Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Sawyer County 2 Rural 98.9 (60.5, 152.2) 68 (19, 68) 4 falling falling trend -19.7 (-43.6, -5.2)
Sheboygan County 2 Urban 141.7 (119.3, 167.0) 46 (16, 66) 29 falling falling trend -6.1 (-8.4, -4.2)
Green County 2 Urban 137.0 (100.2, 182.9) 50 (8, 68) 9 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.3, -2.4)
La Crosse County 2 Urban 117.4 (96.6, 141.4) 66 (33, 68) 23 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.2, -4.1)
Door County 2 Rural 128.4 (96.1, 168.0) 57 (11, 68) 11 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.4, -2.8)
Winnebago County 2 Urban 127.0 (108.5, 147.7) 59 (30, 68) 34 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.8, -3.5)
Marquette County 2 Rural 133.5 (85.0, 199.3) 55 (3, 68) 5 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.4, -2.4)
Trempealeau County 2 Rural 122.6 (83.5, 173.5) 63 (10, 68) 6 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.5, -2.3)
Calumet County 2 Urban 139.5 (103.9, 183.3) 48 (7, 68) 11 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.3, -2.1)
Columbia County 2 Urban 156.5 (123.4, 195.6) 37 (5, 66) 16 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.6, -2.7)
Dodge County 2 Rural 154.8 (128.3, 185.1) 40 (7, 65) 24 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.6, -3.0)
Douglas County 2 Urban 136.0 (101.5, 178.5) 52 (9, 68) 11 falling falling trend -4.6 (-13.6, -1.7)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 164.8 (135.6, 198.3) 28 (4, 62) 23 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.2, -2.8)
Racine County 2 Urban 143.7 (125.5, 163.7) 45 (17, 63) 46 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.2, -3.6)
Waukesha County 2 Urban 125.2 (114.0, 137.2) 61 (42, 67) 94 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.3, -3.7)
Wood County 2 Rural 136.3 (111.0, 165.5) 51 (15, 68) 21 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.3, -2.7)
Bayfield County 2 Rural 134.2 (89.8, 193.1) 53 (5, 68) 6 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.3, -0.8)
Dane County 2 Urban 117.7 (106.7, 129.6) 65 (47, 68) 86 falling falling trend -4.2 (-4.9, -3.6)
Walworth County 2 Rural 156.9 (132.1, 185.0) 36 (7, 61) 29 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.2, -2.4)
Dunn County 2 Rural 103.4 (71.1, 145.1) 67 (27, 68) 7 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.4, -1.0)
Green Lake County 2 Rural 168.8 (116.6, 236.3) 21 (1, 68) 7 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.3, -1.4)
Crawford County 2 Rural 129.6 (82.0, 194.4) 56 (4, 68) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-8.3, -0.2)
Outagamie County 2 Urban 150.2 (130.3, 172.3) 44 (12, 61) 42 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.5, -2.7)
Brown County 2 Urban 133.8 (117.7, 151.6) 54 (28, 66) 51 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.2, -2.8)
Fond du Lac County 2 Urban 160.7 (135.6, 189.0) 30 (7, 60) 30 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.6, -2.4)
Manitowoc County 2 Rural 138.6 (114.2, 166.6) 49 (14, 67) 23 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.8, -2.2)
Oneida County 2 Rural 198.2 (159.2, 243.8) 5 (1, 51) 18 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.1, -2.6)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 233.1 (181.7, 294.5) 2 (1, 40) 14 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.0, -1.7)
Oconto County 2 Urban 169.3 (130.3, 216.5) 19 (2, 65) 13 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.9, -1.6)
Ozaukee County 2 Urban 139.9 (116.6, 166.4) 47 (15, 67) 26 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.9)
Washington County 2 Urban 158.1 (136.0, 182.7) 33 (7, 58) 37 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.6, -2.3)
Rock County 2 Urban 171.1 (149.2, 195.3) 16 (5, 50) 45 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.7, -2.2)
Sauk County 2 Rural 191.8 (157.4, 231.5) 8 (1, 48) 22 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -1.3)
