Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tennessee 6 | 161.8 (158.4, 165.3) | N/A | 1,743 | falling | -3.4 (-6.1, -2.9) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 156.6 (156.1, 157.1) | N/A | 77,629 | falling | -2.8 (-3.1, -2.5) |
Haywood County 6 | 98.4 (55.8, 161.3) | 86 (31, 86) | 3 | stable | -3.6 (-11.1, 3.5) |
Carter County 6 | 117.7 (92.1, 148.3) | 85 (50, 86) | 15 | falling | -5.5 (-9.1, -2.3) |
Loudon County 6 | 124.9 (99.3, 155.1) | 84 (41, 86) | 17 | stable | 0.7 (-5.8, 17.1) |
Washington County 6 | 128.2 (108.2, 150.8) | 83 (49, 86) | 30 | falling | -2.8 (-5.4, -0.1) |
Lawrence County 6 | 129.7 (96.1, 171.3) | 82 (27, 86) | 10 | stable | -3.1 (-6.2, 0.0) |
Blount County 6 | 132.8 (113.4, 154.6) | 81 (47, 86) | 34 | falling | -3.8 (-5.8, -1.8) |
Wilson County 6 | 132.9 (111.0, 158.0) | 80 (40, 86) | 27 | falling | -4.7 (-6.5, -2.8) |
Cumberland County 6 | 136.4 (113.3, 162.9) | 79 (35, 86) | 25 | falling | -4.3 (-6.9, -1.5) |
Bradley County 6 | 136.9 (113.7, 163.5) | 78 (37, 86) | 25 | falling | -8.4 (-26.1, -3.8) |
Sullivan County 6 | 137.2 (120.2, 156.0) | 77 (46, 85) | 47 | falling | -3.0 (-4.6, -1.4) |
Cocke County 6 | 137.7 (102.5, 181.4) | 76 (21, 86) | 11 | falling | -4.6 (-8.2, -1.1) |
Williamson County 6 | 138.2 (119.3, 159.1) | 75 (43, 85) | 40 | stable | 3.7 (-3.6, 12.3) |
Meigs County 6 | 140.0 (81.5, 226.0) | 74 (4, 86) | 4 |
|
|
Madison County 6 | 140.1 (115.2, 168.7) | 73 (31, 86) | 23 | falling | -3.8 (-7.0, -0.7) |
Weakley County 6 | 140.5 (101.4, 189.6) | 72 (18, 86) | 9 | falling | -8.7 (-34.1, -5.0) |
Smith County 6 | 144.0 (90.5, 217.9) | 71 (6, 86) | 5 | falling | -14.7 (-30.9, -2.4) |
Hamilton County 6 | 144.4 (131.3, 158.4) | 70 (45, 82) | 91 | falling | -4.1 (-5.1, -3.1) |
Roane County 6 | 145.0 (115.9, 179.1) | 69 (24, 86) | 17 | falling | -3.0 (-5.6, -0.4) |
Claiborne County 6 | 145.8 (105.2, 196.9) | 68 (10, 86) | 9 | falling | -4.3 (-8.4, -0.2) |
Hardin County 6 | 145.9 (105.4, 197.0) | 67 (11, 86) | 9 | stable | -1.0 (-5.6, 4.4) |
Anderson County 6 | 146.6 (120.1, 177.1) | 66 (26, 86) | 22 | falling | -5.9 (-12.8, -4.1) |
Dyer County 6 | 146.9 (107.6, 195.9) | 65 (13, 86) | 9 | falling | -5.2 (-19.6, -2.3) |
Rutherford County 6 | 150.0 (131.3, 170.7) | 64 (34, 83) | 48 | stable | -2.1 (-4.5, 0.6) |
Jefferson County 6 | 151.8 (120.2, 189.2) | 63 (18, 86) | 16 | stable | -2.2 (-4.9, 0.7) |
Dickson County 6 | 153.9 (117.6, 197.8) | 62 (15, 86) | 12 | falling | -5.1 (-8.1, -2.3) |
Davidson County 6 | 154.5 (142.5, 167.3) | 61 (37, 76) | 126 | falling | -3.4 (-4.2, -2.7) |
Knox County 6 | 154.5 (141.7, 168.2) | 60 (37, 76) | 110 | falling | -3.2 (-4.4, -2.0) |
Unicoi County 6 | 156.0 (106.6, 220.6) | 59 (6, 86) | 6 | stable | -2.0 (-4.8, 1.0) |
Campbell County 6 | 159.3 (122.7, 203.4) | 58 (10, 86) | 13 | stable | -3.4 (-7.0, 0.1) |
Grainger County 6 | 160.7 (112.0, 223.5) | 57 (5, 86) | 7 | stable | -2.2 (-4.5, 0.3) |
