Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 2 N/A 171.6 (168.0, 175.3) N/A 1,745 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.0, 0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 155.0 (154.5, 155.5) N/A 81,215 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
Wright County 2 Rural 188.6 (128.6, 266.6) 50 (4, 101) 6 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.6, -0.9)
Webster County 2 Urban 139.3 (98.6, 191.0) 96 (30, 101) 8 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -1.8)
Wayne County 2 Rural 344.8 (251.1, 462.2) 1 (1, 39) 9 stable stable trend 25.1 (-2.3, 54.1)
Washington County 2 Rural 127.0 (79.6, 192.1) 99 (30, 101) 5 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.7, -3.1)
Warren County 2 Urban 170.1 (126.0, 224.6) 67 (16, 101) 10 rising rising trend 8.8 (1.9, 26.6)
Vernon County 2 Rural 199.0 (140.3, 273.7) 39 (4, 99) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.7, 1.7)
Texas County 2 Rural 179.3 (130.6, 240.1) 61 (11, 100) 9 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.7, -0.7)
Taney County 2 Rural 143.9 (114.4, 178.5) 92 (42, 101) 17 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.9, 0.0)
Stone County 2 Rural 139.7 (106.9, 179.4) 94 (38, 101) 13 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.2, 0.6)
Stoddard County 2 Rural 293.2 (233.3, 363.9) 6 (1, 41) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 3.8)
Ste. Genevieve County 2 Rural 245.3 (177.4, 330.7) 15 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -26.1 (-52.2, 2.8)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 153.1 (145.0, 161.5) 84 (61, 90) 272 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.6, -3.4)
St. Louis City 2 Urban 139.3 (123.0, 157.2) 95 (63, 100) 56 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.4, -3.7)
St. Francois County 2 Rural 213.5 (176.0, 256.7) 26 (8, 79) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
St. Clair County 2 Rural 149.5 (88.5, 236.5) 87 (11, 101) 4 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.9, -2.1)
St. Charles County 2 Urban 136.7 (123.8, 150.6) 97 (69, 100) 84 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.6, 4.2)
Shannon County 2 Rural 209.0 (120.9, 337.8) 31 (1, 101) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.9, 2.9)
Scott County 2 Rural 160.3 (120.1, 209.5) 78 (20, 101) 11 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.1, 0.8)
Saline County 2 Rural 190.1 (134.3, 261.3) 49 (6, 100) 8 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.5, -2.6)
Ripley County 2 Rural 315.7 (217.0, 443.8) 4 (1, 78) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.3)
Reynolds County 2 Rural 241.6 (140.4, 387.0) 18 (1, 101) 3 falling falling trend -6.2 (-38.2, -1.0)
Ray County 2 Urban 182.9 (129.5, 251.0) 57 (8, 101) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.1, 0.3)
Randolph County 2 Rural 260.2 (194.3, 341.2) 12 (1, 76) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 3.0)
Ralls County 2 Rural 251.3 (164.3, 367.8) 14 (1, 99) 5
*
*
Pulaski County 2 Rural 155.2 (109.1, 214.6) 83 (19, 101) 8 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.2, -2.8)
Polk County 2 Urban 185.3 (138.2, 243.1) 54 (11, 100) 10 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.0, 0.5)
Platte County 2 Urban 147.7 (121.7, 177.6) 88 (43, 100) 23 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.7, -1.9)
Pike County 2 Rural 200.4 (135.9, 284.6) 38 (3, 101) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.4, 1.2)
Phelps County 2 Rural 201.0 (157.6, 252.6) 37 (9, 93) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.5)
Pettis County 2 Rural 185.2 (142.9, 236.2) 55 (12, 98) 13 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.0, 0.4)
Perry County 2 Rural 181.9 (124.8, 256.1) 59 (8, 101) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.1)
Pemiscot County 2 Rural 123.1 (71.2, 198.6) 100 (25, 101) 3 stable stable trend -3.4 (-10.0, 2.0)
