 33) 36 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Yamhill County 2 Urban 1,944.8 (1,855.3, 2,037.6) 12 (6, 20) 363 falling falling trend -1.5 (-4.5, -0.7)
Morrow County 2 Rural 1,872.9 (1,596.4, 2,183.7) 17 (1, 32) 34 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 1,782.7 (1,682.8, 1,887.1) 21 (13, 27) 259 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Deschutes County 2 Urban 1,985.3 (1,921.0, 2,051.2) 10 (5, 17) 766 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Hood River County 2 Rural 1,829.6 (1,642.2, 2,032.6) 18 (4, 30) 72 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Klamath County 2 Rural 1,974.2 (1,871.0, 2,081.6) 11 (4, 20) 289 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.3)
Polk County 2 Urban 1,994.5 (1,896.2, 2,096.5) 9 (3, 18) 314 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Umatilla County 2 Rural 1,770.9 (1,666.7, 1,879.9) 22 (13, 28) 221 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Grant County 2 Rural 1,634.1 (1,402.3, 1,893.3) 28 (11, 35) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Linn County 2 Urban 1,935.3 (1,855.6, 2,017.6) 13 (6, 20) 458 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Tillamook County 2 Rural 1,885.4 (1,740.8, 2,038.9) 16 (5, 26) 133 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Wheeler County 2 Rural 1,747.3 (1,272.4, 2,342.1) 23 (1, 36) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.1)
Clackamas County 2 Urban 1,996.0 (1,950.7, 2,042.1) 8 (6, 15) 1,526 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Columbia County 2 Urban 2,182.8 (2,052.0, 2,319.9) 1 (1, 11) 219 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Josephine County 2 Urban 2,171.4 (2,086.1, 2,259.2) 3 (1, 8) 497 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Sherman County 2 Rural 1,366.2 (932.8, 1,930.5) 34 (5, 36) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.4, 3.7)
Washington County 2 Urban 1,894.3 (1,851.1, 1,938.3) 14 (11, 21) 1,516 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Marion County 2 Urban 2,096.7 (2,041.5, 2,153.0) 6 (1, 9) 1,125 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Jackson County 2 Urban 2,025.4 (1,968.4, 2,083.8) 7 (4, 14) 979 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.6)
Multnomah County 2 Urban 2,137.9 (2,097.8, 2,178.5) 4 (1, 7) 2,311 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Clatsop County 2 Rural 2,174.6 (2,037.0, 2,319.2) 2 (1, 11) 200 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Crook County 2 Urban 2,099.6 (1,933.7, 2,276.1) 5 (1, 19) 125 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 1:07 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top