Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 2 N/A 181.6 (176.3, 187.0) N/A 907 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.5, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 155.0 (154.5, 155.5) N/A 81,215 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
Miller County 2 Urban 158.1 (119.0, 206.1) 61 (17, 70) 11 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.4, -2.2)
Franklin County 2 Rural 160.5 (105.6, 234.0) 59 (7, 70) 5 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.8, -1.1)
Cross County 2 Rural 187.4 (124.0, 272.0) 35 (3, 70) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-17.1, -0.2)
Faulkner County 2 Urban 152.2 (126.0, 182.1) 64 (29, 69) 24 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.1)
Polk County 2 Rural 150.2 (102.2, 212.8) 65 (13, 70) 6 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.1, -0.7)
Randolph County 2 Rural 171.1 (116.7, 242.4) 51 (6, 70) 6 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.1, -0.6)
Hempstead County 2 Rural 172.0 (115.8, 245.9) 48 (5, 70) 6 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.5, -1.4)
Logan County 2 Rural 106.9 (68.2, 160.3) 70 (36, 70) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.8)
Lonoke County 2 Urban 130.4 (100.6, 166.4) 69 (39, 70) 13 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.4, -1.4)
Izard County 2 Rural 145.5 (93.1, 216.2) 66 (12, 70) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -1.0)
Howard County 2 Rural 152.7 (90.2, 242.3) 63 (6, 70) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.6, 0.0)
Saline County 2 Urban 131.9 (110.8, 155.9) 68 (47, 70) 28 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.4)
Clay County 2 Rural 267.4 (192.7, 361.8) 4 (1, 58) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.7, -0.1)
Yell County 2 Rural 186.8 (128.2, 262.9) 36 (4, 70) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.5, 1.1)
Monroe County 2 Rural 289.1 (182.6, 435.5) 3 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.9, 2.4)
Jackson County 2 Rural 193.1 (129.6, 277.5) 30 (3, 70) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.1, 1.1)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 197.8 (148.4, 258.3) 27 (5, 68) 11 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Garland County 2 Urban 167.0 (144.2, 192.4) 55 (25, 66) 39 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.3)
Benton County 2 Urban 165.8 (147.6, 185.7) 56 (28, 65) 61 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.9)
St. Francis County 2 Rural 213.0 (151.1, 291.9) 21 (2, 68) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.0, 1.6)
Boone County 2 Rural 189.2 (147.6, 238.9) 33 (7, 67) 14 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.1)
Carroll County 2 Rural 171.2 (128.7, 223.5) 50 (10, 70) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.9)
Greene County 2 Rural 211.8 (166.9, 265.1) 22 (4, 62) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.0)
Stone County 2 Rural 158.1 (103.1, 231.9) 62 (7, 70) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.7, 1.9)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 161.9 (111.1, 228.0) 58 (7, 70) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.8, 1.7)
Clark County 2 Rural 167.5 (111.8, 241.4) 54 (7, 70) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.7, 2.5)
Sharp County 2 Rural 170.9 (121.3, 234.4) 52 (7, 70) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.4)
Crawford County 2 Urban 186.7 (150.2, 229.3) 37 (9, 65) 18 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 178.5 (135.8, 230.3) 42 (8, 69) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.4)
Marion County 2 Rural 144.5 (100.0, 202.5) 67 (17, 70) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 1.9)
Perry County 2 Urban 165.2 (93.8, 269.5) 57 (3, 70) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.4, 3.1)
Union County 2 Rural 193.5 (149.6, 246.4) 28 (6, 67) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.3)
Washington County 2 Urban 170.6 (149.3, 194.2) 53 (24, 65) 47 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Crittenden County 2 Urban 206.3 (159.9, 262.0) 24 (4, 65) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.6)
Pope County 2 Rural 193.4 (156.0, 237.1) 29 (8, 65) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.8)
White County 2 Rural 226.3 (189.7, 267.8) 14 (4, 49) 27 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.1)
Conway County 2 Rural 178.8 (123.6, 250.1) 41 (6, 70) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.6)
Independence County 2 Rural 223.5 (175.1, 281.1) 16 (3, 60) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.0)
Sevier County 2 Rural 178.4 (105.2, 282.1) 43 (2, 70) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.7, 2.2)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 232.8 (194.3, 276.9) 12 (3, 47) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.5)
Drew County 2 Rural 238.6 (166.8, 330.8) 11 (1, 65) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.9, 4.1)
Hot Spring County 2 Rural 185.3 (140.4, 240.2) 40 (7, 68) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 2.0)
Madison County 2 Urban 186.5 (125.2, 267.6) 38 (3, 70) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 4.2)
Ashley County 2 Rural 223.3 (162.0, 300.3) 17 (1, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.5)
Fulton County 2 Rural 225.9 (157.2, 314.5) 15 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.1, 4.2)
Johnson County 2 Rural 210.4 (151.7, 284.1) 23 (3, 68) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.5)
Ouachita County 2 Rural 252.4 (190.1, 328.6) 8 (1, 56) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 3.1)
Poinsett County 2 Urban 178.3 (125.8, 245.9) 44 (6, 70) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.8)
Baxter County 2 Rural 158.8 (129.3, 192.9) 60 (23, 69) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-12.1, 12.8)
Craighead County 2 Urban 192.4 (161.7, 227.3) 31 (10, 62) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Arkansas County 2 Rural 259.3 (186.2, 351.6) 5 (1, 61) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.7)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 173.1 (105.5, 268.1) 47 (3, 70) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.2, 4.4)
Grant County 2 Urban 176.0 (116.5, 255.3) 45 (4, 70) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.8)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 221.6 (134.9, 342.3) 18 (1, 70) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.7, 4.9)
Pike County 2 Rural 259.1 (170.2, 378.7) 6 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.7, 6.2)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 311.9 (229.0, 415.0) 2 (1, 42) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.7)
Phillips County 2 Rural 254.4 (181.5, 347.3) 7 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 3.9)
Pulaski County 2 Urban 172.0 (157.1, 187.9) 49 (27, 61) 102 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 10.1)
Sebastian County 2 Urban 188.4 (162.1, 217.7) 34 (13, 61) 38 stable stable trend 4.5 (-2.3, 18.2)
Columbia County 2 Rural 204.6 (144.5, 281.1) 25 (2, 69) 8 stable stable trend 16.1 (-0.9, 29.9)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 220.1 (127.5, 353.7) 19 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Dallas County 2 Rural 244.1 (143.7, 387.0) 10 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Desha County 2 Rural 358.4 (249.5, 498.5) 1 (1, 34) 7
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural 249.5 (150.0, 390.1) 9 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Lee County 2 Rural 229.0 (139.5, 355.1) 13 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Nevada County 2 Rural 191.2 (111.0, 307.7) 32 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Newton County 2 Rural 186.3 (107.6, 299.9) 39 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Prairie County 2 Rural 219.1 (135.6, 334.9) 20 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural 173.2 (100.8, 277.1) 46 (2, 70) 3
*
*
Searcy County 2 Rural 198.4 (118.9, 310.8) 26 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Bradley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chicot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Little River County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodruff County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 11:29 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top