Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Letcher County 7 Rural 173.7 (121.9, 241.5) 92 (16, 107) 8 falling falling trend -9.5 (-16.9, -5.8)
Edmonson County 7 Urban 170.7 (103.1, 265.8) 96 (8, 107) 4 falling falling trend -8.1 (-26.0, -2.7)
Christian County 7 Urban 136.5 (104.5, 175.3) 104 (66, 107) 12 falling falling trend -5.3 (-22.1, -2.7)
Bourbon County 7 Urban 131.9 (85.0, 195.4) 106 (38, 107) 5 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.0, -2.6)
Henderson County 7 Rural 171.9 (132.7, 219.2) 93 (29, 107) 13 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.8, -2.6)
Larue County 7 Urban 201.4 (128.3, 301.8) 65 (3, 107) 5 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.1, -1.9)
McCracken County 7 Urban 139.2 (112.3, 170.7) 103 (70, 107) 19 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.0, -3.1)
Jessamine County 7 Urban 133.0 (99.3, 174.5) 105 (64, 107) 11 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.9, -1.7)
Carroll County 7 Rural 200.6 (115.5, 324.7) 67 (2, 107) 3 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.2, -0.6)
Graves County 7 Rural 167.6 (125.8, 218.9) 98 (29, 107) 11 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.7, -2.0)
Spencer County 7 Urban 213.0 (139.4, 313.2) 53 (2, 107) 6 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.7, -1.5)
Whitley County 7 Rural 156.2 (113.9, 209.7) 100 (35, 107) 9 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.1, -2.1)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 176.3 (165.7, 187.4) 90 (65, 96) 213 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.2, -3.0)
Bell County 7 Rural 141.9 (97.6, 199.8) 102 (38, 107) 7 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.3, -1.0)
Laurel County 7 Rural 201.9 (163.4, 247.0) 63 (16, 102) 20 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.6, -1.3)
Webster County 7 Rural 218.7 (138.8, 328.3) 48 (2, 107) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.9, -0.6)
Campbell County 7 Urban 196.6 (164.7, 232.8) 72 (23, 99) 28 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -2.0)
Trigg County 7 Urban 174.3 (114.7, 255.4) 91 (9, 107) 6 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.2, -0.5)
Boone County 7 Urban 177.7 (150.3, 208.6) 89 (41, 103) 31 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.5)
Meade County 7 Urban 167.0 (115.8, 234.3) 97 (16, 107) 7 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.9, 1.0)
Pendleton County 7 Urban 199.0 (124.2, 303.4) 66 (3, 107) 5 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.7, 1.3)
Franklin County 7 Rural 179.4 (140.9, 225.1) 88 (27, 106) 15 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.2)
Pulaski County 7 Rural 208.1 (173.0, 248.5) 56 (17, 99) 25 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.6)
Caldwell County 7 Rural 247.4 (169.7, 349.0) 24 (1, 105) 7 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.9, -0.3)
Shelby County 7 Urban 206.1 (161.0, 260.2) 59 (9, 103) 15 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.9, 0.3)
Grant County 7 Urban 205.8 (141.8, 290.2) 58 (5, 107) 7 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.8, 0.1)
Mason County 7 Rural 241.2 (168.5, 335.5) 23 (1, 103) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.8)
Marshall County 7 Rural 185.7 (141.8, 239.1) 84 (20, 106) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -1.0)
Boyd County 7 Urban 207.9 (167.9, 254.7) 57 (14, 102) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Calloway County 7 Rural 196.4 (149.8, 253.0) 73 (14, 105) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.1, -0.4)
Carter County 7 Urban 275.9 (212.7, 352.0) 11 (1, 88) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -1.0)
Greenup County 7 Urban 227.6 (181.0, 282.7) 41 (5, 98) 17 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.1, -0.3)
Russell County 7 Rural 193.8 (133.5, 272.3) 78 (7, 107) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.9, 0.4)
Scott County 7 Urban 169.4 (125.0, 224.4) 95 (21, 107) 10 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -0.7)
