Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Benzie County 2 Urban 107.2 (69.1, 158.7) 73 (13, 78) 5 falling falling trend -6.5 (-8.9, -4.6)
Houghton County 2 Rural 72.3 (45.6, 108.9) 78 (61, 78) 5 falling falling trend -5.9 (-9.2, -3.3)
Otsego County 2 Rural 146.7 (102.2, 203.6) 43 (3, 77) 7 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.9, -3.4)
Delta County 2 Rural 131.3 (99.4, 170.2) 59 (12, 77) 12 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.7, -1.7)
Mason County 2 Rural 120.2 (85.1, 164.9) 69 (15, 78) 8 falling falling trend -5.2 (-10.4, -0.8)
Muskegon County 2 Urban 99.6 (83.8, 117.5) 75 (58, 78) 29 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.4, -3.6)
Alcona County 2 Rural 149.4 (98.0, 218.4) 40 (1, 78) 5 falling falling trend -4.7 (-8.9, -1.2)
Manistee County 2 Rural 212.0 (163.2, 270.8) 5 (1, 58) 13 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.6, -2.2)
Oceana County 2 Rural 143.4 (100.8, 197.7) 48 (4, 78) 8 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.7, -2.0)
Allegan County 2 Rural 129.6 (107.5, 155.0) 62 (20, 75) 25 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.2, -3.1)
Emmet County 2 Rural 133.3 (97.2, 178.1) 56 (9, 77) 9 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.4, -2.2)
Leelanau County 2 Urban 125.4 (89.9, 170.1) 65 (11, 78) 8 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.4, -1.1)
Mackinac County 2 Rural 141.6 (87.1, 217.6) 49 (2, 78) 4 falling falling trend -4.5 (-9.1, -0.6)
Genesee County 2 Urban 117.8 (106.5, 129.9) 70 (48, 75) 82 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.4, -3.6)
Lapeer County 2 Urban 156.8 (129.5, 188.2) 36 (8, 71) 24 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.4, -2.5)
Washtenaw County 2 Urban 131.2 (117.3, 146.3) 60 (34, 71) 67 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.5, -3.3)
Ogemaw County 2 Rural 167.9 (120.7, 227.4) 26 (1, 76) 9 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.2, -1.9)
Sanilac County 2 Rural 177.4 (139.1, 222.9) 14 (1, 68) 15 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.2, -1.9)
Livingston County 2 Urban 132.5 (114.9, 152.0) 57 (28, 73) 43 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.5, -2.9)
Monroe County 2 Urban 123.0 (104.8, 143.4) 68 (35, 76) 33 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.5, -2.8)
Cheboygan County 2 Rural 124.5 (89.6, 168.6) 67 (13, 78) 9 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.6, -1.4)
St. Joseph County 2 Rural 145.6 (114.4, 182.7) 44 (7, 75) 15 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.7, -2.2)
Barry County 2 Urban 143.6 (112.4, 180.6) 47 (8, 76) 15 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.6, -1.0)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 158.2 (138.0, 180.4) 33 (11, 60) 46 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.7, -2.1)
Kalkaska County 2 Urban 150.3 (95.2, 225.0) 39 (1, 78) 5 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.3, -0.2)
Newaygo County 2 Rural 159.9 (124.8, 201.7) 30 (4, 74) 15 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.8, -0.8)
Wayne County 2 Urban 172.4 (165.3, 179.7) 20 (11, 34) 463 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.2, -3.2)
Ingham County 2 Urban 126.6 (110.8, 144.0) 64 (37, 74) 48 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.5, -2.9)
Kent County 2 Urban 132.3 (121.5, 143.8) 58 (37, 70) 114 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.4)
Wexford County 2 Rural 158.0 (117.4, 208.3) 34 (3, 75) 10 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.1, -1.2)
Antrim County 2 Rural 114.0 (78.1, 160.5) 71 (14, 78) 7 stable stable trend -3.5 (-5.6, 2.0)
Cass County 2 Urban 124.9 (95.4, 160.5) 66 (16, 77) 13 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.6, -0.7)
Roscommon County 2 Rural 168.5 (127.6, 218.3) 25 (2, 72) 12 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -1.0)
Charlevoix County 2 Rural 128.7 (91.0, 176.6) 63 (9, 78) 8 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.5, 0.0)
Eaton County 2 Urban 136.9 (114.3, 162.7) 53 (16, 74) 26 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.8, -1.6)
Tuscola County 2 Rural 159.1 (126.6, 197.5) 32 (5, 72) 17 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.5)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 138.7 (111.0, 171.2) 51 (13, 76) 18 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -1.4)
Iosco County 2 Rural 144.8 (107.8, 190.4) 46 (5, 77) 10 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -1.1)
