Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 2 N/A 162.1 (158.7, 165.6) N/A 1,771 stable stable trend -2.1 (-2.8, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 155.0 (154.5, 155.5) N/A 81,215 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 177.3 (125.3, 243.7) 40 (4, 90) 8 stable stable trend -22.1 (-44.3, 2.6)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 131.0 (102.3, 165.3) 87 (35, 90) 14 falling falling trend -14.4 (-28.5, -3.2)
Giles County 2 Rural 151.8 (110.7, 203.1) 72 (12, 90) 9 falling falling trend -7.0 (-22.2, -3.9)
Benton County 2 Rural 162.4 (109.0, 233.1) 58 (6, 90) 6 falling falling trend -6.1 (-15.0, -2.9)
Carter County 2 Urban 124.1 (97.4, 155.8) 88 (40, 90) 15 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.2, -2.6)
Morgan County 2 Urban 158.9 (107.0, 227.8) 62 (8, 90) 6 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.8, -0.8)
Anderson County 2 Urban 153.2 (125.9, 184.7) 70 (23, 89) 22 falling falling trend -4.5 (-10.8, -3.1)
Wilson County 2 Urban 116.7 (96.7, 139.6) 90 (64, 90) 25 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.2, -2.6)
Perry County 2 Rural 191.5 (111.0, 308.2) 26 (1, 90) 3 stable stable trend -4.1 (-9.0, 0.3)
Smith County 2 Urban 185.4 (123.0, 268.5) 34 (2, 90) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-10.2, -1.5)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 136.6 (113.4, 163.3) 83 (39, 90) 25 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.8)
Obion County 2 Rural 169.2 (125.3, 223.6) 49 (7, 90) 10 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -2.1)
Putnam County 2 Rural 153.4 (123.8, 188.0) 69 (21, 90) 19 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -2.0)
Bledsoe County 2 Rural 157.2 (97.5, 240.1) 65 (5, 90) 4 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.0, 2.5)
Williamson County 2 Urban 132.3 (114.6, 151.9) 86 (51, 90) 42 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.9, -2.2)
Campbell County 2 Urban 144.2 (108.5, 188.0) 77 (20, 90) 11 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.3, -1.1)
Scott County 2 Rural 158.7 (105.4, 229.9) 63 (7, 90) 6 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.4, 1.1)
Crockett County 2 Urban 168.8 (104.2, 258.6) 51 (3, 90) 4 stable stable trend -3.4 (-20.7, 1.9)
Davidson County 2 Urban 143.9 (132.4, 156.3) 78 (49, 86) 119 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.8)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 147.2 (133.9, 161.3) 74 (46, 85) 93 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.3, -2.6)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 161.1 (117.3, 215.8) 59 (10, 90) 9 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.9, 0.0)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 123.5 (90.9, 164.3) 89 (32, 90) 10 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.7)
Sumner County 2 Urban 158.6 (138.9, 180.4) 64 (25, 84) 48 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.5)
Warren County 2 Rural 169.4 (128.5, 219.4) 48 (9, 90) 12 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.3, -0.7)
Hickman County 2 Urban 193.7 (138.5, 264.1) 24 (2, 89) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.5)
Blount County 2 Urban 139.3 (119.6, 161.2) 80 (40, 90) 37 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.4)
Fayette County 2 Urban 173.7 (136.2, 218.3) 45 (11, 89) 15 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -0.8)
Knox County 2 Urban 153.6 (140.9, 167.1) 68 (39, 80) 111 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.9)
Lewis County 2 Rural 138.2 (79.8, 222.5) 82 (7, 90) 3 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.5, 0.7)
Marshall County 2 Rural 205.1 (153.6, 268.5) 17 (2, 85) 11 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.3, 0.6)
Bedford County 2 Rural 163.5 (123.2, 213.0) 57 (10, 90) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.3)
Cocke County 2 Rural 175.5 (135.1, 224.4) 41 (7, 88) 14 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.9, 0.5)
Robertson County 2 Urban 170.5 (136.2, 210.9) 47 (11, 87) 18 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.3, 0.0)
Shelby County 2 Urban 174.2 (163.7, 185.2) 44 (25, 61) 215 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -2.0)
Decatur County 2 Rural 209.8 (137.8, 306.1) 15 (1, 90) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.7, 1.3)
Stewart County 2 Urban 190.1 (122.9, 281.2) 30 (1, 90) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.4, 1.2)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 185.5 (151.8, 224.5) 33 (8, 82) 22 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.4)
Henry County 2 Rural 159.7 (120.6, 207.4) 60 (11, 90) 11 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.1, -0.1)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 139.0 (121.8, 158.0) 81 (46, 89) 48 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.5)
Franklin County 2 Rural 177.6 (139.7, 222.6) 39 (9, 87) 15 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.2, 0.3)
Johnson County 2 Rural 145.0 (96.6, 209.3) 76 (11, 90) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.3, 1.5)
Madison County 2 Urban 166.7 (139.3, 197.9) 55 (17, 86) 27 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.2)
Maury County 2 Urban 153.8 (126.7, 185.0) 67 (21, 89) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.1)