Hardin County 7 Urban 235.7 (201.8, 273.6) 32 (9, 80) 36 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.2)
Jackson County 7 Rural 130.4 (74.4, 216.8) 107 (28, 107) 3 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.3, 2.5)
Madison County 7 Rural 195.7 (161.9, 234.5) 74 (22, 101) 24 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.8)
Nelson County 7 Urban 221.2 (173.3, 278.4) 46 (7, 99) 15 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.4)
Pike County 7 Rural 186.2 (150.7, 227.6) 83 (24, 104) 20 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.7)
Simpson County 7 Rural 235.0 (162.5, 329.2) 31 (2, 105) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.4)
Allen County 7 Urban 193.0 (134.5, 269.5) 79 (8, 107) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Oldham County 7 Urban 182.8 (143.4, 229.8) 86 (25, 105) 16 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 1.4)
Knott County 7 Rural 194.3 (126.5, 287.2) 77 (3, 107) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.6, 1.3)
Woodford County 7 Urban 214.0 (157.0, 284.7) 52 (6, 105) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.5)
Bullitt County 7 Urban 199.2 (165.3, 238.2) 69 (20, 100) 26 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.0, 0.3)
Casey County 7 Rural 214.7 (147.8, 302.1) 51 (3, 107) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 1.1)
Rowan County 7 Rural 231.7 (163.4, 319.3) 37 (2, 105) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 1.0)
Anderson County 7 Rural 188.7 (128.1, 268.1) 80 (8, 107) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.6)
Muhlenberg County 7 Rural 195.7 (148.6, 253.2) 76 (13, 105) 12 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 231.3 (186.1, 284.2) 36 (6, 97) 19 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.3)
Lewis County 7 Rural 180.6 (110.7, 278.2) 87 (5, 107) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.5)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 234.5 (174.1, 309.3) 33 (4, 103) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 1.0)
Owen County 7 Rural 239.2 (153.5, 355.9) 30 (1, 107) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.3)
Grayson County 7 Rural 270.1 (204.1, 351.2) 14 (1, 91) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.6)
Harrison County 7 Rural 249.3 (177.9, 340.0) 22 (1, 101) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 1.0)
Logan County 7 Rural 224.5 (169.6, 291.9) 44 (5, 102) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 0.9)
Perry County 7 Rural 243.6 (181.7, 320.2) 28 (2, 101) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
Hart County 7 Rural 228.5 (157.0, 321.7) 40 (2, 106) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 2.1)
Henry County 7 Urban 271.5 (190.2, 377.0) 13 (1, 98) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.4, 2.2)
Leslie County 7 Rural 215.2 (132.1, 333.6) 50 (2, 107) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 2.3)
Wolfe County 7 Rural 302.5 (178.0, 481.5) 5 (1, 106) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.3, 3.5)
Clark County 7 Urban 203.6 (155.5, 261.7) 62 (11, 105) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
Daviess County 7 Urban 188.4 (159.7, 220.7) 81 (32, 101) 31 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.8, 4.6)
Floyd County 7 Rural 274.4 (218.4, 340.7) 12 (1, 75) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3)
Kenton County 7 Urban 206.6 (180.7, 235.3) 60 (24, 91) 48 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 3.7)
Livingston County 7 Urban 202.5 (122.9, 316.1) 64 (2, 107) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.5)
Ohio County 7 Rural 216.5 (157.3, 290.9) 49 (4, 105) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Estill County 7 Rural 195.4 (124.5, 293.3) 75 (4, 107) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.2)
Lawrence County 7 Urban 265.1 (184.1, 370.7) 18 (1, 104) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.9)