Sumner County 6 | 161.0 (140.8, 183.3) | 56 (23, 80) | 47 | falling | -3.6 (-5.9, -1.2) |
Monroe County 6 | 162.2 (127.6, 203.4) | 55 (10, 85) | 16 | stable | -2.1 (-6.2, 2.8) |
Franklin County 6 | 162.4 (125.8, 206.3) | 54 (11, 85) | 14 | falling | -3.4 (-6.8, -0.2) |
Henry County 6 | 163.6 (124.6, 211.0) | 53 (9, 86) | 12 | stable | -2.2 (-4.6, 0.4) |
Chester County 6 | 163.9 (104.6, 244.6) | 52 (3, 86) | 5 | stable | -3.5 (-8.7, 1.9) |
Rhea County 6 | 165.6 (122.0, 219.8) | 51 (6, 86) | 10 | stable | -2.8 (-6.8, 1.4) |
Hamblen County 6 | 168.4 (136.8, 205.3) | 50 (8, 83) | 20 | stable | -0.8 (-3.7, 2.7) |
Putnam County 6 | 170.4 (139.7, 205.9) | 49 (11, 81) | 22 | falling | -3.7 (-5.8, -1.6) |
McNairy County 6 | 170.5 (124.5, 228.2) | 48 (4, 86) | 9 | stable | -3.3 (-7.5, 0.9) |
Tipton County 6 | 170.5 (133.0, 215.4) | 47 (8, 85) | 15 | falling | -3.3 (-6.3, -0.3) |
Wayne County 6 | 170.8 (112.2, 249.2) | 46 (2, 86) | 5 | stable | -2.6 (-7.7, 2.7) |
Shelby County 6 | 170.8 (160.4, 181.7) | 45 (28, 61) | 210 | stable | -3.9 (-13.1, 0.1) |
Warren County 6 | 172.0 (131.3, 221.4) | 44 (7, 85) | 12 | falling | -4.0 (-7.4, -0.8) |
Hawkins County 6 | 172.1 (139.4, 210.1) | 43 (9, 83) | 20 | stable | -2.8 (-5.5, 0.0) |
Maury County 6 | 174.0 (144.1, 208.3) | 42 (11, 79) | 25 | falling | -2.9 (-5.6, -0.1) |
Giles County 6 | 174.3 (129.0, 230.3) | 41 (5, 85) | 10 | falling | -2.9 (-5.4, -0.2) |
Morgan County 6 | 176.2 (120.4, 249.2) | 40 (2, 86) | 7 | stable | -4.8 (-10.6, 0.9) |
DeKalb County 6 | 176.3 (119.8, 250.6) | 39 (2, 86) | 6 | stable | -2.4 (-6.5, 1.9) |
Robertson County 6 | 176.4 (141.1, 218.0) | 38 (7, 82) | 18 | falling | -3.6 (-7.0, -0.1) |
Jackson County 6 | 177.3 (111.2, 268.6) | 37 (1, 86) | 5 |
|
|
Bedford County 6 | 178.0 (136.4, 228.5) | 36 (5, 84) | 13 | falling | -3.0 (-4.8, -1.1) |
Fayette County 6 | 183.0 (143.4, 230.1) | 35 (5, 83) | 15 | falling | -3.3 (-5.8, -0.4) |
Sevier County 6 | 186.5 (159.1, 217.4) | 34 (8, 68) | 34 | stable | -1.4 (-3.2, 0.6) |
Benton County 6 | 189.2 (132.0, 263.0) | 33 (1, 86) | 7 | falling | -6.2 (-25.8, -1.6) |
Lewis County 6 | 189.3 (119.5, 285.0) | 32 (1, 86) | 5 | stable | -2.7 (-6.6, 1.5) |
Greene County 6 | 192.3 (161.1, 227.9) | 31 (5, 69) | 27 | stable | -0.6 (-2.5, 1.6) |
Decatur County 6 | 193.7 (126.3, 284.4) | 30 (1, 86) | 5 | stable | -3.0 (-8.0, 2.1) |
Montgomery County 6 | 196.9 (168.4, 228.9) | 29 (6, 62) | 35 | stable | -1.2 (-3.0, 0.8) |
Polk County 6 | 197.4 (137.0, 275.7) | 28 (1, 85) | 7 | stable | -1.8 (-7.2, 3.7) |
Coffee County 6 | 197.5 (159.2, 242.3) | 27 (3, 72) | 19 | stable | -1.5 (-4.4, 1.7) |
Crockett County 6 | 197.9 (128.9, 290.5) | 26 (1, 86) | 5 | stable | 3.3 (-1.9, 10.1) |
Marshall County 6 | 198.5 (147.7, 261.4) | 25 (2, 82) | 11 | falling | -3.3 (-6.4, -0.1) |
Johnson County 6 | 198.8 (140.9, 272.5) | 24 (1, 85) | 8 | stable | -1.5 (-5.5, 3.1) |
