Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 168.6 (164.0, 173.3) N/A 1,029 stable stable trend -1.8 (-2.8, 0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 155.0 (154.5, 155.5) N/A 81,215 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 193.9 (128.3, 281.4) 19 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend -21.5 (-41.6, 1.0)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 166.1 (120.4, 223.3) 39 (5, 59) 9 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.3, -3.2)
Logan County 2 Urban 160.5 (122.5, 206.7) 44 (9, 59) 13 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.1, -1.7)
Jackson County 2 Rural 99.1 (59.4, 155.4) 59 (31, 59) 4 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.0, -0.8)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 176.6 (132.6, 230.6) 34 (4, 58) 11 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.7, -1.6)
Stephens County 2 Rural 187.8 (149.0, 233.6) 24 (3, 55) 16 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.8, -1.7)
Creek County 2 Urban 184.2 (151.8, 221.6) 26 (6, 53) 23 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.6)
Payne County 2 Rural 163.3 (130.0, 202.5) 42 (10, 58) 17 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.6, -0.6)
Seminole County 2 Rural 165.6 (115.7, 229.9) 40 (4, 59) 7 falling falling trend -3.5 (-7.7, -0.1)
Noble County 2 Rural 179.3 (110.7, 274.8) 30 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.8, 0.5)
Washington County 2 Rural 139.1 (108.3, 175.8) 56 (22, 59) 14 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -2.0)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 141.2 (125.0, 159.1) 54 (33, 58) 56 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.2)
Woodward County 2 Rural 201.6 (138.5, 283.6) 14 (1, 58) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.6, -0.4)
Carter County 2 Rural 155.3 (118.4, 200.0) 48 (10, 59) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -1.0)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 152.9 (141.8, 164.7) 51 (31, 55) 144 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.2)
Canadian County 2 Urban 180.9 (154.6, 210.3) 28 (8, 51) 35 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -0.9)
Craig County 2 Rural 189.6 (123.6, 278.3) 22 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.0, 0.3)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 147.9 (118.0, 183.0) 53 (19, 59) 17 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.2)
Pawnee County 2 Urban 203.3 (136.4, 291.8) 13 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.2, 0.6)
Washita County 2 Rural 174.3 (101.0, 279.9) 35 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.6, 0.2)
Hughes County 2 Rural 160.1 (97.6, 248.0) 46 (2, 59) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.8, 1.3)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 155.0 (120.0, 197.0) 49 (12, 59) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.9, -0.1)
Marshall County 2 Rural 184.2 (124.0, 263.2) 27 (2, 59) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.4)
Custer County 2 Rural 197.4 (140.0, 270.4) 15 (1, 57) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.6)
Delaware County 2 Rural 140.3 (108.9, 178.1) 55 (19, 59) 14 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.9)
Woods County 2 Rural 217.1 (123.4, 353.4) 10 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.1, 2.3)
Comanche County 2 Urban 160.6 (133.4, 191.8) 43 (14, 57) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Garfield County 2 Urban 193.3 (156.5, 236.1) 20 (3, 53) 19 stable stable trend -2.1 (-3.8, 3.4)
Kay County 2 Rural 220.9 (177.9, 271.2) 9 (1, 42) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -0.1)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 154.8 (108.8, 213.9) 50 (6, 59) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 1.0)
Adair County 2 Rural 176.9 (116.0, 258.9) 32 (2, 59) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.7, 1.8)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 213.8 (166.2, 270.9) 11 (1, 51) 14 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.7)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 163.8 (126.9, 208.2) 41 (8, 58) 14 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 1.8)
Rogers County 2 Urban 171.4 (142.9, 203.8) 36 (10, 56) 26 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.2)
Texas County 2 Rural 158.3 (92.7, 252.1) 47 (2, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.3, 2.5)
Bryan County 2 Rural 177.3 (138.3, 223.9) 31 (5, 57) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.1)
Kiowa County 2 Rural 230.6 (138.0, 361.8) 4 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.3, 1.6)
McClain County 2 Urban 180.6 (135.4, 236.1) 29 (3, 58) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 12.9)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 184.6 (144.1, 233.1) 25 (4, 56) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.4)
Garvin County 2 Rural 188.5 (136.6, 254.0) 23 (2, 58) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.8, 1.7)
Atoka County 2 Rural 194.1 (125.2, 287.2) 18 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 3.0)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 160.1 (149.3, 171.5) 45 (26, 52) 169 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.4, 1.4)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 151.5 (122.5, 185.4) 52 (16, 59) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.6)
Grady County 2 Urban 176.8 (139.1, 221.6) 33 (6, 57) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.7)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 212.0 (160.1, 275.4) 12 (1, 54) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.3)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 223.2 (185.3, 266.7) 7 (1, 37) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.7)
Osage County 2 Urban 194.5 (155.7, 240.2) 17 (3, 52) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.4)
Haskell County 2 Rural 190.1 (120.2, 286.7) 21 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 3.1)
Caddo County 2 Rural 224.9 (164.2, 300.9) 6 (1, 54) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 2.9)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 257.9 (205.7, 319.4) 2 (1, 31) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
Kingfisher County 2 Rural 171.2 (104.1, 264.9) 37 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-22.6, 22.0)
Okfuskee County 2 Rural 315.9 (217.0, 445.4) 1 (1, 34) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.6, 5.4)
Mayes County 2 Rural 195.1 (151.0, 248.1) 16 (2, 55) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.4, 12.0)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 222.6 (175.4, 278.6) 8 (1, 45) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 5.8)
Beckham County 2 Rural 167.7 (109.5, 245.7) 38 (2, 59) 5
*
*
Blaine County 2 Rural 231.2 (140.7, 358.5) 3 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Latimer County 2 Rural 226.4 (143.4, 339.8) 5 (1, 58) 5
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural 118.8 (68.9, 191.3) 58 (11, 59) 3
*
*
Pushmataha County 2 Rural 128.3 (73.2, 209.3) 57 (7, 59) 3
*
*
Alfalfa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 9:38 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top