Ozark County 2 Rural 164.3 (101.2, 253.1) 76 (7, 101) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.4, 2.2)
Osage County 2 Urban 210.6 (135.6, 312.9) 29 (2, 101) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.3, 4.0)
Oregon County 2 Rural 198.5 (119.2, 310.2) 40 (2, 101) 4
*
*
Nodaway County 2 Rural 279.8 (206.4, 370.7) 7 (1, 70) 10 stable stable trend 7.0 (-1.8, 30.9)
Newton County 2 Urban 179.8 (145.4, 219.9) 60 (19, 97) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
New Madrid County 2 Rural 168.2 (109.4, 247.4) 70 (7, 101) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.5, 1.9)
Morgan County 2 Rural 194.7 (142.1, 260.4) 45 (7, 99) 9 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.6, 0.1)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 323.4 (225.4, 449.2) 3 (1, 70) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.4, 4.3)
Monroe County 2 Rural 214.7 (132.5, 328.4) 23 (1, 101) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.1, 4.1)
Moniteau County 2 Urban 169.4 (104.4, 260.0) 68 (6, 101) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.1, 1.0)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 213.7 (136.5, 318.8) 25 (1, 101) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.7, 1.7)
Miller County 2 Rural 212.4 (155.5, 283.0) 27 (4, 96) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.6)
McDonald County 2 Rural 187.1 (126.1, 267.2) 51 (5, 101) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.6)
Marion County 2 Rural 273.0 (210.9, 347.6) 8 (1, 64) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 1.9)
Madison County 2 Rural 168.4 (103.7, 259.2) 69 (7, 101) 4 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.5, -0.8)
Macon County 2 Rural 312.3 (232.3, 410.9) 5 (1, 52) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 2.9)
Livingston County 2 Rural 190.3 (125.8, 276.3) 47 (4, 101) 6 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.3, 0.1)
Linn County 2 Rural 252.8 (171.3, 359.9) 13 (1, 96) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.7)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 150.0 (113.0, 195.3) 86 (27, 101) 12 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.4, -0.7)
Lewis County 2 Rural 243.8 (154.3, 367.0) 17 (1, 100) 5
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural 159.1 (119.4, 207.9) 81 (21, 101) 11 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.9)
Lafayette County 2 Urban 175.6 (130.9, 230.4) 63 (13, 100) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.3, 1.3)
Laclede County 2 Rural 195.7 (149.7, 251.6) 43 (9, 98) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.6)
Johnson County 2 Rural 195.7 (150.6, 250.1) 44 (8, 95) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.6)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 163.3 (143.7, 184.8) 77 (41, 94) 54 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.0, -2.6)
Jasper County 2 Urban 201.0 (172.9, 232.4) 36 (14, 76) 37 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.4)
Jackson County 2 Urban 166.7 (155.6, 178.3) 72 (47, 83) 174 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.8, -2.2)
Iron County 2 Rural 172.7 (100.1, 277.0) 65 (4, 101) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.4)
Howell County 2 Rural 190.1 (148.8, 239.5) 48 (13, 95) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.3)
Howard County 2 Urban 172.8 (99.9, 279.0) 64 (4, 101) 3 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.7, 1.1)
Hickory County 2 Rural 177.9 (113.8, 264.9) 62 (6, 101) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.3, 3.6)
Henry County 2 Rural 142.4 (99.0, 198.5) 93 (23, 101) 7 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.7, -1.7)
Harrison County 2 Rural 271.5 (173.2, 404.9) 9 (1, 97) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.8, 1.6)
Grundy County 2 Rural 204.1 (127.4, 309.7) 34 (2, 101) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.4)
