Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia 2 N/A 2,091.9 (2,070.5, 2,113.5) N/A 7,491 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 2,004.7 (2,002.9, 2,006.4) N/A 1,067,371 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.8)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 1,619.8 (1,344.9, 1,934.8) 53 (28, 55) 25 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.5)
Hardy County 2 Rural 1,340.1 (1,162.6, 1,537.5) 55 (52, 55) 42 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Mercer County 2 Rural 1,941.7 (1,834.7, 2,053.3) 42 (24, 49) 252 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -1.2)
Tucker County 2 Rural 2,202.3 (1,903.0, 2,535.4) 12 (1, 49) 39 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Tyler County 2 Rural 1,818.3 (1,554.3, 2,114.5) 47 (12, 54) 35 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Greenbrier County 2 Rural 2,036.1 (1,894.8, 2,185.1) 38 (11, 48) 157 falling falling trend -1.1 (-4.4, -0.3)
McDowell County 2 Rural 1,776.3 (1,590.6, 1,978.0) 50 (28, 54) 69 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Mineral County 2 Rural 2,021.7 (1,860.3, 2,193.6) 39 (8, 49) 119 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Monroe County 2 Rural 1,815.1 (1,606.6, 2,043.4) 48 (20, 54) 56 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Putnam County 2 Urban 2,143.2 (2,018.3, 2,273.9) 20 (6, 42) 226 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Brooke County 2 Urban 1,974.1 (1,807.0, 2,152.6) 41 (12, 51) 105 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Mingo County 2 Rural 2,088.8 (1,898.9, 2,293.0) 29 (4, 48) 96 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Ohio County 2 Urban 2,086.2 (1,953.5, 2,225.4) 30 (8, 45) 190 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Roane County 2 Rural 2,084.4 (1,860.5, 2,328.1) 33 (3, 50) 65 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Webster County 2 Rural 1,810.4 (1,548.4, 2,104.2) 49 (10, 54) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Marshall County 2 Urban 2,064.8 (1,913.5, 2,225.1) 36 (8, 47) 143 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Ritchie County 2 Rural 2,169.6 (1,875.3, 2,497.3) 18 (1, 51) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Cabell County 2 Urban 2,085.6 (1,991.6, 2,182.9) 31 (12, 43) 374 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Grant County 2 Rural 1,650.1 (1,439.0, 1,883.6) 52 (35, 55) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.9)
Hampshire County 2 Urban 1,849.3 (1,685.6, 2,024.9) 45 (24, 53) 98 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Kanawha County 2 Urban 2,092.0 (2,026.1, 2,159.5) 28 (14, 41) 786 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Wyoming County 2 Rural 1,999.3 (1,811.6, 2,201.4) 40 (8, 51) 90 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Berkeley County 2 Urban 2,122.8 (2,023.7, 2,225.6) 23 (9, 41) 374 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.3)
Clay County 2 Urban 2,566.3 (2,232.0, 2,937.4) 1 (1, 31) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Morgan County 2 Urban 1,856.0 (1,670.6, 2,056.4) 44 (16, 53) 75 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Nicholas County 2 Rural 2,085.4 (1,915.6, 2,266.4) 32 (6, 47) 115 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Wirt County 2 Urban 2,109.4 (1,735.9, 2,540.9) 25 (1, 53) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 2.0)
Boone County 2 Urban 2,102.0 (1,911.7, 2,306.6) 27 (4, 48) 95 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Monongalia County 2 Urban 2,073.1 (1,961.7, 2,189.1) 35 (11, 45) 274 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Harrison County 2 Rural 2,297.5 (2,180.7, 2,418.9) 8 (2, 26) 295 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Logan County 2 Rural 2,311.8 (2,146.9, 2,486.1) 7 (1, 33) 156 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Marion County 2 Rural 2,184.1 (2,060.0, 2,313.8) 14 (4, 40) 236 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Pendleton County 2 Rural 1,403.1 (1,163.5, 1,677.5) 54 (47, 55) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.2)
Fayette County 2 Urban 2,057.8 (1,923.1, 2,199.5) 37 (9, 47) 179 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Lewis County 2 Rural 2,418.0 (2,188.9, 2,664.9) 3 (1, 31) 84 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Mason County 2 Rural 2,366.1 (2,184.7, 2,558.6) 4 (1, 30) 128 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Raleigh County 2 Urban 2,110.3 (2,007.7, 2,216.9) 24 (9, 42) 328 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Upshur County 2 Rural 2,169.5 (1,988.2, 2,363.2) 19 (2, 45) 107 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Gilmer County 2 Rural 2,127.3 (1,786.9, 2,513.3) 22 (1, 53) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Pocahontas County 2 Rural 1,878.6 (1,621.7, 2,164.8) 43 (9, 54) 39 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.9)
Preston County 2 Urban 2,079.4 (1,923.8, 2,244.5) 34 (6, 47) 137 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.3)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 2,105.3 (1,972.3, 2,245.0) 26 (8, 44) 198 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 4.4)
Summers County 2 Rural 1,714.1 (1,511.2, 1,936.7) 51 (33, 54) 53 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.3)
Wetzel County 2 Rural 2,223.8 (2,000.1, 2,465.7) 11 (1, 45) 72 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 6.0)
Pleasants County 2 Rural 2,532.6 (2,168.8, 2,940.7) 2 (1, 40) 36 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.5)
Braxton County 2 Rural 2,173.9 (1,937.5, 2,431.4) 15 (1, 47) 63 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Taylor County 2 Rural 2,190.4 (1,970.1, 2,428.9) 13 (1, 46) 74 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.9)
Doddridge County 2 Rural 1,846.5 (1,562.5, 2,167.8) 46 (6, 54) 31 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 4.2)
Wayne County 2 Urban 2,170.7 (2,030.5, 2,318.0) 17 (4, 42) 181 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 7.7)
Jackson County 2 Rural 2,289.3 (2,114.7, 2,474.5) 9 (1, 37) 129 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.3, 6.3)
Barbour County 2 Rural 2,268.9 (2,036.7, 2,520.5) 10 (1, 43) 71 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.4, 10.5)
Randolph County 2 Rural 2,341.2 (2,170.8, 2,521.6) 5 (1, 32) 142 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.7, 10.0)
Wood County 2 Urban 2,170.7 (2,072.4, 2,272.5) 16 (6, 38) 372 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.9, 5.8)
Hancock County 2 Urban 2,141.7 (1,985.9, 2,306.5) 21 (4, 44) 144 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.4, 8.7)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 2,317.0 (2,107.4, 2,542.1) 6 (1, 40) 93 rising rising trend 5.8 (2.0, 12.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 1:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top