Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural 383.4 (215.0, 630.1) 1 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural 316.5 (196.1, 483.3) 2 (1, 70) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.1, 1.2)
Pipestone County 2 Rural 284.7 (188.0, 413.7) 3 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.6, 3.3)
Murray County 2 Rural 284.0 (191.0, 406.7) 4 (1, 69) 6
*
*
Clearwater County 2 Rural 273.3 (174.6, 407.4) 5 (1, 71) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.8, 6.4)
Sibley County 2 Rural 268.6 (188.2, 371.5) 6 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.3, 3.7)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 263.7 (212.5, 323.5) 7 (1, 32) 19 stable stable trend 10.7 (-0.5, 29.4)
Dodge County 2 Urban 261.1 (184.9, 358.0) 8 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.5)
Lyon County 2 Rural 250.4 (186.2, 329.5) 9 (1, 59) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8)
Nobles County 2 Rural 232.8 (165.6, 317.8) 10 (1, 72) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 0.7)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 226.2 (153.0, 322.4) 11 (1, 76) 6 falling falling trend -5.7 (-19.2, -2.9)
Wadena County 2 Rural 225.9 (154.1, 319.5) 12 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.2)
Waseca County 2 Rural 224.7 (158.4, 309.7) 13 (1, 75) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.0, 1.6)
Kanabec County 2 Rural 221.0 (152.4, 309.5) 14 (1, 76) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.6)
Cottonwood County 2 Rural 220.0 (148.2, 315.0) 15 (1, 76) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.9, 2.6)
Rock County 2 Urban 219.2 (135.0, 336.3) 16 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.7, 0.4)
Renville County 2 Rural 218.5 (149.5, 308.1) 17 (1, 76) 7 falling falling trend -22.5 (-38.0, -6.7)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 215.8 (162.3, 281.2) 18 (2, 72) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-11.5, 19.6)
Marshall County 2 Rural 211.3 (129.7, 324.9) 19 (1, 77) 4 falling falling trend -16.2 (-31.0, -7.7)
Koochiching County 2 Rural 211.0 (145.4, 296.3) 20 (2, 76) 7 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.5, -1.3)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 210.6 (165.1, 264.8) 21 (4, 66) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.5, 1.8)
Douglas County 2 Rural 206.2 (166.0, 253.1) 22 (5, 61) 18 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.8)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 199.9 (161.1, 245.0) 23 (6, 65) 19 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.7, -0.8)
Jackson County 2 Rural 199.4 (125.3, 301.4) 24 (1, 77) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.2, 1.7)
Pennington County 2 Rural 196.7 (126.7, 291.5) 25 (2, 77) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.3, 1.4)
Rice County 2 Rural 195.1 (158.4, 237.7) 26 (7, 65) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 6.5)
Pine County 2 Rural 191.3 (143.9, 249.4) 27 (5, 74) 11 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.4)
Polk County 2 Urban 190.3 (142.3, 249.2) 28 (5, 76) 11 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.9, -0.4)
Faribault County 2 Rural 188.4 (126.7, 269.7) 29 (3, 77) 6 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.5, -2.3)
Chisago County 2 Urban 186.5 (146.6, 233.8) 30 (8, 73) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Watonwan County 2 Rural 186.2 (116.5, 283.2) 31 (2, 77) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.0, 4.4)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 186.2 (137.0, 247.2) 32 (5, 76) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 1.9)
Roseau County 2 Rural 185.0 (118.0, 275.8) 33 (3, 77) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.5, 3.1)
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural 184.6 (104.3, 301.2) 34 (2, 77) 3
*
*
Brown County 2 Rural 183.0 (136.5, 240.4) 35 (6, 77) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 1.0)
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural 181.9 (105.1, 292.7) 36 (2, 77) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 3.5)
Martin County 2 Rural 181.7 (130.2, 246.7) 37 (5, 77) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.1, 0.7)
Swift County 2 Rural 178.3 (107.5, 277.7) 38 (2, 77) 4
*
*
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 176.5 (126.3, 239.9) 39 (6, 77) 8 stable stable trend 19.9 (-5.8, 46.9)
Carlton County 2 Urban 174.7 (131.5, 227.6) 40 (9, 77) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.3)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 174.6 (123.4, 239.9) 41 (6, 77) 8 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.4, -1.8)