Greene County 2 Urban 145.6 (130.6, 161.7) 90 (61, 98) 70 stable stable trend -0.7 (-8.5, 8.2)
Gentry County 2 Rural 330.0 (197.5, 517.4) 2 (1, 99) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.5, 3.7)
Gasconade County 2 Rural 103.3 (59.9, 166.0) 101 (50, 101) 3 falling falling trend -6.2 (-9.6, -3.7)
Franklin County 2 Urban 171.4 (145.2, 201.0) 66 (27, 95) 31 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.3)
Dunklin County 2 Rural 269.3 (209.3, 341.2) 10 (1, 65) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 3.9)
Douglas County 2 Rural 206.0 (136.3, 298.6) 32 (2, 101) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.4, 0.7)
Dent County 2 Rural 159.9 (103.2, 236.6) 80 (9, 101) 5 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.2, 1.0)
DeKalb County 2 Urban 165.1 (97.0, 263.2) 73 (6, 101) 4 falling falling trend -4.1 (-8.6, -0.2)
Daviess County 2 Rural 235.6 (141.0, 369.0) 19 (1, 101) 4
*
*
Dallas County 2 Urban 187.1 (127.4, 265.3) 52 (5, 101) 6
*
*
Dade County 2 Rural 182.3 (103.6, 297.0) 58 (2, 101) 3 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.3, -1.3)
Crawford County 2 Rural 228.4 (168.4, 302.7) 20 (3, 93) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.1)
Cooper County 2 Urban 211.7 (145.1, 298.3) 28 (2, 99) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 3.6)
Cole County 2 Urban 151.6 (122.7, 185.3) 85 (37, 101) 20 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.3)
Clinton County 2 Urban 192.7 (134.5, 267.5) 46 (6, 100) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.9, 1.4)
Clay County 2 Urban 197.9 (177.1, 220.4) 41 (20, 70) 68 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 10.8)
Christian County 2 Urban 164.5 (135.0, 198.6) 75 (26, 99) 22 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.2, -0.9)
Chariton County 2 Rural 184.7 (104.9, 300.7) 56 (2, 101) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.5)
Cedar County 2 Rural 160.0 (105.3, 233.3) 79 (12, 101) 5 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.9, -1.6)
Cass County 2 Urban 185.3 (158.0, 216.0) 53 (21, 87) 33 falling falling trend -3.0 (-12.3, -0.9)
Carroll County 2 Rural 221.4 (136.9, 339.2) 21 (1, 101) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.3, 4.7)
Cape Girardeau County 2 Urban 144.6 (116.9, 176.8) 91 (43, 101) 19 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.5)
Camden County 2 Rural 164.8 (131.9, 203.2) 74 (24, 99) 18 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.5)
Callaway County 2 Urban 209.8 (164.5, 263.6) 30 (7, 91) 15 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.4, 0.3)
Butler County 2 Rural 245.0 (198.0, 299.8) 16 (3, 67) 19 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Buchanan County 2 Urban 214.6 (180.8, 253.0) 24 (10, 74) 29 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.4)
Boone County 2 Urban 136.6 (115.5, 160.6) 98 (59, 101) 31 falling falling trend -7.1 (-14.9, -3.6)
Bollinger County 2 Urban 203.9 (127.0, 310.5) 35 (1, 101) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.4, 2.4)
Benton County 2 Rural 146.4 (105.0, 198.6) 89 (25, 101) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.1, -1.4)
Bates County 2 Urban 220.3 (151.3, 309.9) 22 (2, 98) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.2, 3.2)
Barton County 2 Rural 166.7 (101.5, 258.5) 71 (6, 101) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.2, 2.3)
Barry County 2 Rural 204.3 (159.7, 257.6) 33 (9, 92) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.1, 1.4)
Audrain County 2 Rural 196.0 (142.1, 263.8) 42 (6, 99) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 0.8)
Andrew County 2 Urban 156.2 (102.5, 228.4) 82 (11, 101) 5 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.2, -1.2)
Adair County 2 Rural 267.4 (198.2, 352.9) 11 (1, 74) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.6, 1.0)
Atchison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/30/2026 9:10 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top