McNairy County 2 Rural 173.0 (126.7, 231.0) 46 (6, 90) 9 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.0, 1.0)
Rhea County 2 Rural 174.6 (129.7, 230.1) 42 (7, 90) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.7)
Tipton County 2 Urban 189.3 (149.9, 236.0) 32 (6, 83) 17 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.8, 0.0)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 169.1 (113.6, 242.5) 50 (4, 90) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.0, 1.3)
Roane County 2 Urban 167.3 (136.0, 203.7) 54 (13, 88) 20 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.2)
Washington County 2 Urban 141.3 (120.3, 164.8) 79 (38, 89) 33 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.6)
Bradley County 2 Urban 155.3 (130.4, 183.5) 66 (21, 89) 28 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.5)
Monroe County 2 Rural 134.2 (102.9, 172.2) 84 (26, 90) 13 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 1.2)
Grundy County 2 Rural 201.5 (132.1, 294.8) 19 (1, 90) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.1, 1.3)
McMinn County 2 Rural 181.2 (146.3, 221.9) 36 (8, 84) 19 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.1)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 174.3 (148.4, 203.5) 43 (15, 81) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.2)
Dyer County 2 Rural 167.5 (125.0, 219.8) 53 (8, 90) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.3)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 145.0 (114.4, 181.3) 75 (22, 90) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.2)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 198.4 (152.7, 253.5) 23 (4, 84) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.3)
Coffee County 2 Rural 191.7 (154.5, 235.2) 25 (7, 81) 19 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.1)
Wayne County 2 Rural 221.3 (152.7, 310.6) 12 (1, 88) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.4, 2.0)
Carroll County 2 Rural 215.3 (163.8, 278.0) 13 (2, 80) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 0.9)
Chester County 2 Urban 200.9 (133.0, 291.0) 20 (1, 90) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.9, 2.9)
Gibson County 2 Urban 182.6 (144.1, 228.2) 35 (8, 86) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 0.9)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 242.8 (176.2, 326.2) 8 (1, 76) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.7)
White County 2 Rural 166.3 (121.1, 222.8) 56 (7, 90) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.6, 2.7)
Rutherford County 2 Urban 159.4 (140.3, 180.2) 61 (27, 84) 54 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Sevier County 2 Rural 180.4 (153.2, 211.1) 37 (12, 76) 33 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Unicoi County 2 Urban 150.2 (100.3, 216.0) 73 (9, 90) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.9)
Polk County 2 Urban 246.0 (176.0, 334.5) 7 (1, 79) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.1, 2.7)
Overton County 2 Rural 208.8 (151.6, 280.8) 16 (2, 87) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 2.2)
Grainger County 2 Urban 202.7 (146.2, 273.8) 18 (2, 87) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Hardin County 2 Rural 153.2 (112.7, 203.6) 71 (13, 90) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.2, 2.5)
Cheatham County 2 Urban 286.2 (223.7, 360.6) 3 (1, 35) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.5, 3.1)
Henderson County 2 Rural 212.1 (159.3, 276.9) 14 (2, 82) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.7)
Haywood County 2 Rural 190.9 (128.4, 272.9) 28 (2, 90) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.6, 4.1)
Clay County 2 Rural 189.5 (112.0, 301.0) 31 (1, 90) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 18.9)
Macon County 2 Urban 256.1 (187.9, 341.2) 6 (1, 71) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.4)
Greene County 2 Rural 177.9 (147.6, 212.6) 38 (11, 82) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Loudon County 2 Urban 133.1 (106.7, 164.0) 85 (38, 90) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 10.5)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 200.2 (140.4, 277.1) 21 (2, 90) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 3.8)
Sequatchie County 2 Urban 190.7 (126.6, 275.5) 29 (2, 90) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.0, 6.2)
Marion County 2 Urban 272.1 (213.5, 341.9) 5 (1, 37) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.5)
Cannon County 2 Urban 289.2 (201.7, 401.9) 2 (1, 66) 7 rising rising trend 9.2 (0.7, 33.1)
Weakley County 2 Rural 199.3 (151.4, 257.5) 22 (3, 85) 12 stable stable trend 16.0 (-3.3, 34.2)
Dickson County 2 Urban 236.4 (189.7, 291.0) 11 (1, 55) 18 rising rising trend 19.4 (0.2, 33.8)
Fentress County 2 Rural 238.8 (172.8, 321.7) 9 (1, 81) 9
*
*
Houston County 2 Rural 238.5 (144.9, 370.7) 10 (1, 90) 4
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 191.2 (120.9, 287.8) 27 (1, 90) 5
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural 323.3 (186.7, 520.5) 1 (1, 89) 3
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural 167.8 (103.3, 258.6) 52 (3, 90) 4
*
*
Trousdale County 2 Urban 276.1 (162.9, 438.1) 4 (1, 90) 4
*
*
Hancock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 1:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top