Macomb County 2 Urban 166.1 (156.8, 175.8) 27 (14, 42) 242 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.8, -2.4)
Presque Isle County 2 Rural 106.2 (65.3, 163.1) 74 (13, 78) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.5, -0.2)
Clinton County 2 Urban 138.5 (111.0, 170.7) 52 (13, 75) 18 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.0, 0.2)
Lake County 2 Rural 175.8 (112.5, 261.6) 17 (1, 77) 5 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.3, 0.1)
Marquette County 2 Rural 129.7 (101.8, 162.9) 61 (17, 77) 15 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.0, -0.3)
Bay County 2 Urban 188.6 (162.6, 217.4) 10 (2, 45) 39 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.5)
Berrien County 2 Urban 174.6 (154.0, 197.3) 19 (5, 48) 53 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.7)
Shiawassee County 2 Rural 134.2 (105.9, 167.8) 55 (13, 77) 16 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.7, 0.7)
Alpena County 2 Rural 206.6 (160.2, 262.2) 7 (1, 56) 14 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.4, -0.5)
Iron County 2 Rural 175.9 (117.7, 252.7) 16 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.2, 0.4)
Clare County 2 Rural 149.2 (110.9, 196.6) 41 (4, 76) 11 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Grand Traverse County 2 Urban 154.0 (129.1, 182.2) 38 (9, 68) 28 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.7)
Midland County 2 Urban 145.6 (119.9, 175.2) 45 (11, 73) 23 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.3, 5.7)
Gogebic County 2 Rural 93.0 (55.6, 146.2) 76 (21, 78) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.1, 2.1)
Gratiot County 2 Rural 220.3 (173.2, 276.1) 4 (1, 50) 15 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 0.6)
Branch County 2 Rural 169.9 (130.8, 216.9) 23 (2, 71) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.4)
Hillsdale County 2 Rural 171.7 (134.3, 216.3) 21 (2, 69) 15 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 0.4)
Isabella County 2 Rural 199.1 (157.2, 248.8) 9 (1, 59) 16 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.1)
Ionia County 2 Urban 175.9 (138.8, 220.0) 15 (2, 67) 16 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.1, 0.0)
Oakland County 2 Urban 159.2 (151.6, 167.2) 31 (19, 45) 336 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.4, 1.8)
Menominee County 2 Rural 136.0 (95.9, 187.2) 54 (6, 78) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 0.9)
Lenawee County 2 Rural 148.1 (123.9, 175.6) 42 (12, 72) 27 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.5)
Mecosta County 2 Rural 156.5 (118.2, 203.3) 37 (3, 75) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.7)
Oscoda County 2 Rural 210.2 (131.7, 318.3) 6 (1, 76) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-7.2, 3.7)
Missaukee County 2 Rural 240.7 (166.6, 336.2) 1 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.4)
Montmorency County 2 Rural 228.7 (154.0, 326.8) 3 (1, 72) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.9, 4.1)
Huron County 2 Rural 200.7 (158.0, 251.2) 8 (1, 58) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 13.3)
Kalamazoo County 2 Urban 141.2 (124.7, 159.3) 50 (22, 69) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 8.7)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 179.6 (136.3, 232.3) 13 (1, 72) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.5, 5.6)
Montcalm County 2 Urban 161.4 (128.7, 199.8) 29 (4, 72) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 9.2)
Saginaw County 2 Urban 164.4 (145.9, 184.5) 28 (9, 53) 59 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 9.5)
Gladwin County 2 Rural 182.5 (137.8, 237.2) 11 (1, 69) 12 stable stable trend 3.4 (-5.4, 26.1)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 112.1 (98.5, 127.1) 72 (50, 77) 50 stable stable trend 4.5 (-5.3, 12.0)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 169.1 (145.8, 195.1) 24 (6, 55) 39 stable stable trend 5.2 (-1.1, 17.5)
Arenac County 2 Rural 171.4 (115.2, 245.6) 22 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend 6.2 (-0.5, 28.5)
Jackson County 2 Urban 181.8 (159.5, 206.2) 12 (4, 44) 49 stable stable trend 7.4 (-1.3, 17.1)
Osceola County 2 Rural 231.6 (173.3, 303.2) 2 (1, 50) 11 stable stable trend 8.8 (-2.0, 31.8)
Crawford County 2 Rural 175.1 (116.7, 252.7) 18 (1, 76) 6
*
*
Dickinson County 2 Rural 85.0 (54.7, 126.2) 77 (41, 78) 5
*
*
Ontonagon County 2 Rural 157.3 (89.0, 257.0) 35 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Alger County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 7:46 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top