Redwood County 2 Rural 168.5 (111.4, 244.7) 42 (6, 77) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.3, -0.4)
Cass County 2 Rural 167.9 (128.0, 216.4) 43 (11, 77) 12 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -1.3)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 167.7 (138.6, 201.0) 44 (17, 74) 24 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.5)
Wright County 2 Urban 167.5 (141.1, 197.4) 45 (18, 72) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Winona County 2 Rural 166.4 (128.9, 211.3) 46 (13, 77) 14 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.7, -2.8)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 163.5 (145.7, 182.9) 47 (26, 68) 63 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.3)
McLeod County 2 Rural 163.0 (123.9, 210.7) 48 (12, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 9.8)
Todd County 2 Rural 162.9 (117.6, 219.6) 49 (10, 77) 9 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.5, -1.7)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 158.7 (124.3, 199.7) 50 (17, 77) 15 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -1.0)
Isanti County 2 Urban 157.0 (116.4, 207.1) 51 (13, 77) 10 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 7.7)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 155.4 (118.9, 199.5) 52 (18, 77) 13 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.6, 0.3)
Meeker County 2 Rural 155.1 (107.7, 216.3) 53 (11, 77) 7 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.7, -0.5)
Mower County 2 Rural 155.0 (116.9, 201.5) 54 (16, 77) 12 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.0, -0.7)
Anoka County 2 Urban 154.8 (139.4, 171.3) 55 (33, 71) 78 stable stable trend 1.6 (-5.0, 7.8)
Becker County 2 Rural 154.4 (115.6, 202.0) 56 (15, 77) 11 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.4, -0.9)
Lake County 2 Rural 154.3 (96.2, 234.4) 57 (7, 77) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.7, 2.5)
Itasca County 2 Rural 152.9 (120.8, 191.0) 58 (21, 77) 16 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.1, -2.4)
Wabasha County 2 Urban 152.8 (106.7, 212.0) 59 (13, 77) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.7)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 152.3 (110.5, 204.7) 60 (13, 77) 9 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.8, -2.4)
Pope County 2 Rural 149.6 (91.0, 232.0) 61 (7, 77) 4 falling falling trend -5.4 (-10.6, -1.4)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 149.6 (122.8, 180.5) 62 (25, 77) 22 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -1.0)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 149.3 (104.8, 206.3) 63 (14, 77) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.9, 1.6)
Carver County 2 Urban 146.1 (117.3, 179.7) 64 (24, 77) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.3)
Washington County 2 Urban 145.6 (128.9, 163.8) 65 (36, 75) 57 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.9, -2.0)
Scott County 2 Urban 144.6 (119.2, 173.8) 66 (30, 77) 24 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.1, -1.8)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 143.4 (135.5, 151.7) 67 (47, 72) 252 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.3, -2.6)
Benton County 2 Urban 143.1 (101.1, 196.7) 68 (16, 77) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.2)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 140.4 (120.5, 162.7) 69 (36, 77) 36 stable stable trend 6.5 (-2.6, 14.2)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 140.0 (128.4, 152.4) 70 (46, 75) 110 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.0, -2.5)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 138.6 (108.1, 175.1) 71 (26, 77) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
Steele County 2 Rural 133.3 (96.4, 179.5) 72 (22, 77) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.1, -0.2)
Clay County 2 Urban 131.2 (99.2, 170.2) 73 (31, 77) 12 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.9, -1.3)
Houston County 2 Urban 130.4 (86.1, 189.9) 74 (16, 77) 6 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.0, -3.1)
Dakota County 2 Urban 129.9 (117.3, 143.5) 75 (53, 77) 80 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.3, -3.3)
Stearns County 2 Urban 129.7 (110.0, 151.9) 76 (43, 77) 31 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.8, -1.2)
Morrison County 2 Rural 127.7 (91.7, 173.1) 77 (26, 77) 8 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.3, -1.6)
Big Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/27/2026 3:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top