Scott County 6 | 199.0 (137.8, 278.1) | 23 (1, 85) | 7 | stable | -2.5 (-7.4, 2.4) |
McMinn County 6 | 200.5 (163.9, 242.8) | 22 (3, 68) | 21 | stable | 3.2 (-8.9, 18.4) |
Cheatham County 6 | 200.9 (150.1, 263.3) | 21 (2, 81) | 11 | stable | -2.7 (-7.3, 2.1) |
Obion County 6 | 201.2 (153.6, 258.8) | 20 (1, 81) | 12 | falling | -3.3 (-5.3, -1.4) |
Gibson County 6 | 201.7 (160.9, 249.7) | 19 (2, 74) | 17 | stable | -0.9 (-3.4, 1.7) |
White County 6 | 202.3 (151.9, 264.0) | 18 (1, 81) | 11 | stable | -0.5 (-4.7, 4.4) |
Macon County 6 | 205.3 (144.3, 283.5) | 17 (1, 85) | 8 | stable | -3.2 (-6.9, 0.5) |
Hickman County 6 | 205.5 (148.0, 278.1) | 16 (1, 84) | 9 | stable | -3.6 (-7.0, 0.0) |
Lincoln County 6 | 209.5 (162.4, 266.0) | 15 (1, 76) | 14 | stable | -1.9 (-5.7, 2.0) |
Overton County 6 | 212.7 (154.9, 285.0) | 14 (1, 81) | 9 | stable | -1.0 (-4.7, 3.3) |
Hardeman County 6 | 213.1 (156.5, 283.7) | 13 (1, 80) | 10 | stable | 0.1 (-3.1, 3.5) |
Lauderdale County 6 | 214.3 (153.2, 291.6) | 12 (1, 82) | 8 | stable | -1.7 (-4.3, 0.9) |
Cannon County 6 | 218.8 (144.9, 317.3) | 11 (1, 86) | 6 | stable | 19.4 (-1.7, 41.1) |
Humphreys County 6 | 220.0 (156.8, 300.4) | 10 (1, 83) | 8 | stable | 1.6 (-2.3, 6.3) |
Henderson County 6 | 228.1 (171.8, 296.9) | 9 (1, 71) | 11 | stable | 0.2 (-4.0, 5.1) |
Grundy County 6 | 228.4 (154.5, 325.7) | 8 (1, 84) | 6 | stable | -1.4 (-5.7, 3.3) |
Stewart County 6 | 232.3 (157.1, 331.2) | 7 (1, 85) | 6 | stable | -1.7 (-5.6, 2.4) |
Marion County 6 | 243.4 (187.5, 310.6) | 6 (1, 60) | 13 | stable | -0.9 (-3.2, 1.9) |
Carroll County 6 | 244.5 (189.2, 311.0) | 5 (1, 57) | 13 | stable | -1.6 (-5.2, 1.9) |
Sequatchie County 6 | 246.5 (171.4, 343.2) | 4 (1, 79) | 7 | stable | 1.3 (-2.5, 6.7) |
Trousdale County 6 | 254.8 (146.7, 412.0) | 3 (1, 86) | 3 |
|
|
Fentress County 6 | 267.1 (196.2, 355.4) | 2 (1, 58) | 10 |
|
|
Houston County 6 | 269.0 (169.9, 405.8) | 1 (1, 83) | 5 |
|
|
Bledsoe County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Clay County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hancock County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lake County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moore County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Perry County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pickett County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Union County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Van Buren County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/01/2024 1:19 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bledsoe, Clay, Hancock, Lake, Moore, Perry, Pickett, Union, Van Buren
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/01/2024 1:19 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bledsoe, Clay, Hancock, Lake, Moore, Perry, Pickett, Union, Van Buren
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.