Adair County 7 Rural 205.1 (144.4, 283.5) 61 (5, 107) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.6, 2.8)
Barren County 7 Rural 228.6 (182.9, 282.4) 39 (6, 97) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Boyle County 7 Rural 223.7 (171.1, 287.2) 45 (5, 101) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.3)
Fleming County 7 Rural 289.1 (201.9, 401.5) 8 (1, 99) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.8)
McCreary County 7 Rural 211.5 (137.6, 312.0) 55 (3, 107) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.6)
Warren County 7 Urban 211.8 (181.1, 246.1) 54 (19, 92) 35 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.8)
Green County 7 Rural 151.1 (87.5, 243.5) 101 (12, 107) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.6)
Knox County 7 Rural 232.0 (177.5, 298.2) 35 (5, 101) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 1.0)
Clay County 7 Rural 288.0 (207.5, 390.6) 9 (1, 93) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.6)
Garrard County 7 Rural 220.7 (152.7, 309.4) 47 (2, 106) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.7)
Washington County 7 Rural 186.2 (112.9, 288.3) 85 (5, 107) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.9)
Bracken County 7 Urban 369.6 (236.1, 552.6) 1 (1, 94) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.7, 4.9)
Johnson County 7 Rural 225.6 (162.2, 305.9) 43 (3, 105) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 2.1)
Metcalfe County 7 Rural 225.8 (140.6, 344.5) 42 (1, 107) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.7)
Taylor County 7 Rural 243.4 (182.8, 317.9) 27 (2, 99) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.5, 3.9)
Lincoln County 7 Rural 275.8 (209.7, 356.5) 10 (1, 87) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.4)
Wayne County 7 Rural 173.2 (120.3, 242.3) 94 (16, 107) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.7)
Breckinridge County 7 Rural 296.2 (222.9, 386.5) 7 (1, 80) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.8)
Harlan County 7 Rural 232.7 (173.2, 306.2) 34 (2, 102) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 9.2)
Magoffin County 7 Rural 317.7 (209.6, 461.9) 3 (1, 99) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 3.3)
Powell County 7 Rural 244.3 (149.4, 378.4) 29 (1, 107) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.5, 4.7)
Mercer County 7 Rural 244.5 (180.1, 324.6) 26 (2, 102) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.2)
Morgan County 7 Rural 265.3 (174.1, 387.6) 17 (1, 106) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.8)
Bath County 7 Rural 253.0 (162.5, 375.5) 21 (1, 106) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 4.2)
Marion County 7 Rural 267.4 (190.6, 364.4) 16 (1, 99) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 4.0)
Butler County 7 Urban 257.4 (172.6, 370.6) 20 (1, 105) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 5.4)
Clinton County 7 Rural 267.4 (172.6, 398.1) 15 (1, 106) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 5.9)
McLean County 7 Urban 325.2 (213.4, 474.8) 2 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.5, 6.4)
Fayette County 7 Urban 162.6 (145.6, 181.1) 99 (66, 104) 69 stable stable trend 4.4 (-2.7, 9.9)
Rockcastle County 7 Rural 200.1 (134.1, 288.0) 68 (4, 107) 6 stable stable trend 5.2 (-1.6, 23.9)
Ballard County 7 Urban 197.1 (114.2, 318.8) 71 (2, 107) 3
*
*
Cumberland County 7 Rural 313.7 (193.0, 483.2) 4 (1, 106) 4
*
*
Elliott County 7 Rural 230.0 (131.2, 373.9) 38 (1, 107) 3
*
*
Lyon County 7 Rural 262.5 (170.4, 387.0) 19 (1, 105) 5
*
*
Monroe County 7 Rural 245.4 (160.5, 361.6) 25 (1, 106) 5
*
*
Nicholas County 7 Rural 306.4 (183.1, 482.5) 6 (1, 106) 4
*
*
Todd County 7 Rural 198.8 (118.8, 312.4) 70 (2, 107) 4
*
*
Union County 7 Rural 187.7 (115.8, 287.8) 82 (4, 107) 4
*
*
Breathitt County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlisle County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crittenden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 6:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top