Marathon County 2 Urban 125.2 (105.8, 147.1) 60 (31, 68) 30 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.3)
Shawano County 2 Rural 159.3 (123.0, 203.0) 31 (3, 66) 13 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.4, -0.6)
Kenosha County 2 Urban 156.1 (133.9, 181.0) 38 (9, 60) 36 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.9)
Pierce County 2 Urban 158.2 (115.5, 211.3) 32 (2, 68) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-8.8, -0.8)
Chippewa County 2 Urban 173.5 (141.1, 211.2) 14 (3, 58) 20 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.5, -1.9)
Marinette County 2 Rural 167.4 (132.2, 209.0) 24 (3, 63) 16 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.9, -0.5)
Milwaukee County 2 Urban 169.1 (158.9, 179.8) 20 (10, 39) 212 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.7, -2.6)
Monroe County 2 Rural 120.6 (88.2, 161.2) 64 (15, 68) 9 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.4, 0.0)
Richland County 2 Rural 150.9 (101.1, 216.6) 43 (2, 68) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.3, -0.1)
Waupaca County 2 Rural 168.0 (134.2, 207.7) 23 (3, 63) 17 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -1.2)
Eau Claire County 2 Urban 127.7 (104.3, 154.8) 58 (21, 68) 21 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.9, 0.1)
Waushara County 2 Rural 155.8 (113.1, 209.1) 39 (3, 68) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.9, -0.1)
Jackson County 2 Rural 215.6 (154.3, 293.0) 3 (1, 61) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.7, 1.4)
Grant County 2 Rural 163.4 (128.0, 205.6) 29 (3, 65) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.8, -0.4)
Price County 2 Rural 125.1 (77.9, 190.1) 62 (5, 68) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.3)
Barron County 2 Rural 167.0 (133.3, 206.5) 27 (3, 63) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.7)
Kewaunee County 2 Urban 168.7 (117.8, 234.2) 22 (1, 68) 7 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.9, 0.0)
Rusk County 2 Rural 167.2 (110.6, 242.5) 25 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.9, 1.8)
Vernon County 2 Urban 193.1 (144.9, 252.0) 7 (1, 62) 11 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.1, 1.2)
Burnett County 2 Rural 151.8 (105.0, 212.4) 42 (2, 68) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.9)
Vilas County 2 Rural 196.9 (150.6, 252.7) 6 (1, 59) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.3)
Buffalo County 2 Rural 167.0 (106.6, 249.1) 26 (1, 68) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 1.6)
Ashland County 2 Rural 186.0 (123.4, 269.3) 10 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.1, 0.9)
Portage County 2 Rural 172.2 (139.0, 211.0) 15 (2, 60) 19 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.2)
St. Croix County 2 Urban 157.2 (127.5, 191.8) 35 (5, 64) 20 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.6, 0.1)
Polk County 2 Rural 169.6 (133.2, 212.9) 18 (2, 64) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.8)
Adams County 2 Rural 154.6 (110.5, 210.1) 41 (3, 68) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.3)
Iowa County 2 Urban 170.0 (118.0, 237.0) 17 (1, 68) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.9, 2.7)
Juneau County 2 Rural 202.7 (151.3, 265.9) 4 (1, 59) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.7)
Washburn County 2 Rural 181.9 (127.7, 251.3) 12 (1, 67) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 1.4)
Clark County 2 Rural 157.3 (113.8, 211.8) 34 (2, 68) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.4, 2.9)
Taylor County 2 Rural 179.3 (123.8, 251.1) 13 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.0, 2.8)
Langlade County 2 Rural 191.3 (138.6, 257.3) 9 (1, 65) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.4)
Forest County 2 Rural 263.0 (173.9, 381.5) 1 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural 185.0 (124.2, 265.6) 11 (1, 68) 6
*
*
Florence County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 2:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top